Cargando…
Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study
BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that comb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197 |
_version_ | 1782360088937234432 |
---|---|
author | Hofman, Cynthia S. Makai, Peter Blom, Jeanet W. Boter, Han Buurman, Bianca M. Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Donders, Rogier Melis, René J. F. |
author_facet | Hofman, Cynthia S. Makai, Peter Blom, Jeanet W. Boter, Han Buurman, Bianca M. Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Donders, Rogier Melis, René J. F. |
author_sort | Hofman, Cynthia S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that combined multidimensional TOPICS-MDS outcomes into a composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) was developed based on the health state preferences of older persons and informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To derive preference weights for TOPICS-CEP’s components based on health state preferences of healthcare professionals and to investigate whether these weights differ between disciplines and differ from those of older persons and informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vignette studies were conducted. Participants assessed the general wellbeing of older persons described in vignettes on a scale (0-10). Mixed linear analyses were used to obtain and compare the preference weights of the eight TOPICS-CEP components: morbidities, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive problems, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Overall, 330 healthcare professionals, 124 older persons and 76 informal caregivers participated. The preference weights were not significantly different between disciplines. However, the professionals’ preference weights differed significantly from those of older persons and informal caregivers. Morbidities and functional limitations were given more weight by older persons and informal caregivers than by healthcare professionals [difference between preference weights: 0.12 and 0.07] while the opposite was true for pain experience, social functioning, and self-perceived QOL [difference between preference weights: 0.13, 0.15 and 0.26]. CONCLUSION: It is important to recognize the discrepancies between the health state preferences of various stakeholders to (1) correctly interpret results when studying the effectiveness of interventions in elderly care and (2) establish appropriate healthcare policies. Furthermore, we should strive to include older persons in our decision making process through a shared decision making approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4349801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43498012015-03-17 Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study Hofman, Cynthia S. Makai, Peter Blom, Jeanet W. Boter, Han Buurman, Bianca M. Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Donders, Rogier Melis, René J. F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey—Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) collects uniform information from research projects funded under the Dutch National Care for the Elderly Programme. To compare the effectiveness of these projects a preference-weighted outcome measure that combined multidimensional TOPICS-MDS outcomes into a composite endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) was developed based on the health state preferences of older persons and informal caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To derive preference weights for TOPICS-CEP’s components based on health state preferences of healthcare professionals and to investigate whether these weights differ between disciplines and differ from those of older persons and informal caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vignette studies were conducted. Participants assessed the general wellbeing of older persons described in vignettes on a scale (0-10). Mixed linear analyses were used to obtain and compare the preference weights of the eight TOPICS-CEP components: morbidities, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive problems, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Overall, 330 healthcare professionals, 124 older persons and 76 informal caregivers participated. The preference weights were not significantly different between disciplines. However, the professionals’ preference weights differed significantly from those of older persons and informal caregivers. Morbidities and functional limitations were given more weight by older persons and informal caregivers than by healthcare professionals [difference between preference weights: 0.12 and 0.07] while the opposite was true for pain experience, social functioning, and self-perceived QOL [difference between preference weights: 0.13, 0.15 and 0.26]. CONCLUSION: It is important to recognize the discrepancies between the health state preferences of various stakeholders to (1) correctly interpret results when studying the effectiveness of interventions in elderly care and (2) establish appropriate healthcare policies. Furthermore, we should strive to include older persons in our decision making process through a shared decision making approach. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349801/ /pubmed/25739034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197 Text en © 2015 Hofman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hofman, Cynthia S. Makai, Peter Blom, Jeanet W. Boter, Han Buurman, Bianca M. Olde Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Donders, Rogier Melis, René J. F. Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title | Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title_full | Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title_short | Comparing the Health State Preferences of Older Persons, Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals: A Vignette Study |
title_sort | comparing the health state preferences of older persons, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals: a vignette study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25739034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmancynthias comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT makaipeter comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT blomjeanetw comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT boterhan comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT buurmanbiancam comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT olderikkertmarcelgm comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT dondersrogier comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy AT melisrenejf comparingthehealthstatepreferencesofolderpersonsinformalcaregiversandhealthcareprofessionalsavignettestudy |