Cargando…
Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560 |
_version_ | 1782360102492176384 |
---|---|
author | Vale, Glyn A. Hargrove, John W. Chamisa, Andrew Grant, Ian F. Torr, Stephen J. |
author_facet | Vale, Glyn A. Hargrove, John W. Chamisa, Andrew Grant, Ian F. Torr, Stephen J. |
author_sort | Vale, Glyn A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4349886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43498862015-03-17 Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna Vale, Glyn A. Hargrove, John W. Chamisa, Andrew Grant, Ian F. Torr, Stephen J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349886/ /pubmed/25738836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560 Text en © 2015 Vale et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vale, Glyn A. Hargrove, John W. Chamisa, Andrew Grant, Ian F. Torr, Stephen J. Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title | Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title_full | Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title_fullStr | Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title_full_unstemmed | Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title_short | Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna |
title_sort | pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valeglyna pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna AT hargrovejohnw pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna AT chamisaandrew pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna AT grantianf pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna AT torrstephenj pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna |