Cargando…

Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study

BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that comb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofman, Cynthia S., Makai, Peter, Blom, Jeanet W., Boter, Han, Buurman, Bianca M., Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M., Donders, Rogier, Melis, René J. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197
_version_ 1782360088937234432
author Hofman, Cynthia S.
Makai, Peter
Blom, Jeanet W.
Boter, Han
Buurman, Bianca M.
Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M.
Donders, Rogier
Melis, René J. F.
author_facet Hofman, Cynthia S.
Makai, Peter
Blom, Jeanet W.
Boter, Han
Buurman, Bianca M.
Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M.
Donders, Rogier
Melis, René J. F.
author_sort Hofman, Cynthia S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that combined multidimensional TOPICS-MDS outcomes into a composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) was developed based on the health state preferences of older persons and informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To derive preference weights for TOPICS-CEP’s components based on health state preferences of healthcare professionals and to investigate whether these weights differ between disciplines and differ from those of older persons and informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vignette studies were conducted. Participants assessed the general wellbeing of older persons described in vignettes on a scale (0-10). Mixed linear analyses were used to obtain and compare the preference weights of the eight TOPICS-CEP components: morbidities, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive problems, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Overall, 330 healthcare professionals, 124 older persons and 76 informal caregivers participated. The preference weights were not significantly different between disciplines. However, the professionals’ preference weights differed significantly from those of older persons and informal caregivers. Morbidities and functional limitations were given more weight by older persons and informal caregivers than by healthcare professionals [difference between preference weights: 0.12 and 0.07] while the opposite was true for pain experience, social functioning, and self-perceived QOL [difference between preference weights: 0.13, 0.15 and 0.26]. CONCLUSION: It is important to recognize the discrepancies between the health state preferences of various stakeholders to (1) correctly interpret results when studying the effectiveness of interventions in elderly care and (2) establish appropriate healthcare policies. Furthermore, we should strive to include older persons in our decision making process through a shared decision making approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4349801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43498012015-03-17 Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study Hofman, Cynthia S. Makai, Peter Blom, Jeanet W. Boter, Han Buurman, Bianca M. Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Donders, Rogier Melis, René J. F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that combined multidimensional TOPICS-MDS outcomes into a composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) was developed based on the health state preferences of older persons and informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To derive preference weights for TOPICS-CEP’s components based on health state preferences of healthcare professionals and to investigate whether these weights differ between disciplines and differ from those of older persons and informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vignette studies were conducted. Participants assessed the general wellbeing of older persons described in vignettes on a scale (0-10). Mixed linear analyses were used to obtain and compare the preference weights of the eight TOPICS-CEP components: morbidities, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive problems, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Overall, 330 healthcare professionals, 124 older persons and 76 informal caregivers participated. The preference weights were not significantly different between disciplines. However, the professionals’ preference weights differed significantly from those of older persons and informal caregivers. Morbidities and functional limitations were given more weight by older persons and informal caregivers than by healthcare professionals [difference between preference weights: 0.12 and 0.07] while the opposite was true for pain experience, social functioning, and self-perceived QOL [difference between preference weights: 0.13, 0.15 and 0.26]. CONCLUSION: It is important to recognize the discrepancies between the health state preferences of various stakeholders to (1) correctly interpret results when studying the effectiveness of interventions in elderly care and (2) establish appropriate healthcare policies. Furthermore, we should strive to include older persons in our decision making process through a shared decision making approach. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349801/ /pubmed/25739034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197 Text en © 2015 Hofman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hofman, Cynthia S.
Makai, Peter
Blom, Jeanet W.
Boter, Han
Buurman, Bianca M.
Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M.
Donders, Rogier
Melis, René J. F.
Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title_full Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title_fullStr Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title_short Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
title_sort comparing the health state preferences of older persons, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals: a vignette study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmancynthias comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT makaipeter comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT blomjeanetw comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT boterhan comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT buurmanbiancam comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT olderikkertmarcelgm comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT dondersrogier comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy
AT melisrenejf comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy