Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()

AIM: SMAD4 immunohistochemistry is considered a valuable prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, but individual studies have often been small and the results variable. A meta-analysis could potentially clarify these findings. METHODS: In September 2014, a Pubmed and Google Scholar search was conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voorneveld, Philip W., Jacobs, Rutger J., Kodach, Liudmila L., Hardwick, James C.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.11.003
_version_ 1782360213089681408
author Voorneveld, Philip W.
Jacobs, Rutger J.
Kodach, Liudmila L.
Hardwick, James C.H.
author_facet Voorneveld, Philip W.
Jacobs, Rutger J.
Kodach, Liudmila L.
Hardwick, James C.H.
author_sort Voorneveld, Philip W.
collection PubMed
description AIM: SMAD4 immunohistochemistry is considered a valuable prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, but individual studies have often been small and the results variable. A meta-analysis could potentially clarify these findings. METHODS: In September 2014, a Pubmed and Google Scholar search was conducted to find publications that reported the prognostic value of SMAD4 expression. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between SMAD4 expression and survival outcomes. RESULTS: 137 studies were found, of which 13 were considered eligible. The studies consisted of a total of 3800 patients. Three different endpoints were taken into account, namely, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In addition, the studies were divided into univariate and multivariate analyses. The pooled hazard ratios were given as follows: univariate CSS = 1.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-3.32; z= 1.69; P= .09]; multivariate CSS = 2.17 (95% CI: 1.56-3.01; z= 4.65; P= .000); univariate DFS = 2.11 (95% CI: 1.36-3.28; z= 3.32; P= .001); multivariate DFS = 2.15 (95% CI: 1.56-3.01; z= 4.65; P= .000); univariate OS and DFS = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.41-3.73; z= 3.36; P= .001); univariate OS = 2.28 (95% CI: 1.30-4.00; z= 2.89; P= .004). CONCLUSION: The results of the presented meta-analyses indicate that SMAD4 expression status using immunohistochemistry is a prognostic marker for patient survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4350636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43506362015-03-09 A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()() Voorneveld, Philip W. Jacobs, Rutger J. Kodach, Liudmila L. Hardwick, James C.H. Transl Oncol Article AIM: SMAD4 immunohistochemistry is considered a valuable prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, but individual studies have often been small and the results variable. A meta-analysis could potentially clarify these findings. METHODS: In September 2014, a Pubmed and Google Scholar search was conducted to find publications that reported the prognostic value of SMAD4 expression. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between SMAD4 expression and survival outcomes. RESULTS: 137 studies were found, of which 13 were considered eligible. The studies consisted of a total of 3800 patients. Three different endpoints were taken into account, namely, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In addition, the studies were divided into univariate and multivariate analyses. The pooled hazard ratios were given as follows: univariate CSS = 1.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-3.32; z= 1.69; P= .09]; multivariate CSS = 2.17 (95% CI: 1.56-3.01; z= 4.65; P= .000); univariate DFS = 2.11 (95% CI: 1.36-3.28; z= 3.32; P= .001); multivariate DFS = 2.15 (95% CI: 1.56-3.01; z= 4.65; P= .000); univariate OS and DFS = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.41-3.73; z= 3.36; P= .001); univariate OS = 2.28 (95% CI: 1.30-4.00; z= 2.89; P= .004). CONCLUSION: The results of the presented meta-analyses indicate that SMAD4 expression status using immunohistochemistry is a prognostic marker for patient survival. Neoplasia Press 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4350636/ /pubmed/25749173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.11.003 Text en © 2014 Neoplasia Press, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Voorneveld, Philip W.
Jacobs, Rutger J.
Kodach, Liudmila L.
Hardwick, James C.H.
A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title_full A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title_short A Meta-Analysis of SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry as a Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer()()
title_sort meta-analysis of smad4 immunohistochemistry as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer()()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT voorneveldphilipw ametaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT jacobsrutgerj ametaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT kodachliudmilal ametaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT hardwickjamesch ametaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT voorneveldphilipw metaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT jacobsrutgerj metaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT kodachliudmilal metaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer
AT hardwickjamesch metaanalysisofsmad4immunohistochemistryasaprognosticmarkerincolorectalcancer