Cargando…

GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014

BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercer, Annette, Crotty, Brendan, Alldridge, Louise, Le, Luc, Vele, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3
_version_ 1782360360875982848
author Mercer, Annette
Crotty, Brendan
Alldridge, Louise
Le, Luc
Vele, Veronica
author_facet Mercer, Annette
Crotty, Brendan
Alldridge, Louise
Le, Luc
Vele, Veronica
author_sort Mercer, Annette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this study was to review the performance of the GAMSAT over the last 10 years; the study provides an analysis of the impact of candidates’ gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and background discipline on performance; and details on the performance of higher-scoring candidates. These analyses were undertaken on the 2014 data; and trends in the data over the 10-year period are noted. METHODS: In reviewing performance, the main variables considered were: – Overall GAMSAT score and scores for Section 1, Reasoning in Humanities and Social Sciences, Section 2, Written Communication, and Section 3, Reasoning in Biological and Physical Sciences. – Proportions of candidates achieving a Typical Entry Score. – Impact of gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and undergraduate course (i.e. subject discipline) on test scores. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were applied to determine the impact of demographic variables on performance. RESULTS: The number of candidates is increasing. Test reliability is consistently high. Higher scores overall are more likely for candidates who are male; are less than 24 years old; have an English-speaking background; have an Honours degree or a doctorate; and have completed a degree which is not health-related. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GAMSAT exam over the last 10 years has been stable with high reliability. There are significant variations in candidate performance related to age, gender, level and discipline of previous academic study and language background. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4351698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43516982015-03-07 GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 Mercer, Annette Crotty, Brendan Alldridge, Louise Le, Luc Vele, Veronica BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this study was to review the performance of the GAMSAT over the last 10 years; the study provides an analysis of the impact of candidates’ gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and background discipline on performance; and details on the performance of higher-scoring candidates. These analyses were undertaken on the 2014 data; and trends in the data over the 10-year period are noted. METHODS: In reviewing performance, the main variables considered were: – Overall GAMSAT score and scores for Section 1, Reasoning in Humanities and Social Sciences, Section 2, Written Communication, and Section 3, Reasoning in Biological and Physical Sciences. – Proportions of candidates achieving a Typical Entry Score. – Impact of gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and undergraduate course (i.e. subject discipline) on test scores. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were applied to determine the impact of demographic variables on performance. RESULTS: The number of candidates is increasing. Test reliability is consistently high. Higher scores overall are more likely for candidates who are male; are less than 24 years old; have an English-speaking background; have an Honours degree or a doctorate; and have completed a degree which is not health-related. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GAMSAT exam over the last 10 years has been stable with high reliability. There are significant variations in candidate performance related to age, gender, level and discipline of previous academic study and language background. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4351698/ /pubmed/25889535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3 Text en © Mercer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mercer, Annette
Crotty, Brendan
Alldridge, Louise
Le, Luc
Vele, Veronica
GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title_full GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title_fullStr GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title_full_unstemmed GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title_short GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
title_sort gamsat: a 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mercerannette gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014
AT crottybrendan gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014
AT alldridgelouise gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014
AT leluc gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014
AT veleveronica gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014