Cargando…
Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Igitur publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759607 |
_version_ | 1782360576833355776 |
---|---|
author | Valentijn, Pim P. Boesveld, Inge C. van der Klauw, Denise M. Ruwaard, Dirk Struijs, Jeroen N. Molema, Johanna J.W. Bruijnzeels, Marc A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM. |
author_facet | Valentijn, Pim P. Boesveld, Inge C. van der Klauw, Denise M. Ruwaard, Dirk Struijs, Jeroen N. Molema, Johanna J.W. Bruijnzeels, Marc A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM. |
author_sort | Valentijn, Pim P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. METHODS: First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4353214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Igitur publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43532142015-03-10 Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study Valentijn, Pim P. Boesveld, Inge C. van der Klauw, Denise M. Ruwaard, Dirk Struijs, Jeroen N. Molema, Johanna J.W. Bruijnzeels, Marc A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM. Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. METHODS: First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective. Igitur publishing 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4353214/ /pubmed/25759607 Text en Copyright 2015, Authors retain the copyright of their article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Valentijn, Pim P. Boesveld, Inge C. van der Klauw, Denise M. Ruwaard, Dirk Struijs, Jeroen N. Molema, Johanna J.W. Bruijnzeels, Marc A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM. Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title | Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valentijnpimp towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT boesveldingec towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT vanderklauwdenisem towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT ruwaarddirk towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT struijsjeroenn towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT molemajohannajw towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT bruijnzeelsmarca towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy AT vrijhoefhubertusjm towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy |