Cargando…

Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty

Absorbable sutures are widely used for wound closure after total hip replacement. Here we present two cases of suture-related foreign-body reaction that perfectly mimicked a periprosthetic joint infection, with sterile abscess formation and physical and laboratory signs of inflammation acutely prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierannunzii, Luca, Fossali, Andrea, De Lucia, Orazio, Guarino, Arturo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24916148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0300-4
_version_ 1782359931753594880
author Pierannunzii, Luca
Fossali, Andrea
De Lucia, Orazio
Guarino, Arturo
author_facet Pierannunzii, Luca
Fossali, Andrea
De Lucia, Orazio
Guarino, Arturo
author_sort Pierannunzii, Luca
collection PubMed
description Absorbable sutures are widely used for wound closure after total hip replacement. Here we present two cases of suture-related foreign-body reaction that perfectly mimicked a periprosthetic joint infection, with sterile abscess formation and physical and laboratory signs of inflammation acutely presenting 7–8 weeks after surgery, at the time of suture absorption. Both recurred with analogous timing after irrigation and debridement, likely due to re-using the same suture material. Multiple negative microbiological samples and positive histological samples showing a foreign-body reaction are the fundamental steps towards the diagnosis of a suture-related pseudoinfection (SRPI). Only three other cases have been reported to date, but the recurrence, together with the self-healing course after relapse, represents a completely novel feature and possibly the strongest demonstration of the supposed aetiopathogenesis. The knowledge of this possible complication leads to some clinical implications: all potential periprosthetic joint infections should routinely undergo not only microbiological but also histological sampling; caution should be used when recommending prosthesis exchange for potential infections occurring in the time range of suture absorption; lastly, if SRPI is suspected, a suture with low propensity to induce foreign-body reactions should be chosen after irrigation and debridement and the volume of absorbable material left in the wound should be as small as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4348502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43485022015-03-11 Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty Pierannunzii, Luca Fossali, Andrea De Lucia, Orazio Guarino, Arturo J Orthop Traumatol Case Report Absorbable sutures are widely used for wound closure after total hip replacement. Here we present two cases of suture-related foreign-body reaction that perfectly mimicked a periprosthetic joint infection, with sterile abscess formation and physical and laboratory signs of inflammation acutely presenting 7–8 weeks after surgery, at the time of suture absorption. Both recurred with analogous timing after irrigation and debridement, likely due to re-using the same suture material. Multiple negative microbiological samples and positive histological samples showing a foreign-body reaction are the fundamental steps towards the diagnosis of a suture-related pseudoinfection (SRPI). Only three other cases have been reported to date, but the recurrence, together with the self-healing course after relapse, represents a completely novel feature and possibly the strongest demonstration of the supposed aetiopathogenesis. The knowledge of this possible complication leads to some clinical implications: all potential periprosthetic joint infections should routinely undergo not only microbiological but also histological sampling; caution should be used when recommending prosthesis exchange for potential infections occurring in the time range of suture absorption; lastly, if SRPI is suspected, a suture with low propensity to induce foreign-body reactions should be chosen after irrigation and debridement and the volume of absorbable material left in the wound should be as small as possible. Springer International Publishing 2014-06-11 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4348502/ /pubmed/24916148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0300-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Pierannunzii, Luca
Fossali, Andrea
De Lucia, Orazio
Guarino, Arturo
Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title_full Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title_short Suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
title_sort suture-related pseudoinfection after total hip arthroplasty
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24916148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0300-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pierannunziiluca suturerelatedpseudoinfectionaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT fossaliandrea suturerelatedpseudoinfectionaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT deluciaorazio suturerelatedpseudoinfectionaftertotalhiparthroplasty
AT guarinoarturo suturerelatedpseudoinfectionaftertotalhiparthroplasty