Cargando…

Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization

Functional preferences in the use of right/left forelimbs are not exclusively present in humans but have been widely documented in a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species. A matter of debate is whether non-human species exhibit a degree and consistency of functional forelimb asymmetries com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Versace, Elisabetta, Vallortigara, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00233
_version_ 1782360354048704512
author Versace, Elisabetta
Vallortigara, Giorgio
author_facet Versace, Elisabetta
Vallortigara, Giorgio
author_sort Versace, Elisabetta
collection PubMed
description Functional preferences in the use of right/left forelimbs are not exclusively present in humans but have been widely documented in a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species. A matter of debate is whether non-human species exhibit a degree and consistency of functional forelimb asymmetries comparable to human handedness. The comparison is made difficult by the variability in hand use in humans and the few comparable studies conducted on other species. In spite of this, interesting continuities appear in functions such as feeding, object manipulation and communicative gestures. Studies on invertebrates show how widespread forelimb preferences are among animals, and the importance of experience for the development of forelimb asymmetries. Vertebrate species have been extensively investigated to clarify the origins of forelimb functional asymmetries: comparative evidence shows that selective pressures for different functions have likely driven the evolution of human handedness. Evidence of a complex genetic architecture of human handedness is in line with the idea of multiple evolutionary origins of this trait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4351643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43516432015-03-20 Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization Versace, Elisabetta Vallortigara, Giorgio Front Psychol Psychology Functional preferences in the use of right/left forelimbs are not exclusively present in humans but have been widely documented in a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species. A matter of debate is whether non-human species exhibit a degree and consistency of functional forelimb asymmetries comparable to human handedness. The comparison is made difficult by the variability in hand use in humans and the few comparable studies conducted on other species. In spite of this, interesting continuities appear in functions such as feeding, object manipulation and communicative gestures. Studies on invertebrates show how widespread forelimb preferences are among animals, and the importance of experience for the development of forelimb asymmetries. Vertebrate species have been extensively investigated to clarify the origins of forelimb functional asymmetries: comparative evidence shows that selective pressures for different functions have likely driven the evolution of human handedness. Evidence of a complex genetic architecture of human handedness is in line with the idea of multiple evolutionary origins of this trait. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4351643/ /pubmed/25798121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00233 Text en Copyright © 2015 Versace and Vallortigara. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Versace, Elisabetta
Vallortigara, Giorgio
Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title_full Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title_fullStr Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title_full_unstemmed Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title_short Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
title_sort forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00233
work_keys_str_mv AT versaceelisabetta forelimbpreferencesinhumanbeingsandotherspeciesmultiplemodelsfortestinghypothesesonlateralization
AT vallortigaragiorgio forelimbpreferencesinhumanbeingsandotherspeciesmultiplemodelsfortestinghypothesesonlateralization