Cargando…

A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology

Two sections of an introductory microbiology course were taught by one instructor. One was taught through a hybrid format and the other through a traditional format. Students were randomly assigned to the two sections. Both sections were provided with identical lecture materials, in-class worksheets...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Alison E. M., Randall, Shelby, Traustadóttir, Tinna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
_version_ 1782360550395609088
author Adams, Alison E. M.
Randall, Shelby
Traustadóttir, Tinna
author_facet Adams, Alison E. M.
Randall, Shelby
Traustadóttir, Tinna
author_sort Adams, Alison E. M.
collection PubMed
description Two sections of an introductory microbiology course were taught by one instructor. One was taught through a hybrid format and the other through a traditional format. Students were randomly assigned to the two sections. Both sections were provided with identical lecture materials, in-class worksheets, in-class assessments, and extra credit opportunities; the main difference was in the way the lecture material was delivered—online for the hybrid section and in person for the traditional section. Analysis of final grades revealed that students in the traditional section did significantly better than those in the hybrid section (p < 0.001). There was a significant main effect of class standing (p < 0.01). When performance in the two sections was compared for each class year separately, the differences were only significant for sophomores (p < 0.001); freshmen, juniors, and seniors did not perform differently in the hybrid versus the traditional section. An anonymous midterm survey suggested factors likely contributing to the overall lower success of students in the hybrid section: some students in the hybrid section did not take lecture notes and/or use the audio component of the online lectures, suggesting minimal interaction with the lecture material for these students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43530812015-04-07 A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology Adams, Alison E. M. Randall, Shelby Traustadóttir, Tinna CBE Life Sci Educ Articles Two sections of an introductory microbiology course were taught by one instructor. One was taught through a hybrid format and the other through a traditional format. Students were randomly assigned to the two sections. Both sections were provided with identical lecture materials, in-class worksheets, in-class assessments, and extra credit opportunities; the main difference was in the way the lecture material was delivered—online for the hybrid section and in person for the traditional section. Analysis of final grades revealed that students in the traditional section did significantly better than those in the hybrid section (p < 0.001). There was a significant main effect of class standing (p < 0.01). When performance in the two sections was compared for each class year separately, the differences were only significant for sophomores (p < 0.001); freshmen, juniors, and seniors did not perform differently in the hybrid versus the traditional section. An anonymous midterm survey suggested factors likely contributing to the overall lower success of students in the hybrid section: some students in the hybrid section did not take lecture notes and/or use the audio component of the online lectures, suggesting minimal interaction with the lecture material for these students. American Society for Cell Biology 2015-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4353081/ /pubmed/25713096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118 Text en © 2015 A. E. M. Adams et al.CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2015 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Articles
Adams, Alison E. M.
Randall, Shelby
Traustadóttir, Tinna
A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title_full A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title_fullStr A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title_full_unstemmed A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title_short A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology
title_sort tale of two sections: an experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsalisonem ataleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology
AT randallshelby ataleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology
AT traustadottirtinna ataleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology
AT adamsalisonem taleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology
AT randallshelby taleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology
AT traustadottirtinna taleoftwosectionsanexperimenttocomparetheeffectivenessofahybridversusatraditionallectureformatinintroductorymicrobiology