Cargando…

Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a cognitive and emotional test battery in a representative sample of depressed outpatients to inform likelihood of remission over 8 weeks of treatment with each of three common antidepressant medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients 18–65 years old with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Evian, Rush, A John, Palmer, Donna M, Braund, Taylor A, Rekshan, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750532
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S75975
_version_ 1782359891724206080
author Gordon, Evian
Rush, A John
Palmer, Donna M
Braund, Taylor A
Rekshan, William
author_facet Gordon, Evian
Rush, A John
Palmer, Donna M
Braund, Taylor A
Rekshan, William
author_sort Gordon, Evian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a cognitive and emotional test battery in a representative sample of depressed outpatients to inform likelihood of remission over 8 weeks of treatment with each of three common antidepressant medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients 18–65 years old with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (17 sites) were randomized to escitalopram, sertraline or venlafaxine-XR (extended release). Participants scored ≥12 on the baseline 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report and completed 8 weeks of treatment. The baseline test battery measured cognitive and emotional status. Exploratory multivariate logistic regression models predicting remission (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report score ≤5 at 8 weeks) were developed independently for each medication in subgroups stratified by age, sex, or cognitive and emotional test performance. The model with the highest cross-validated accuracy determined the participant proportion in each arm for whom remission could be predicted with an accuracy ≥10% above chance. The proportion for whom a prediction could be made with very high certainty (positive predictive value and negative predictive value exceeding 80%) was calculated by incrementally increasing test battery thresholds to predict remission/non-remission. RESULTS: The test battery, individually developed for each medication, improved identification of remitting and non-remitting participants by ≥10% beyond chance for 243 of 467 participants. The overall remission rates were escitalopram: 40.8%, sertraline: 30.3%, and venlafaxine-XR: 31.1%. Within this subset for whom prediction exceeded chance, test battery thresholds established a negative predictive value of ≥80%, which identified 40.9% of participants not remitting on escitalopram, 77.1% of participants not remitting on sertraline, and 38.7% of participants not remitting on venlafaxine-XR (all including 20% false negatives). CONCLUSION: The test battery identified about 50% of each medication group as being ≥10% more or less likely to remit than by chance, and identified about 38% of individuals who did not remit with ≥80% certainty. Clinicians might choose to avoid this specific medication in these particular patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4348126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43481262015-03-06 Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression Gordon, Evian Rush, A John Palmer, Donna M Braund, Taylor A Rekshan, William Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a cognitive and emotional test battery in a representative sample of depressed outpatients to inform likelihood of remission over 8 weeks of treatment with each of three common antidepressant medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients 18–65 years old with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (17 sites) were randomized to escitalopram, sertraline or venlafaxine-XR (extended release). Participants scored ≥12 on the baseline 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report and completed 8 weeks of treatment. The baseline test battery measured cognitive and emotional status. Exploratory multivariate logistic regression models predicting remission (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report score ≤5 at 8 weeks) were developed independently for each medication in subgroups stratified by age, sex, or cognitive and emotional test performance. The model with the highest cross-validated accuracy determined the participant proportion in each arm for whom remission could be predicted with an accuracy ≥10% above chance. The proportion for whom a prediction could be made with very high certainty (positive predictive value and negative predictive value exceeding 80%) was calculated by incrementally increasing test battery thresholds to predict remission/non-remission. RESULTS: The test battery, individually developed for each medication, improved identification of remitting and non-remitting participants by ≥10% beyond chance for 243 of 467 participants. The overall remission rates were escitalopram: 40.8%, sertraline: 30.3%, and venlafaxine-XR: 31.1%. Within this subset for whom prediction exceeded chance, test battery thresholds established a negative predictive value of ≥80%, which identified 40.9% of participants not remitting on escitalopram, 77.1% of participants not remitting on sertraline, and 38.7% of participants not remitting on venlafaxine-XR (all including 20% false negatives). CONCLUSION: The test battery identified about 50% of each medication group as being ≥10% more or less likely to remit than by chance, and identified about 38% of individuals who did not remit with ≥80% certainty. Clinicians might choose to avoid this specific medication in these particular patients. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4348126/ /pubmed/25750532 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S75975 Text en © 2015 Gordon et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gordon, Evian
Rush, A John
Palmer, Donna M
Braund, Taylor A
Rekshan, William
Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title_full Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title_fullStr Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title_full_unstemmed Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title_short Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
title_sort toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750532
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S75975
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonevian towardanonlinecognitiveandemotionalbatterytopredicttreatmentremissionindepression
AT rushajohn towardanonlinecognitiveandemotionalbatterytopredicttreatmentremissionindepression
AT palmerdonnam towardanonlinecognitiveandemotionalbatterytopredicttreatmentremissionindepression
AT braundtaylora towardanonlinecognitiveandemotionalbatterytopredicttreatmentremissionindepression
AT rekshanwilliam towardanonlinecognitiveandemotionalbatterytopredicttreatmentremissionindepression