Cargando…

Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI

Previous evidence showed that, due to refocusing of static dephasing effects around large vessels, spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, even at low field. These characteristics suggest that, despite the reduced sensit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiacchiaretta, Piero, Ferretti, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120398
_version_ 1782360408784371712
author Chiacchiaretta, Piero
Ferretti, Antonio
author_facet Chiacchiaretta, Piero
Ferretti, Antonio
author_sort Chiacchiaretta, Piero
collection PubMed
description Previous evidence showed that, due to refocusing of static dephasing effects around large vessels, spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, even at low field. These characteristics suggest that, despite the reduced sensitivity, SE fMRI might also provide a potential benefit when investigating spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity. However, there are no reports on the application of spin-echo fMRI for connectivity studies at low field. In this study we compared resting state functional connectivity as measured with GE and SE EPI sequences at 3T. Main results showed that, within subject, the GE sensitivity is overall larger with respect to that of SE, but to a less extent than previously reported for activation studies. Noteworthy, the reduced sensitivity of SE was counterbalanced by a reduced inter-subject variability, resulting in comparable group statistical connectivity maps for the two sequences. Furthermore, the SE method performed better in the ventral portion of the default mode network, a region affected by signal dropout in standard GE acquisition. Future studies should clarify if these features of the SE BOLD signal can be beneficial to distinguish subtle variations of functional connectivity across different populations and/or treatments when vascular confounds or regions affected by signal dropout can be a critical issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4352074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43520742015-03-17 Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI Chiacchiaretta, Piero Ferretti, Antonio PLoS One Research Article Previous evidence showed that, due to refocusing of static dephasing effects around large vessels, spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, even at low field. These characteristics suggest that, despite the reduced sensitivity, SE fMRI might also provide a potential benefit when investigating spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity. However, there are no reports on the application of spin-echo fMRI for connectivity studies at low field. In this study we compared resting state functional connectivity as measured with GE and SE EPI sequences at 3T. Main results showed that, within subject, the GE sensitivity is overall larger with respect to that of SE, but to a less extent than previously reported for activation studies. Noteworthy, the reduced sensitivity of SE was counterbalanced by a reduced inter-subject variability, resulting in comparable group statistical connectivity maps for the two sequences. Furthermore, the SE method performed better in the ventral portion of the default mode network, a region affected by signal dropout in standard GE acquisition. Future studies should clarify if these features of the SE BOLD signal can be beneficial to distinguish subtle variations of functional connectivity across different populations and/or treatments when vascular confounds or regions affected by signal dropout can be a critical issue. Public Library of Science 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4352074/ /pubmed/25749359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120398 Text en © 2015 Chiacchiaretta, Ferretti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiacchiaretta, Piero
Ferretti, Antonio
Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title_full Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title_fullStr Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title_full_unstemmed Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title_short Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI
title_sort resting state bold functional connectivity at 3t: spin echo versus gradient echo epi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120398
work_keys_str_mv AT chiacchiarettapiero restingstateboldfunctionalconnectivityat3tspinechoversusgradientechoepi
AT ferrettiantonio restingstateboldfunctionalconnectivityat3tspinechoversusgradientechoepi