Cargando…
An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ
BACKGROUND: Melanoma in situ (MIS) accounts for up to 27% of all melanomas. MIS has no metastatic potential and the aim should be to excise the lesion completely with a clear histological margin, although margin clearance remains undefined. We aimed to assess the relation of histological excision ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000272 |
_version_ | 1782360170618159104 |
---|---|
author | Joyce, Kenneth M. Joyce, Cormac W. Jones, Deirdre M. Donnellan, Paul Hussey, Alan J. Regan, Padraic J. Kelly, Jack L. |
author_facet | Joyce, Kenneth M. Joyce, Cormac W. Jones, Deirdre M. Donnellan, Paul Hussey, Alan J. Regan, Padraic J. Kelly, Jack L. |
author_sort | Joyce, Kenneth M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Melanoma in situ (MIS) accounts for up to 27% of all melanomas. MIS has no metastatic potential and the aim should be to excise the lesion completely with a clear histological margin, although margin clearance remains undefined. We aimed to assess the relation of histological excision margins of MIS to recurrence and progression to invasive disease. METHODS: We analyzed all patients with MIS excised by wide local excision or staged excision in our institution over a 5-year period from December 2008 to January 2014 using a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic details included patient demographics, anatomical site of lesion, melanoma subtype, histological excision margin, and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients had MIS excised during this time, the majority of which were lentigo maligna subtype (79%). The average histological excision margin was 3.7 mm. The rate of recurrence was 2.2% (9/410), with a median follow-up of 23 months. Lentigo maligna had a similar rate of recurrence to non-lentigo MIS (2.3% vs 1.2%) (P = 0.69). The mean excision margin of those that recurred was 1.9 mm compared with an average of 3.8 mm in those that did not. The rate of recurrence of MIS with histological excision margin ≤3.00 mm was 3.8% compared with 0.5% in those with a histological margin >3.00 mm (P = 0.03). One case of MIS recurred as invasive disease. CONCLUSION: At institutions using wide local excision or staged excision for MIS, a histological margin of >3.0 mm is required to achieve a low recurrence rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4350307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43503072015-03-06 An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ Joyce, Kenneth M. Joyce, Cormac W. Jones, Deirdre M. Donnellan, Paul Hussey, Alan J. Regan, Padraic J. Kelly, Jack L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Melanoma in situ (MIS) accounts for up to 27% of all melanomas. MIS has no metastatic potential and the aim should be to excise the lesion completely with a clear histological margin, although margin clearance remains undefined. We aimed to assess the relation of histological excision margins of MIS to recurrence and progression to invasive disease. METHODS: We analyzed all patients with MIS excised by wide local excision or staged excision in our institution over a 5-year period from December 2008 to January 2014 using a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic details included patient demographics, anatomical site of lesion, melanoma subtype, histological excision margin, and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients had MIS excised during this time, the majority of which were lentigo maligna subtype (79%). The average histological excision margin was 3.7 mm. The rate of recurrence was 2.2% (9/410), with a median follow-up of 23 months. Lentigo maligna had a similar rate of recurrence to non-lentigo MIS (2.3% vs 1.2%) (P = 0.69). The mean excision margin of those that recurred was 1.9 mm compared with an average of 3.8 mm in those that did not. The rate of recurrence of MIS with histological excision margin ≤3.00 mm was 3.8% compared with 0.5% in those with a histological margin >3.00 mm (P = 0.03). One case of MIS recurred as invasive disease. CONCLUSION: At institutions using wide local excision or staged excision for MIS, a histological margin of >3.0 mm is required to achieve a low recurrence rate. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4350307/ /pubmed/25750840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000272 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Joyce, Kenneth M. Joyce, Cormac W. Jones, Deirdre M. Donnellan, Paul Hussey, Alan J. Regan, Padraic J. Kelly, Jack L. An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title | An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title_full | An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title_fullStr | An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title_full_unstemmed | An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title_short | An Assessment of Histological Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ |
title_sort | assessment of histological margins and recurrence of melanoma in situ |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joycekennethm anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT joycecormacw anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT jonesdeirdrem anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT donnellanpaul anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT husseyalanj anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT reganpadraicj anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT kellyjackl anassessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT joycekennethm assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT joycecormacw assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT jonesdeirdrem assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT donnellanpaul assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT husseyalanj assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT reganpadraicj assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu AT kellyjackl assessmentofhistologicalmarginsandrecurrenceofmelanomainsitu |