Cargando…

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index

BACKGROUND: The Spine Functional Index (SFI) is a patient reported outcome measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for the determination of whole-spine impairment. To date, no validated Turkish version is available. The purpose of this study is to cross-culturally adapted th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonga, Eda, Gabel, Charles Philip, Karayazgan, Sedef, Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3
_version_ 1782360264996290560
author Tonga, Eda
Gabel, Charles Philip
Karayazgan, Sedef
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I
author_facet Tonga, Eda
Gabel, Charles Philip
Karayazgan, Sedef
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I
author_sort Tonga, Eda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Spine Functional Index (SFI) is a patient reported outcome measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for the determination of whole-spine impairment. To date, no validated Turkish version is available. The purpose of this study is to cross-culturally adapted the SFI for Turkish-speaking patients (SFI-Tk) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability, validity and factor structure in a Turkish population with spine musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: The SFI English version was culturally adapted and translated into Turkish using a double forward and backward method according to established guidelines. Patients (n = 285, cervical = l29, lumbar = 151, cervical and lumbar region = 5, 73% female, age 45 ± 1) with spine musculoskeletal disorders completed the SFI-Tk at baseline and after a seven day period for test-retest reliability. For criterion validity the Turkish version of the Functional Rating Index (FRI) was used plus the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical patients and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back patients. Additional psychometric properties were determined for internal consistency (Chronbach’s α), criterion validity and factor structure. RESULTS: There was a high degree of internal consistency (α = 0.85, item range 0.80-0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.93, item range = 0.75-0.95). The factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution explaining 24.2% of total variance. Criterion validity with the ODI was high (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) while the FRI and NDI were fair (r = 0.52 and r = 0.58, respectively). The SFI-Tk showed no missing responses with the ‘half-mark’ option used in 11.75% of total responses by 77.9% of participants. Measurement error from SEM and MDC(90) were respectively 2.96% and 7.12%. CONCLUSIONS: The SFI-Tk demonstrated a one-factor solution and is a reliable and valid instrument. The SFI-Tk consists of simple and easily understood wording and may be used to assess spine region musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4350977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43509772015-03-06 Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index Tonga, Eda Gabel, Charles Philip Karayazgan, Sedef Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Spine Functional Index (SFI) is a patient reported outcome measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for the determination of whole-spine impairment. To date, no validated Turkish version is available. The purpose of this study is to cross-culturally adapted the SFI for Turkish-speaking patients (SFI-Tk) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability, validity and factor structure in a Turkish population with spine musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: The SFI English version was culturally adapted and translated into Turkish using a double forward and backward method according to established guidelines. Patients (n = 285, cervical = l29, lumbar = 151, cervical and lumbar region = 5, 73% female, age 45 ± 1) with spine musculoskeletal disorders completed the SFI-Tk at baseline and after a seven day period for test-retest reliability. For criterion validity the Turkish version of the Functional Rating Index (FRI) was used plus the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical patients and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back patients. Additional psychometric properties were determined for internal consistency (Chronbach’s α), criterion validity and factor structure. RESULTS: There was a high degree of internal consistency (α = 0.85, item range 0.80-0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.93, item range = 0.75-0.95). The factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution explaining 24.2% of total variance. Criterion validity with the ODI was high (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) while the FRI and NDI were fair (r = 0.52 and r = 0.58, respectively). The SFI-Tk showed no missing responses with the ‘half-mark’ option used in 11.75% of total responses by 77.9% of participants. Measurement error from SEM and MDC(90) were respectively 2.96% and 7.12%. CONCLUSIONS: The SFI-Tk demonstrated a one-factor solution and is a reliable and valid instrument. The SFI-Tk consists of simple and easily understood wording and may be used to assess spine region musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients. BioMed Central 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4350977/ /pubmed/25879743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3 Text en © Tonga et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tonga, Eda
Gabel, Charles Philip
Karayazgan, Sedef
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the turkish version of the spine functional index
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tongaeda crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT gabelcharlesphilip crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT karayazgansedef crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT cuestavargasantonioi crossculturaladaptationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthespinefunctionalindex