Cargando…

Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A., Howell, Lori K., Boutros, Shadi, Scott, Michelle A., Urata, Mark M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184
_version_ 1782360171992842240
author Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
Howell, Lori K.
Boutros, Shadi
Scott, Michelle A.
Urata, Mark M.
author_facet Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
Howell, Lori K.
Boutros, Shadi
Scott, Michelle A.
Urata, Mark M.
author_sort Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS: Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS: VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4350313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43503132015-03-06 Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. Howell, Lori K. Boutros, Shadi Scott, Michelle A. Urata, Mark M. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS: Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS: VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4350313/ /pubmed/25750846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
Howell, Lori K.
Boutros, Shadi
Scott, Michelle A.
Urata, Mark M.
Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title_full Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title_fullStr Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title_full_unstemmed Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title_short Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
title_sort current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3d surgical planning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184
work_keys_str_mv AT hammoudehjeffreya currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning
AT howelllorik currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning
AT boutrosshadi currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning
AT scottmichellea currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning
AT uratamarkm currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning