Cargando…
Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of su...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25745568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761 |
_version_ | 1782360125304995840 |
---|---|
author | Ezugwu, EC Van der Burg, S |
author_facet | Ezugwu, EC Van der Burg, S |
author_sort | Ezugwu, EC |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of successful IVF pregnancy rate. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is advocated in most European countries. In Belgium and Sweden, eSET is mandatory for couples with a good prognosis. However, despite clinical recommendations and policy statements, patients in clinical practice frequently do request for the transfer of multiple embryos in order to have twins. Such requests conflict with policy guidelines and create an ethical dilemma for physicians: Should the physician do as the couple requests, and there with respect the autonomy of patients, or adhere to medical policy that takes the health of the mother and children at heart? This article provides an exploration of the arguments found in the literature that plays a role in the discussion on this topic and eventually argues that what a physician should do depends on the specificities of the context in which patients and physicians are implicated. These contextual issues can be taken into account in a shared decision-making procedure, which allows reflections and the responsibilities of both patients and physicians to be attended in decision about assisted reproduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4350055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43500552015-03-05 Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach Ezugwu, EC Van der Burg, S Ann Med Health Sci Res Review Article The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of successful IVF pregnancy rate. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is advocated in most European countries. In Belgium and Sweden, eSET is mandatory for couples with a good prognosis. However, despite clinical recommendations and policy statements, patients in clinical practice frequently do request for the transfer of multiple embryos in order to have twins. Such requests conflict with policy guidelines and create an ethical dilemma for physicians: Should the physician do as the couple requests, and there with respect the autonomy of patients, or adhere to medical policy that takes the health of the mother and children at heart? This article provides an exploration of the arguments found in the literature that plays a role in the discussion on this topic and eventually argues that what a physician should do depends on the specificities of the context in which patients and physicians are implicated. These contextual issues can be taken into account in a shared decision-making procedure, which allows reflections and the responsibilities of both patients and physicians to be attended in decision about assisted reproduction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4350055/ /pubmed/25745568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ezugwu, EC Van der Burg, S Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title_full | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title_fullStr | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title_short | Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach |
title_sort | debating elective single embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization: a plea for a context-sensitive approach |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25745568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezugwuec debatingelectivesingleembryotransferafterinvitrofertilizationapleaforacontextsensitiveapproach AT vanderburgs debatingelectivesingleembryotransferafterinvitrofertilizationapleaforacontextsensitiveapproach |