Cargando…

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes

BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouimet, Marie Claude, Dongier, Maurice, Di Leo, Ivana, Legault, Lucie, Tremblay, Jacques, Chanut, Florence, Brown, Thomas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180
_version_ 1782360441336365056
author Ouimet, Marie Claude
Dongier, Maurice
Di Leo, Ivana
Legault, Lucie
Tremblay, Jacques
Chanut, Florence
Brown, Thomas G
author_facet Ouimet, Marie Claude
Dongier, Maurice
Di Leo, Ivana
Legault, Lucie
Tremblay, Jacques
Chanut, Florence
Brown, Thomas G
author_sort Ouimet, Marie Claude
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivists than a control information–advice intervention at 12-month follow-up. In this sequel to the initial study, 2 main hypotheses were tested: (i) exposure to BMI increases the time to further arrests and crashes compared with exposure to the control intervention (CTL) and (ii) characteristics, such as age, moderate the benefit of BMI. METHODS: A sample of 180 community-recruited recidivists who had drinking problems participated in the study. Participants gave access to their provincial driving records at baseline and were followed up for a mean of 1,684.5 days (SD = 155.7) after randomization to a 30-minute BMI or CTL session. Measured outcomes were driving arrests followed by convictions including driving while impaired (DWI), speeding, or other moving violations as well as crashes. Age, readiness to change alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse severity, and number of previous DWI convictions were included as potential moderators of the effect of the interventions. RESULTS: For arrests, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed no significant differences between the BMI and the CTL group. When analyses were adjusted to age tertile categories, a significant effect of BMI in the youngest age tertile (<43 years old) emerged. For crashes, no between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was better at delaying DWI and other dangerous traffic violations in at-risk younger drivers compared with a CTL similar to that provided in many remedial programs. BMI may be useful as an opportunistic intervention for DWI recidivism prevention in settings such as DWI courts. Treatment effectiveness studies are needed to ascertain how the present findings generalize to the real-world conditions of mandated relicensing programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4352330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43523302015-03-27 A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes Ouimet, Marie Claude Dongier, Maurice Di Leo, Ivana Legault, Lucie Tremblay, Jacques Chanut, Florence Brown, Thomas G Alcohol Clin Exp Res Behavior, Treatment and Prevention BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivists than a control information–advice intervention at 12-month follow-up. In this sequel to the initial study, 2 main hypotheses were tested: (i) exposure to BMI increases the time to further arrests and crashes compared with exposure to the control intervention (CTL) and (ii) characteristics, such as age, moderate the benefit of BMI. METHODS: A sample of 180 community-recruited recidivists who had drinking problems participated in the study. Participants gave access to their provincial driving records at baseline and were followed up for a mean of 1,684.5 days (SD = 155.7) after randomization to a 30-minute BMI or CTL session. Measured outcomes were driving arrests followed by convictions including driving while impaired (DWI), speeding, or other moving violations as well as crashes. Age, readiness to change alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse severity, and number of previous DWI convictions were included as potential moderators of the effect of the interventions. RESULTS: For arrests, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed no significant differences between the BMI and the CTL group. When analyses were adjusted to age tertile categories, a significant effect of BMI in the youngest age tertile (<43 years old) emerged. For crashes, no between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was better at delaying DWI and other dangerous traffic violations in at-risk younger drivers compared with a CTL similar to that provided in many remedial programs. BMI may be useful as an opportunistic intervention for DWI recidivism prevention in settings such as DWI courts. Treatment effectiveness studies are needed to ascertain how the present findings generalize to the real-world conditions of mandated relicensing programs. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013-11 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4352330/ /pubmed/23895363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Research Society on Alcoholism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Behavior, Treatment and Prevention
Ouimet, Marie Claude
Dongier, Maurice
Di Leo, Ivana
Legault, Lucie
Tremblay, Jacques
Chanut, Florence
Brown, Thomas G
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title_full A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title_fullStr A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title_short A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
title_sort randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: a 5-year follow-up of traffic offenses and crashes
topic Behavior, Treatment and Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180
work_keys_str_mv AT ouimetmarieclaude arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT dongiermaurice arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT dileoivana arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT legaultlucie arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT tremblayjacques arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT chanutflorence arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT brownthomasg arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT ouimetmarieclaude randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT dongiermaurice randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT dileoivana randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT legaultlucie randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT tremblayjacques randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT chanutflorence randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes
AT brownthomasg randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes