Cargando…

Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valentijn, Pim P., Boesveld, Inge C., van der Klauw, Denise M., Ruwaard, Dirk, Struijs, Jeroen N., Molema, Johanna J.W., Bruijnzeels, Marc A., Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Igitur publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759607
_version_ 1782360576833355776
author Valentijn, Pim P.
Boesveld, Inge C.
van der Klauw, Denise M.
Ruwaard, Dirk
Struijs, Jeroen N.
Molema, Johanna J.W.
Bruijnzeels, Marc A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM.
author_facet Valentijn, Pim P.
Boesveld, Inge C.
van der Klauw, Denise M.
Ruwaard, Dirk
Struijs, Jeroen N.
Molema, Johanna J.W.
Bruijnzeels, Marc A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM.
author_sort Valentijn, Pim P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. METHODS: First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Igitur publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43532142015-03-10 Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study Valentijn, Pim P. Boesveld, Inge C. van der Klauw, Denise M. Ruwaard, Dirk Struijs, Jeroen N. Molema, Johanna J.W. Bruijnzeels, Marc A. Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM. Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. METHODS: First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. RESULTS: The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective. Igitur publishing 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4353214/ /pubmed/25759607 Text en Copyright 2015, Authors retain the copyright of their article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Valentijn, Pim P.
Boesveld, Inge C.
van der Klauw, Denise M.
Ruwaard, Dirk
Struijs, Jeroen N.
Molema, Johanna J.W.
Bruijnzeels, Marc A.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus JM.
Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title_full Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title_short Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
title_sort towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759607
work_keys_str_mv AT valentijnpimp towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT boesveldingec towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanderklauwdenisem towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT ruwaarddirk towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT struijsjeroenn towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT molemajohannajw towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT bruijnzeelsmarca towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT vrijhoefhubertusjm towardsataxonomyforintegratedcareamixedmethodsstudy