Cargando…

Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units

BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jokhan, Stephanie, Whitworth, Melissa K, Jones, Felicity, Saunders, Ashleigh, Heazell, Alexander E P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5
_version_ 1782360432310222848
author Jokhan, Stephanie
Whitworth, Melissa K
Jones, Felicity
Saunders, Ashleigh
Heazell, Alexander E P
author_facet Jokhan, Stephanie
Whitworth, Melissa K
Jones, Felicity
Saunders, Ashleigh
Heazell, Alexander E P
author_sort Jokhan, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements (RFM), which can be an important symptom of fetal compromise. Following dissemination it was anticipated that this guidance would be implemented in UK maternity units. This study aimed to assess the quality of local guidelines for the management of RFM in comparison to published national standards. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of maternity unit guidelines for RFM. The guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool and scored by two independent investigators. Two national guidelines were used as standards to evaluate unit guidelines. RESULTS: Responses were received from 98 units (42%); 12 units had no guideline. National guidelines scored highly using the AGREE II tool but there was wide variation in the quality of individual maternity unit guidelines, which were frequently of low quality. No guidelines incorporated all the recommendations from the national guideline. Maternity unit guidelines performed well for clarity and presentation but had low scores for stakeholder involvement, rigour of development and applicability. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to national evidence based guidance the quality of maternity unit guidelines for RFM is variable and frequently of low quality. To increase quality, guidelines need to include up to date evidence and audit standards which could be taken directly from national evidence-based guidance. Barriers to local implementation and resource implications need to be taken into consideration. Training may also improve the implementation of the guideline. Research is needed to inform strategies to realize the benefits of clinical guidance in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4352260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43522602015-03-08 Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units Jokhan, Stephanie Whitworth, Melissa K Jones, Felicity Saunders, Ashleigh Heazell, Alexander E P BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements (RFM), which can be an important symptom of fetal compromise. Following dissemination it was anticipated that this guidance would be implemented in UK maternity units. This study aimed to assess the quality of local guidelines for the management of RFM in comparison to published national standards. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of maternity unit guidelines for RFM. The guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool and scored by two independent investigators. Two national guidelines were used as standards to evaluate unit guidelines. RESULTS: Responses were received from 98 units (42%); 12 units had no guideline. National guidelines scored highly using the AGREE II tool but there was wide variation in the quality of individual maternity unit guidelines, which were frequently of low quality. No guidelines incorporated all the recommendations from the national guideline. Maternity unit guidelines performed well for clarity and presentation but had low scores for stakeholder involvement, rigour of development and applicability. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to national evidence based guidance the quality of maternity unit guidelines for RFM is variable and frequently of low quality. To increase quality, guidelines need to include up to date evidence and audit standards which could be taken directly from national evidence-based guidance. Barriers to local implementation and resource implications need to be taken into consideration. Training may also improve the implementation of the guideline. Research is needed to inform strategies to realize the benefits of clinical guidance in practice. BioMed Central 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4352260/ /pubmed/25884544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5 Text en © Jokhan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jokhan, Stephanie
Whitworth, Melissa K
Jones, Felicity
Saunders, Ashleigh
Heazell, Alexander E P
Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title_full Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title_fullStr Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title_short Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
title_sort evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in uk maternity units
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jokhanstephanie evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits
AT whitworthmelissak evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits
AT jonesfelicity evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits
AT saundersashleigh evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits
AT heazellalexanderep evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits