Cargando…
Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units
BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5 |
_version_ | 1782360432310222848 |
---|---|
author | Jokhan, Stephanie Whitworth, Melissa K Jones, Felicity Saunders, Ashleigh Heazell, Alexander E P |
author_facet | Jokhan, Stephanie Whitworth, Melissa K Jones, Felicity Saunders, Ashleigh Heazell, Alexander E P |
author_sort | Jokhan, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements (RFM), which can be an important symptom of fetal compromise. Following dissemination it was anticipated that this guidance would be implemented in UK maternity units. This study aimed to assess the quality of local guidelines for the management of RFM in comparison to published national standards. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of maternity unit guidelines for RFM. The guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool and scored by two independent investigators. Two national guidelines were used as standards to evaluate unit guidelines. RESULTS: Responses were received from 98 units (42%); 12 units had no guideline. National guidelines scored highly using the AGREE II tool but there was wide variation in the quality of individual maternity unit guidelines, which were frequently of low quality. No guidelines incorporated all the recommendations from the national guideline. Maternity unit guidelines performed well for clarity and presentation but had low scores for stakeholder involvement, rigour of development and applicability. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to national evidence based guidance the quality of maternity unit guidelines for RFM is variable and frequently of low quality. To increase quality, guidelines need to include up to date evidence and audit standards which could be taken directly from national evidence-based guidance. Barriers to local implementation and resource implications need to be taken into consideration. Training may also improve the implementation of the guideline. Research is needed to inform strategies to realize the benefits of clinical guidance in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4352260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43522602015-03-08 Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units Jokhan, Stephanie Whitworth, Melissa K Jones, Felicity Saunders, Ashleigh Heazell, Alexander E P BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The development of evidence-based guidelines is a key step in ensuring that maternity care is of a universally high standard. To influence patient care national and international guidelines need to be interpreted and implemented locally. In 2011, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements (RFM), which can be an important symptom of fetal compromise. Following dissemination it was anticipated that this guidance would be implemented in UK maternity units. This study aimed to assess the quality of local guidelines for the management of RFM in comparison to published national standards. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of maternity unit guidelines for RFM. The guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Tool and scored by two independent investigators. Two national guidelines were used as standards to evaluate unit guidelines. RESULTS: Responses were received from 98 units (42%); 12 units had no guideline. National guidelines scored highly using the AGREE II tool but there was wide variation in the quality of individual maternity unit guidelines, which were frequently of low quality. No guidelines incorporated all the recommendations from the national guideline. Maternity unit guidelines performed well for clarity and presentation but had low scores for stakeholder involvement, rigour of development and applicability. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to national evidence based guidance the quality of maternity unit guidelines for RFM is variable and frequently of low quality. To increase quality, guidelines need to include up to date evidence and audit standards which could be taken directly from national evidence-based guidance. Barriers to local implementation and resource implications need to be taken into consideration. Training may also improve the implementation of the guideline. Research is needed to inform strategies to realize the benefits of clinical guidance in practice. BioMed Central 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4352260/ /pubmed/25884544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5 Text en © Jokhan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jokhan, Stephanie Whitworth, Melissa K Jones, Felicity Saunders, Ashleigh Heazell, Alexander E P Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title | Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title_full | Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title_short | Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units |
title_sort | evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in uk maternity units |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jokhanstephanie evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits AT whitworthmelissak evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits AT jonesfelicity evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits AT saundersashleigh evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits AT heazellalexanderep evaluationofthequalityofguidelinesforthemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsinukmaternityunits |