Cargando…

Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach

The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ezugwu, EC, Van der Burg, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25745568
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761
_version_ 1782360125304995840
author Ezugwu, EC
Van der Burg, S
author_facet Ezugwu, EC
Van der Burg, S
author_sort Ezugwu, EC
collection PubMed
description The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of successful IVF pregnancy rate. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is advocated in most European countries. In Belgium and Sweden, eSET is mandatory for couples with a good prognosis. However, despite clinical recommendations and policy statements, patients in clinical practice frequently do request for the transfer of multiple embryos in order to have twins. Such requests conflict with policy guidelines and create an ethical dilemma for physicians: Should the physician do as the couple requests, and there with respect the autonomy of patients, or adhere to medical policy that takes the health of the mother and children at heart? This article provides an exploration of the arguments found in the literature that plays a role in the discussion on this topic and eventually argues that what a physician should do depends on the specificities of the context in which patients and physicians are implicated. These contextual issues can be taken into account in a shared decision-making procedure, which allows reflections and the responsibilities of both patients and physicians to be attended in decision about assisted reproduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4350055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43500552015-03-05 Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach Ezugwu, EC Van der Burg, S Ann Med Health Sci Res Review Article The number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been a topic of debate for over a decade now. Due to the risk associated with multiple pregnancy, there has been a global effort at reducing the multiple pregnancy rates to a minimum while maintaining an acceptable level of successful IVF pregnancy rate. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is advocated in most European countries. In Belgium and Sweden, eSET is mandatory for couples with a good prognosis. However, despite clinical recommendations and policy statements, patients in clinical practice frequently do request for the transfer of multiple embryos in order to have twins. Such requests conflict with policy guidelines and create an ethical dilemma for physicians: Should the physician do as the couple requests, and there with respect the autonomy of patients, or adhere to medical policy that takes the health of the mother and children at heart? This article provides an exploration of the arguments found in the literature that plays a role in the discussion on this topic and eventually argues that what a physician should do depends on the specificities of the context in which patients and physicians are implicated. These contextual issues can be taken into account in a shared decision-making procedure, which allows reflections and the responsibilities of both patients and physicians to be attended in decision about assisted reproduction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4350055/ /pubmed/25745568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ezugwu, EC
Van der Burg, S
Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title_full Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title_fullStr Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title_full_unstemmed Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title_short Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach
title_sort debating elective single embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization: a plea for a context-sensitive approach
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25745568
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761
work_keys_str_mv AT ezugwuec debatingelectivesingleembryotransferafterinvitrofertilizationapleaforacontextsensitiveapproach
AT vanderburgs debatingelectivesingleembryotransferafterinvitrofertilizationapleaforacontextsensitiveapproach