Cargando…

Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative patient evaluation is an integral component of perioperative care. An audit of our anesthesia department's records demonstrated a compliance rate of <50%. We postulated that the development of clinical anesthesia service dedicated to performing such evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vacanti, Joshua Charles, Urman, Richard Dennis, Sarin, Pankaj, Liu, Xiaoxia, Kodali, Bhavani Shankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788778
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.150550
_version_ 1782360567473766400
author Vacanti, Joshua Charles
Urman, Richard Dennis
Sarin, Pankaj
Liu, Xiaoxia
Kodali, Bhavani Shankar
author_facet Vacanti, Joshua Charles
Urman, Richard Dennis
Sarin, Pankaj
Liu, Xiaoxia
Kodali, Bhavani Shankar
author_sort Vacanti, Joshua Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative patient evaluation is an integral component of perioperative care. An audit of our anesthesia department's records demonstrated a compliance rate of <50%. We postulated that the development of clinical anesthesia service dedicated to performing such evaluations would improve compliance significantly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examined postoperative follow-up completion rate at a large academic center. Data were collected from 58,000 anesthetics during three periods, between each of which an intervention was introduced. The first period examined completion rate when postoperative evaluations were left to the team performing the anesthetic. During the second period, this task was delegated to groups of anesthesiologists based on surgical subspecialty; these smaller groups utilized rotating residents. The third period examined completion rate after implementation of a postoperative evaluation service. All periods utilized the department's electronics database to identify operative patients. The number of adverse anesthesia events reported was also recorded. RESULTS: A significant difference in the proportions of compliance with postoperative evaluations among all three periods was detected. Compliance was 47% during period one and improved to 66% during period two. During period three, which employed a postoperative evaluation service, compliance was 83%. The number of adverse events reported per month increased significantly following the first study period from 95 reported monthly events to 215 and 201 in the second and third periods, respectively. CONCLUSION: By creating a dedicated postoperative evaluation service using available technology, we improved postoperative evaluation completion rate from 47% to 83%, and demonstrated a significant increase in the number of adverse events reported. Based on this, we support the deployment of a dedicated service as a quality improvement initiative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43531592015-03-18 Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits Vacanti, Joshua Charles Urman, Richard Dennis Sarin, Pankaj Liu, Xiaoxia Kodali, Bhavani Shankar J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative patient evaluation is an integral component of perioperative care. An audit of our anesthesia department's records demonstrated a compliance rate of <50%. We postulated that the development of clinical anesthesia service dedicated to performing such evaluations would improve compliance significantly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examined postoperative follow-up completion rate at a large academic center. Data were collected from 58,000 anesthetics during three periods, between each of which an intervention was introduced. The first period examined completion rate when postoperative evaluations were left to the team performing the anesthetic. During the second period, this task was delegated to groups of anesthesiologists based on surgical subspecialty; these smaller groups utilized rotating residents. The third period examined completion rate after implementation of a postoperative evaluation service. All periods utilized the department's electronics database to identify operative patients. The number of adverse anesthesia events reported was also recorded. RESULTS: A significant difference in the proportions of compliance with postoperative evaluations among all three periods was detected. Compliance was 47% during period one and improved to 66% during period two. During period three, which employed a postoperative evaluation service, compliance was 83%. The number of adverse events reported per month increased significantly following the first study period from 95 reported monthly events to 215 and 201 in the second and third periods, respectively. CONCLUSION: By creating a dedicated postoperative evaluation service using available technology, we improved postoperative evaluation completion rate from 47% to 83%, and demonstrated a significant increase in the number of adverse events reported. Based on this, we support the deployment of a dedicated service as a quality improvement initiative. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4353159/ /pubmed/25788778 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.150550 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vacanti, Joshua Charles
Urman, Richard Dennis
Sarin, Pankaj
Liu, Xiaoxia
Kodali, Bhavani Shankar
Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title_full Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title_fullStr Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title_full_unstemmed Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title_short Development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
title_sort development and implementation of a dedicated postoperative evaluation service to improve compliance of postoperative visits
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788778
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.150550
work_keys_str_mv AT vacantijoshuacharles developmentandimplementationofadedicatedpostoperativeevaluationservicetoimprovecomplianceofpostoperativevisits
AT urmanricharddennis developmentandimplementationofadedicatedpostoperativeevaluationservicetoimprovecomplianceofpostoperativevisits
AT sarinpankaj developmentandimplementationofadedicatedpostoperativeevaluationservicetoimprovecomplianceofpostoperativevisits
AT liuxiaoxia developmentandimplementationofadedicatedpostoperativeevaluationservicetoimprovecomplianceofpostoperativevisits
AT kodalibhavanishankar developmentandimplementationofadedicatedpostoperativeevaluationservicetoimprovecomplianceofpostoperativevisits