Cargando…
The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems
At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545 |
_version_ | 1782360056681988096 |
---|---|
author | Vanderelst, Dieter Peremans, Herbert Razak, Norizham Abdul Verstraelen, Edouard Dimitriadis, Greg |
author_facet | Vanderelst, Dieter Peremans, Herbert Razak, Norizham Abdul Verstraelen, Edouard Dimitriadis, Greg |
author_sort | Vanderelst, Dieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and foraging. Moreover, species emitting sound through their nostrils often feature elaborate noseleaves that help in focussing the emitted echolocation pulses. Both pinnae and noseleaves reduce the streamlined character of a bat’s morphology. It is generally assumed that by compromising the streamlined charactered of the geometry, the head morphology generates substantial drag, thereby reducing flight efficiency. In contrast, it has also been suggested that the pinnae of bats generate lift forces counteracting the detrimental effect of the increased drag. However, very little data exist on the aerodynamic properties of bat pinnae and noseleaves. In this work, the aerodynamic forces generated by the heads of seven species of bats, including noseleaved bats, are measured by testing detailed 3D models in a wind tunnel. Models of Myotis daubentonii, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris microtis, Eptesicus fuscus, Rhinolophus formosae, Rhinolophus rouxi and Phyllostomus discolor are tested. The results confirm that non-streamlined facial morphologies yield considerable drag forces but also generate substantial lift. The net effect is a slight increase in the lift-to-drag ratio. Therefore, there is no evidence of high aerodynamic costs associated with the morphology of bat heads. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4349651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43496512015-03-17 The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems Vanderelst, Dieter Peremans, Herbert Razak, Norizham Abdul Verstraelen, Edouard Dimitriadis, Greg PLoS One Research Article At first sight, echolocating bats face a difficult trade-off. As flying animals, they would benefit from a streamlined geometric shape to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase flight efficiency. However, as echolocating animals, their pinnae generate the acoustic cues necessary for navigation and foraging. Moreover, species emitting sound through their nostrils often feature elaborate noseleaves that help in focussing the emitted echolocation pulses. Both pinnae and noseleaves reduce the streamlined character of a bat’s morphology. It is generally assumed that by compromising the streamlined charactered of the geometry, the head morphology generates substantial drag, thereby reducing flight efficiency. In contrast, it has also been suggested that the pinnae of bats generate lift forces counteracting the detrimental effect of the increased drag. However, very little data exist on the aerodynamic properties of bat pinnae and noseleaves. In this work, the aerodynamic forces generated by the heads of seven species of bats, including noseleaved bats, are measured by testing detailed 3D models in a wind tunnel. Models of Myotis daubentonii, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris microtis, Eptesicus fuscus, Rhinolophus formosae, Rhinolophus rouxi and Phyllostomus discolor are tested. The results confirm that non-streamlined facial morphologies yield considerable drag forces but also generate substantial lift. The net effect is a slight increase in the lift-to-drag ratio. Therefore, there is no evidence of high aerodynamic costs associated with the morphology of bat heads. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349651/ /pubmed/25739038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545 Text en © 2015 Vanderelst et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vanderelst, Dieter Peremans, Herbert Razak, Norizham Abdul Verstraelen, Edouard Dimitriadis, Greg The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title | The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title_full | The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title_fullStr | The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title_full_unstemmed | The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title_short | The Aerodynamic Cost of Head Morphology in Bats: Maybe Not as Bad as It Seems |
title_sort | aerodynamic cost of head morphology in bats: maybe not as bad as it seems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderelstdieter theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT peremansherbert theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT razaknorizhamabdul theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT verstraelenedouard theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT dimitriadisgreg theaerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT vanderelstdieter aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT peremansherbert aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT razaknorizhamabdul aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT verstraelenedouard aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems AT dimitriadisgreg aerodynamiccostofheadmorphologyinbatsmaybenotasbadasitseems |