Cargando…
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes
BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180 |
_version_ | 1782360441336365056 |
---|---|
author | Ouimet, Marie Claude Dongier, Maurice Di Leo, Ivana Legault, Lucie Tremblay, Jacques Chanut, Florence Brown, Thomas G |
author_facet | Ouimet, Marie Claude Dongier, Maurice Di Leo, Ivana Legault, Lucie Tremblay, Jacques Chanut, Florence Brown, Thomas G |
author_sort | Ouimet, Marie Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivists than a control information–advice intervention at 12-month follow-up. In this sequel to the initial study, 2 main hypotheses were tested: (i) exposure to BMI increases the time to further arrests and crashes compared with exposure to the control intervention (CTL) and (ii) characteristics, such as age, moderate the benefit of BMI. METHODS: A sample of 180 community-recruited recidivists who had drinking problems participated in the study. Participants gave access to their provincial driving records at baseline and were followed up for a mean of 1,684.5 days (SD = 155.7) after randomization to a 30-minute BMI or CTL session. Measured outcomes were driving arrests followed by convictions including driving while impaired (DWI), speeding, or other moving violations as well as crashes. Age, readiness to change alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse severity, and number of previous DWI convictions were included as potential moderators of the effect of the interventions. RESULTS: For arrests, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed no significant differences between the BMI and the CTL group. When analyses were adjusted to age tertile categories, a significant effect of BMI in the youngest age tertile (<43 years old) emerged. For crashes, no between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was better at delaying DWI and other dangerous traffic violations in at-risk younger drivers compared with a CTL similar to that provided in many remedial programs. BMI may be useful as an opportunistic intervention for DWI recidivism prevention in settings such as DWI courts. Treatment effectiveness studies are needed to ascertain how the present findings generalize to the real-world conditions of mandated relicensing programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4352330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43523302015-03-27 A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes Ouimet, Marie Claude Dongier, Maurice Di Leo, Ivana Legault, Lucie Tremblay, Jacques Chanut, Florence Brown, Thomas G Alcohol Clin Exp Res Behavior, Treatment and Prevention BACKGROUND: In a previously published randomized controlled trial (Brown et al. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34, 292–301), our research team showed that a 30-minute brief motivational interviewing (BMI) session was more effective in reducing percentages of risky drinking days in drunk driving recidivists than a control information–advice intervention at 12-month follow-up. In this sequel to the initial study, 2 main hypotheses were tested: (i) exposure to BMI increases the time to further arrests and crashes compared with exposure to the control intervention (CTL) and (ii) characteristics, such as age, moderate the benefit of BMI. METHODS: A sample of 180 community-recruited recidivists who had drinking problems participated in the study. Participants gave access to their provincial driving records at baseline and were followed up for a mean of 1,684.5 days (SD = 155.7) after randomization to a 30-minute BMI or CTL session. Measured outcomes were driving arrests followed by convictions including driving while impaired (DWI), speeding, or other moving violations as well as crashes. Age, readiness to change alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse severity, and number of previous DWI convictions were included as potential moderators of the effect of the interventions. RESULTS: For arrests, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed no significant differences between the BMI and the CTL group. When analyses were adjusted to age tertile categories, a significant effect of BMI in the youngest age tertile (<43 years old) emerged. For crashes, no between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was better at delaying DWI and other dangerous traffic violations in at-risk younger drivers compared with a CTL similar to that provided in many remedial programs. BMI may be useful as an opportunistic intervention for DWI recidivism prevention in settings such as DWI courts. Treatment effectiveness studies are needed to ascertain how the present findings generalize to the real-world conditions of mandated relicensing programs. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013-11 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4352330/ /pubmed/23895363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Research Society on Alcoholism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Behavior, Treatment and Prevention Ouimet, Marie Claude Dongier, Maurice Di Leo, Ivana Legault, Lucie Tremblay, Jacques Chanut, Florence Brown, Thomas G A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title_full | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title_short | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Motivational Interviewing in Impaired Driving Recidivists: A 5-Year Follow-Up of Traffic Offenses and Crashes |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: a 5-year follow-up of traffic offenses and crashes |
topic | Behavior, Treatment and Prevention |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4352330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23895363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.12180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouimetmarieclaude arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT dongiermaurice arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT dileoivana arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT legaultlucie arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT tremblayjacques arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT chanutflorence arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT brownthomasg arandomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT ouimetmarieclaude randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT dongiermaurice randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT dileoivana randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT legaultlucie randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT tremblayjacques randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT chanutflorence randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes AT brownthomasg randomizedcontrolledtrialofbriefmotivationalinterviewinginimpaireddrivingrecidivistsa5yearfollowupoftrafficoffensesandcrashes |