Cargando…

The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems

At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanderelst, Dieter, Peremans, Herbert, Razak, Norizham Abdul, Verstraelen, Edouard, Dimitriadis, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545
_version_ 1782360056681988096
author Vanderelst, Dieter
Peremans, Herbert
Razak, Norizham Abdul
Verstraelen, Edouard
Dimitriadis, Greg
author_facet Vanderelst, Dieter
Peremans, Herbert
Razak, Norizham Abdul
Verstraelen, Edouard
Dimitriadis, Greg
author_sort Vanderelst, Dieter
collection PubMed
description At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and foraging. Moreover, species emitting sound through their nostrils often feature elaborate noseleaves that help in focussing the emitted echolocation pulses. Both pinnae and noseleaves reduce the streamlined character of a bat’s morphology. It is generally assumed that by compromising the streamlined charactered of the geometry, the head morphology generates substantial drag, thereby reducing flight efficiency. In contrast, it has also been suggested that the pinnae of bats generate lift forces counteracting the detrimental effect of the increased drag. However, very little data exist on the aerodynamic properties of bat pinnae and noseleaves. In this work, the aerodynamic forces generated by the heads of seven species of bats, including noseleaved bats, are measured by testing detailed 3D models in a wind tunnel. Models of Myotis daubentonii, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris microtis, Eptesicus fuscus, Rhinolophus formosae, Rhinolophus rouxi and Phyllostomus discolor are tested. The results confirm that non-streamlined facial morphologies yield considerable drag forces but also generate substantial lift. The net effect is a slight increase in the lift-to-drag ratio. Therefore, there is no evidence of high aerodynamic costs associated with the morphology of bat heads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4349651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43496512015-03-17 The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems Vanderelst, Dieter Peremans, Herbert Razak, Norizham Abdul Verstraelen, Edouard Dimitriadis, Greg PLoS One Research Article At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and foraging. Moreover, species emitting sound through their nostrils often feature elaborate noseleaves that help in focussing the emitted echolocation pulses. Both pinnae and noseleaves reduce the streamlined character of a bat’s morphology. It is generally assumed that by compromising the streamlined charactered of the geometry, the head morphology generates substantial drag, thereby reducing flight efficiency. In contrast, it has also been suggested that the pinnae of bats generate lift forces counteracting the detrimental effect of the increased drag. However, very little data exist on the aerodynamic properties of bat pinnae and noseleaves. In this work, the aerodynamic forces generated by the heads of seven species of bats, including noseleaved bats, are measured by testing detailed 3D models in a wind tunnel. Models of Myotis daubentonii, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris microtis, Eptesicus fuscus, Rhinolophus formosae, Rhinolophus rouxi and Phyllostomus discolor are tested. The results confirm that non-streamlined facial morphologies yield considerable drag forces but also generate substantial lift. The net effect is a slight increase in the lift-to-drag ratio. Therefore, there is no evidence of high aerodynamic costs associated with the morphology of bat heads. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349651/ /pubmed/25739038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545 Text en © 2015 Vanderelst et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vanderelst, Dieter
Peremans, Herbert
Razak, Norizham Abdul
Verstraelen, Edouard
Dimitriadis, Greg
The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title_full The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title_fullStr The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title_full_unstemmed The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title_short The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
title_sort aerodynamic cost of head morphology in bats: maybe not as bad as it seems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderelstdieter theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT peremansherbert theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT razaknorizhamabdul theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT verstraelenedouard theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT dimitriadisgreg theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT vanderelstdieter aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT peremansherbert aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT razaknorizhamabdul aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT verstraelenedouard aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems
AT dimitriadisgreg aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems