Cargando…
Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184 |
_version_ | 1782360171992842240 |
---|---|
author | Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. Howell, Lori K. Boutros, Shadi Scott, Michelle A. Urata, Mark M. |
author_facet | Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. Howell, Lori K. Boutros, Shadi Scott, Michelle A. Urata, Mark M. |
author_sort | Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS: Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS: VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4350313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43503132015-03-06 Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. Howell, Lori K. Boutros, Shadi Scott, Michelle A. Urata, Mark M. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS: Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS: VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4350313/ /pubmed/25750846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A. Howell, Lori K. Boutros, Shadi Scott, Michelle A. Urata, Mark M. Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title | Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title_full | Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title_fullStr | Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title_short | Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning |
title_sort | current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3d surgical planning |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammoudehjeffreya currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning AT howelllorik currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning AT boutrosshadi currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning AT scottmichellea currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning AT uratamarkm currentstatusofsurgicalplanningfororthognathicsurgerytraditionalmethodsversus3dsurgicalplanning |