Cargando…

Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment

OBJECTIVE: To determine the live birth and cumulative live birth rates of expected poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria and to compare their outcomes with those of expected normal responders DESIGN: Retrospective analysis SETTING: University infertility clinic PATIENTS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chai, Joyce, Lee, Vivian Chi-Yan, Yeung, Tracy Wing-Yee, Li, Raymond Wun-Hang, Ho, Pak-Chung, Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25748478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119149
_version_ 1782360385836285952
author Chai, Joyce
Lee, Vivian Chi-Yan
Yeung, Tracy Wing-Yee
Li, Raymond Wun-Hang
Ho, Pak-Chung
Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu
author_facet Chai, Joyce
Lee, Vivian Chi-Yan
Yeung, Tracy Wing-Yee
Li, Raymond Wun-Hang
Ho, Pak-Chung
Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu
author_sort Chai, Joyce
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the live birth and cumulative live birth rates of expected poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria and to compare their outcomes with those of expected normal responders DESIGN: Retrospective analysis SETTING: University infertility clinic PATIENTS: A total of 1,152 subfertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle INTERVENTIONS: Women were classified into 4 groups according to the Bologna criteria for comparison MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth and cumulative live birth rates RESULTS: Women with expected poor response (POR) had the lowest live birth rate than the other 3 groups (23.8%, p = 0.031). Cumulative live birth rates were significantly lower in those with expected POR than those with expected normal ovarian response (NOR) (35.8% vs 62.8%, p<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, the cumulative live birth rates in expected PORs were significantly lower in those who had ≤3 oocytes retrieved (18.6% for ≤3 oocytes vs 44.0% for >3 oocytes, p = 0.006) whereas the live birth rates in fresh cycle did not differ (17.8% vs 30.9%, p = 0.108). CONCLUSION: Women who were expected POR according to the Bologna criteria had lower live birth and cumulative live birth than expected NOR but they still can achieve reasonable treatment outcomes and IVF treatment should not be precluded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4351960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43519602015-03-17 Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment Chai, Joyce Lee, Vivian Chi-Yan Yeung, Tracy Wing-Yee Li, Raymond Wun-Hang Ho, Pak-Chung Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the live birth and cumulative live birth rates of expected poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria and to compare their outcomes with those of expected normal responders DESIGN: Retrospective analysis SETTING: University infertility clinic PATIENTS: A total of 1,152 subfertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle INTERVENTIONS: Women were classified into 4 groups according to the Bologna criteria for comparison MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth and cumulative live birth rates RESULTS: Women with expected poor response (POR) had the lowest live birth rate than the other 3 groups (23.8%, p = 0.031). Cumulative live birth rates were significantly lower in those with expected POR than those with expected normal ovarian response (NOR) (35.8% vs 62.8%, p<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, the cumulative live birth rates in expected PORs were significantly lower in those who had ≤3 oocytes retrieved (18.6% for ≤3 oocytes vs 44.0% for >3 oocytes, p = 0.006) whereas the live birth rates in fresh cycle did not differ (17.8% vs 30.9%, p = 0.108). CONCLUSION: Women who were expected POR according to the Bologna criteria had lower live birth and cumulative live birth than expected NOR but they still can achieve reasonable treatment outcomes and IVF treatment should not be precluded. Public Library of Science 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4351960/ /pubmed/25748478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119149 Text en © 2015 Chai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chai, Joyce
Lee, Vivian Chi-Yan
Yeung, Tracy Wing-Yee
Li, Raymond Wun-Hang
Ho, Pak-Chung
Ng, Ernest Hung-Yu
Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title_full Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title_fullStr Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title_short Live Birth and Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Expected Poor Ovarian Responders Defined by the Bologna Criteria Following IVF/ICSI Treatment
title_sort live birth and cumulative live birth rates in expected poor ovarian responders defined by the bologna criteria following ivf/icsi treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25748478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119149
work_keys_str_mv AT chaijoyce livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment
AT leevivianchiyan livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment
AT yeungtracywingyee livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment
AT liraymondwunhang livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment
AT hopakchung livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment
AT ngernesthungyu livebirthandcumulativelivebirthratesinexpectedpoorovarianrespondersdefinedbythebolognacriteriafollowingivficsitreatment