Cargando…
GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014
BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3 |
_version_ | 1782360360875982848 |
---|---|
author | Mercer, Annette Crotty, Brendan Alldridge, Louise Le, Luc Vele, Veronica |
author_facet | Mercer, Annette Crotty, Brendan Alldridge, Louise Le, Luc Vele, Veronica |
author_sort | Mercer, Annette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this study was to review the performance of the GAMSAT over the last 10 years; the study provides an analysis of the impact of candidates’ gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and background discipline on performance; and details on the performance of higher-scoring candidates. These analyses were undertaken on the 2014 data; and trends in the data over the 10-year period are noted. METHODS: In reviewing performance, the main variables considered were: – Overall GAMSAT score and scores for Section 1, Reasoning in Humanities and Social Sciences, Section 2, Written Communication, and Section 3, Reasoning in Biological and Physical Sciences. – Proportions of candidates achieving a Typical Entry Score. – Impact of gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and undergraduate course (i.e. subject discipline) on test scores. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were applied to determine the impact of demographic variables on performance. RESULTS: The number of candidates is increasing. Test reliability is consistently high. Higher scores overall are more likely for candidates who are male; are less than 24 years old; have an English-speaking background; have an Honours degree or a doctorate; and have completed a degree which is not health-related. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GAMSAT exam over the last 10 years has been stable with high reliability. There are significant variations in candidate performance related to age, gender, level and discipline of previous academic study and language background. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4351698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43516982015-03-07 GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 Mercer, Annette Crotty, Brendan Alldridge, Louise Le, Luc Vele, Veronica BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The Graduate Australian Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT) is undertaken annually in centres around Australia and a small number of overseas locations. Most Australian graduate entry medical schools also use Grade Point Average and interview score for selection. The aim of this study was to review the performance of the GAMSAT over the last 10 years; the study provides an analysis of the impact of candidates’ gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and background discipline on performance; and details on the performance of higher-scoring candidates. These analyses were undertaken on the 2014 data; and trends in the data over the 10-year period are noted. METHODS: In reviewing performance, the main variables considered were: – Overall GAMSAT score and scores for Section 1, Reasoning in Humanities and Social Sciences, Section 2, Written Communication, and Section 3, Reasoning in Biological and Physical Sciences. – Proportions of candidates achieving a Typical Entry Score. – Impact of gender, age, language background, level of academic qualification and undergraduate course (i.e. subject discipline) on test scores. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were applied to determine the impact of demographic variables on performance. RESULTS: The number of candidates is increasing. Test reliability is consistently high. Higher scores overall are more likely for candidates who are male; are less than 24 years old; have an English-speaking background; have an Honours degree or a doctorate; and have completed a degree which is not health-related. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GAMSAT exam over the last 10 years has been stable with high reliability. There are significant variations in candidate performance related to age, gender, level and discipline of previous academic study and language background. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4351698/ /pubmed/25889535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3 Text en © Mercer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mercer, Annette Crotty, Brendan Alldridge, Louise Le, Luc Vele, Veronica GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title | GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title_full | GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title_fullStr | GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title_full_unstemmed | GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title_short | GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
title_sort | gamsat: a 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates’ performance in 2014 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0316-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercerannette gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014 AT crottybrendan gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014 AT alldridgelouise gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014 AT leluc gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014 AT veleveronica gamsata10yearretrospectiveoverviewwithdetailedanalysisofcandidatesperformancein2014 |