Cargando…

The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study

BACKGROUND: The ‘Adaptive Designs Accelerating Promising Trials into Treatments (ADAPT-IT)’ project is a collaborative effort supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to explore how adaptive clinical trial design might improve the ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connor, Jason T, Broglio, Kristine R, Durkalski, Valerie, Meurer, William J, Johnston, Karen C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0574-8
_version_ 1782360436265451520
author Connor, Jason T
Broglio, Kristine R
Durkalski, Valerie
Meurer, William J
Johnston, Karen C
author_facet Connor, Jason T
Broglio, Kristine R
Durkalski, Valerie
Meurer, William J
Johnston, Karen C
author_sort Connor, Jason T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘Adaptive Designs Accelerating Promising Trials into Treatments (ADAPT-IT)’ project is a collaborative effort supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to explore how adaptive clinical trial design might improve the evaluation of drugs and medical devices. ADAPT-IT uses the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders & Stroke-supported Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) network as a ‘laboratory’ in which to study the development of adaptive clinical trial designs in the confirmatory setting. The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial was selected for funding by the NIH-NINDS at the start of ADAPT-IT and is currently an ongoing phase III trial of tight glucose control in hyperglycemic acute ischemic stroke patients. Within ADAPT-IT, a Bayesian adaptive Goldilocks trial design alternative was developed. METHODS: The SHINE design includes response adaptive randomization, a sample size re-estimation, and monitoring for early efficacy and futility according to a group sequential design. The Goldilocks design includes more frequent monitoring for predicted success or futility and a longitudinal model of the primary endpoint. Both trial designs were simulated and compared in terms of their mean sample size and power across a range of treatment effects and success rates for the control group. RESULTS: As simulated, the SHINE design tends to have slightly higher power and the Goldilocks design has a lower mean sample size. Both designs were tuned to have approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 25% versus 32% between control and treatment, respectively. In this scenario, mean sample sizes are 1,114 and 979 for the SHINE and Goldilocks designs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two designs were brought forward, and both were evaluated, revised, and improved based on the input of all parties involved in the ADAPT-IT process. However, the SHINE investigators were tasked with choosing only a single design to implement and ultimately elected not to implement the Goldilocks design. The Goldilocks design will be retrospectively executed upon completion of SHINE to later compare the designs based on their use of patient resources, time, and conclusions in a real world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01369069 June 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4352277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43522772015-03-08 The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study Connor, Jason T Broglio, Kristine R Durkalski, Valerie Meurer, William J Johnston, Karen C Trials Research BACKGROUND: The ‘Adaptive Designs Accelerating Promising Trials into Treatments (ADAPT-IT)’ project is a collaborative effort supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to explore how adaptive clinical trial design might improve the evaluation of drugs and medical devices. ADAPT-IT uses the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders & Stroke-supported Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials (NETT) network as a ‘laboratory’ in which to study the development of adaptive clinical trial designs in the confirmatory setting. The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial was selected for funding by the NIH-NINDS at the start of ADAPT-IT and is currently an ongoing phase III trial of tight glucose control in hyperglycemic acute ischemic stroke patients. Within ADAPT-IT, a Bayesian adaptive Goldilocks trial design alternative was developed. METHODS: The SHINE design includes response adaptive randomization, a sample size re-estimation, and monitoring for early efficacy and futility according to a group sequential design. The Goldilocks design includes more frequent monitoring for predicted success or futility and a longitudinal model of the primary endpoint. Both trial designs were simulated and compared in terms of their mean sample size and power across a range of treatment effects and success rates for the control group. RESULTS: As simulated, the SHINE design tends to have slightly higher power and the Goldilocks design has a lower mean sample size. Both designs were tuned to have approximately 80% power to detect a difference of 25% versus 32% between control and treatment, respectively. In this scenario, mean sample sizes are 1,114 and 979 for the SHINE and Goldilocks designs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two designs were brought forward, and both were evaluated, revised, and improved based on the input of all parties involved in the ADAPT-IT process. However, the SHINE investigators were tasked with choosing only a single design to implement and ultimately elected not to implement the Goldilocks design. The Goldilocks design will be retrospectively executed upon completion of SHINE to later compare the designs based on their use of patient resources, time, and conclusions in a real world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01369069 June 2011. BioMed Central 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4352277/ /pubmed/25885963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0574-8 Text en © Connor et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Connor, Jason T
Broglio, Kristine R
Durkalski, Valerie
Meurer, William J
Johnston, Karen C
The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title_full The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title_fullStr The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title_full_unstemmed The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title_short The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
title_sort stroke hyperglycemia insulin network effort (shine) trial: an adaptive trial design case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0574-8
work_keys_str_mv AT connorjasont thestrokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT brogliokristiner thestrokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT durkalskivalerie thestrokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT meurerwilliamj thestrokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT johnstonkarenc thestrokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT connorjasont strokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT brogliokristiner strokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT durkalskivalerie strokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT meurerwilliamj strokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy
AT johnstonkarenc strokehyperglycemiainsulinnetworkeffortshinetrialanadaptivetrialdesigncasestudy