Cargando…

Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna

BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vale, Glyn A., Hargrove, John W., Chamisa, Andrew, Grant, Ian F., Torr, Stephen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560
_version_ 1782360102492176384
author Vale, Glyn A.
Hargrove, John W.
Chamisa, Andrew
Grant, Ian F.
Torr, Stephen J.
author_facet Vale, Glyn A.
Hargrove, John W.
Chamisa, Andrew
Grant, Ian F.
Torr, Stephen J.
author_sort Vale, Glyn A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4349886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43498862015-03-17 Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna Vale, Glyn A. Hargrove, John W. Chamisa, Andrew Grant, Ian F. Torr, Stephen J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: African trypansomiases of humans and animals can be controlled by attacking the vectors, various species of tsetse fly. Treatment of cattle with pyrethroids to kill tsetse as they feed is the most cost-effective method. However, such treatments can contaminate cattle dung, thereby killing the fauna which disperse the dung and so play an important role in soil fertility. Hence there is a need to identify cost-effective methods of treating cattle with minimal impact on dung fauna. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used dung beetles to field bioassay the levels of dung contamination following the use of spray and pour-on formulations of deltamethrin, applied to various parts of the body of cattle in Zimbabwe. Results suggested that dung was contaminated by contact with insecticide on the body surface as the cattle defecated, and by ingestion of insecticide as the cattle licked themselves. Death of dung beetles was reduced to negligible levels by using only the spray and applying it to the legs and belly or legs alone, i.e., places where most tsetse feed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The restricted applications suitable for minimising the impact on dung fauna have the collateral benefits of improving the economy and convenience of cattle treatments for tsetse control. The demonstration of collateral benefits is one of the surest ways of promoting environmentally friendly procedures. Public Library of Science 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4349886/ /pubmed/25738836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560 Text en © 2015 Vale et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vale, Glyn A.
Hargrove, John W.
Chamisa, Andrew
Grant, Ian F.
Torr, Stephen J.
Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title_full Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title_fullStr Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title_full_unstemmed Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title_short Pyrethroid Treatment of Cattle for Tsetse Control: Reducing Its Impact on Dung Fauna
title_sort pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003560
work_keys_str_mv AT valeglyna pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT hargrovejohnw pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT chamisaandrew pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT grantianf pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna
AT torrstephenj pyrethroidtreatmentofcattlefortsetsecontrolreducingitsimpactondungfauna