Cargando…

A critical review of population health literacy assessment

BACKGROUND: Defining health literacy from a public health perspective places greater emphasis on the knowledge and skills required to prevent disease and for promoting health in everyday life. Addressing health literacy at the community level provides great potential for improving health knowledge,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guzys, Diana, Kenny, Amanda, Dickson-Swift, Virginia, Threlkeld, Guinever
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1551-6
_version_ 1782360380760129536
author Guzys, Diana
Kenny, Amanda
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Threlkeld, Guinever
author_facet Guzys, Diana
Kenny, Amanda
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Threlkeld, Guinever
author_sort Guzys, Diana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Defining health literacy from a public health perspective places greater emphasis on the knowledge and skills required to prevent disease and for promoting health in everyday life. Addressing health literacy at the community level provides great potential for improving health knowledge, skills and behaviours resulting in better health outcomes. Yet there is a notable absence of discussion in the literature of what a health literate population looks like, or how this is best assessed. DISCUSSION: The emphasis in assessing health literacy has predominantly focused on the functional health literacy of individuals in clinical settings. This review examines currently available health literacy assessment tools to identify how well suited they are in addressing health literacy beyond clinical care settings and beyond the individual. Although public health literature appears to place greater emphasis on conceptualizing critical health literacy, the focus continues to remain on assessing individuals, rather than on health literacy within the context of families, communities and population groups. When a population approach is adopted, an aggregate of individual health literacy assessment is generally used. Aggregation of individual health literacy fails to capture the dynamic and often synergistic relationships within communities, and fails to reflect societal influences on health knowledge, beliefs and behaviours. We hypothesise that a different assessment framework is required to adequately address the complexities of community health literacy. We assert that a public health approach, founded on health promotion theories provides a useful scaffold to assess the critical health literacy of population groups. It is proposed that inclusion of community members in the research process is a necessary requirement to coproduce such an appropriate assessment framework. SUMMARY: We contend that health literacy assessment and potential interventions need to shift to promoting the knowledge and skills essential for critical health literacy at a societal level. The challenge for researchers is to negotiate the myriad of complexities associated with each concept and component required for this task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4351936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43519362015-03-07 A critical review of population health literacy assessment Guzys, Diana Kenny, Amanda Dickson-Swift, Virginia Threlkeld, Guinever BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: Defining health literacy from a public health perspective places greater emphasis on the knowledge and skills required to prevent disease and for promoting health in everyday life. Addressing health literacy at the community level provides great potential for improving health knowledge, skills and behaviours resulting in better health outcomes. Yet there is a notable absence of discussion in the literature of what a health literate population looks like, or how this is best assessed. DISCUSSION: The emphasis in assessing health literacy has predominantly focused on the functional health literacy of individuals in clinical settings. This review examines currently available health literacy assessment tools to identify how well suited they are in addressing health literacy beyond clinical care settings and beyond the individual. Although public health literature appears to place greater emphasis on conceptualizing critical health literacy, the focus continues to remain on assessing individuals, rather than on health literacy within the context of families, communities and population groups. When a population approach is adopted, an aggregate of individual health literacy assessment is generally used. Aggregation of individual health literacy fails to capture the dynamic and often synergistic relationships within communities, and fails to reflect societal influences on health knowledge, beliefs and behaviours. We hypothesise that a different assessment framework is required to adequately address the complexities of community health literacy. We assert that a public health approach, founded on health promotion theories provides a useful scaffold to assess the critical health literacy of population groups. It is proposed that inclusion of community members in the research process is a necessary requirement to coproduce such an appropriate assessment framework. SUMMARY: We contend that health literacy assessment and potential interventions need to shift to promoting the knowledge and skills essential for critical health literacy at a societal level. The challenge for researchers is to negotiate the myriad of complexities associated with each concept and component required for this task. BioMed Central 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4351936/ /pubmed/25885742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1551-6 Text en © Guzys et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Guzys, Diana
Kenny, Amanda
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Threlkeld, Guinever
A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title_full A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title_fullStr A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title_short A critical review of population health literacy assessment
title_sort critical review of population health literacy assessment
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1551-6
work_keys_str_mv AT guzysdiana acriticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT kennyamanda acriticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT dicksonswiftvirginia acriticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT threlkeldguinever acriticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT guzysdiana criticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT kennyamanda criticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT dicksonswiftvirginia criticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment
AT threlkeldguinever criticalreviewofpopulationhealthliteracyassessment