Cargando…

Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Objective To examine the association of hospital volume (a marker of quality of care) with hospital readmission rates. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting 4651US acute care hospitals. Study data 6 916 644 adult discharges, excluding patients receiving psychiatric or medical cancer tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horwitz, Leora I, Lin, Zhenqiu, Herrin, Jeph, Bernheim, Susannah, Drye, Elizabeth E, Krumholz, Harlan M, Ross, Joseph S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25665806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h447
_version_ 1782360588577406976
author Horwitz, Leora I
Lin, Zhenqiu
Herrin, Jeph
Bernheim, Susannah
Drye, Elizabeth E
Krumholz, Harlan M
Ross, Joseph S
author_facet Horwitz, Leora I
Lin, Zhenqiu
Herrin, Jeph
Bernheim, Susannah
Drye, Elizabeth E
Krumholz, Harlan M
Ross, Joseph S
author_sort Horwitz, Leora I
collection PubMed
description Objective To examine the association of hospital volume (a marker of quality of care) with hospital readmission rates. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting 4651US acute care hospitals. Study data 6 916 644 adult discharges, excluding patients receiving psychiatric or medical cancer treatment. Main outcome measures We used Medicare fee-for-service data from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 to calculate observed-to-expected, unplanned, 30 day, standardized readmission rates for hospitals and for specialty cohorts medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology. We assessed the association of hospital volume by quintiles with 30 day, standardized readmission rates, with and without adjustment for hospital characteristics (safety net status, teaching status, geographic region, urban/rural status, nurse to bed ratio, ownership, and cardiac procedure capability. We also examined associations with the composite outcome of 30 day, standardized readmission or mortality rates. Results Mean 30 day, standardized readmission rate among the fifth of hospitals with the lowest volume was 14.7 (standard deviation 5.3) compared with 15.9 (1.7) among the fifth of hospitals with the highest volume (P<0.001). We observed the same pattern of lower readmission rates in the lowest versus highest volume hospitals in the specialty cohorts for medicine (16.6 v 17.4, P<0.001), cardiorespiratory (18.5 v 20.5, P<0.001), and neurology (13.2 v 14.0, p=0.01) cohorts; the cardiovascular cohort, however, had an inverse association (14.6 v 13.7, P<0.001). These associations remained after adjustment for hospital characteristics except in the cardiovascular cohort, which became non-significant, and the surgery/gynecology cohort, in which the lowest volume fifth of hospitals had significantly higher standardized readmission rates than the highest volume fifth (difference 0.63 percentage points (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 1.17), P=0.02). Mean 30 day, standardized mortality or readmission rate was not significantly different between highest and lowest volume fifths (20.4 v 20.2, P=0.19) and was highest in the middle fifth of hospitals (range 20.6–20.8). Conclusions Standardized readmission rates are lowest in the lowest volume hospitals—opposite from the typical association of greater hospital volume with better outcomes. This association was independent of hospital characteristics and was only partially attenuated by examining mortality and readmission together. Our findings suggest that readmissions are associated with different aspects of care than mortality or complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43532862015-03-18 Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study Horwitz, Leora I Lin, Zhenqiu Herrin, Jeph Bernheim, Susannah Drye, Elizabeth E Krumholz, Harlan M Ross, Joseph S BMJ Research Objective To examine the association of hospital volume (a marker of quality of care) with hospital readmission rates. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting 4651US acute care hospitals. Study data 6 916 644 adult discharges, excluding patients receiving psychiatric or medical cancer treatment. Main outcome measures We used Medicare fee-for-service data from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 to calculate observed-to-expected, unplanned, 30 day, standardized readmission rates for hospitals and for specialty cohorts medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology. We assessed the association of hospital volume by quintiles with 30 day, standardized readmission rates, with and without adjustment for hospital characteristics (safety net status, teaching status, geographic region, urban/rural status, nurse to bed ratio, ownership, and cardiac procedure capability. We also examined associations with the composite outcome of 30 day, standardized readmission or mortality rates. Results Mean 30 day, standardized readmission rate among the fifth of hospitals with the lowest volume was 14.7 (standard deviation 5.3) compared with 15.9 (1.7) among the fifth of hospitals with the highest volume (P<0.001). We observed the same pattern of lower readmission rates in the lowest versus highest volume hospitals in the specialty cohorts for medicine (16.6 v 17.4, P<0.001), cardiorespiratory (18.5 v 20.5, P<0.001), and neurology (13.2 v 14.0, p=0.01) cohorts; the cardiovascular cohort, however, had an inverse association (14.6 v 13.7, P<0.001). These associations remained after adjustment for hospital characteristics except in the cardiovascular cohort, which became non-significant, and the surgery/gynecology cohort, in which the lowest volume fifth of hospitals had significantly higher standardized readmission rates than the highest volume fifth (difference 0.63 percentage points (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 1.17), P=0.02). Mean 30 day, standardized mortality or readmission rate was not significantly different between highest and lowest volume fifths (20.4 v 20.2, P=0.19) and was highest in the middle fifth of hospitals (range 20.6–20.8). Conclusions Standardized readmission rates are lowest in the lowest volume hospitals—opposite from the typical association of greater hospital volume with better outcomes. This association was independent of hospital characteristics and was only partially attenuated by examining mortality and readmission together. Our findings suggest that readmissions are associated with different aspects of care than mortality or complications. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4353286/ /pubmed/25665806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h447 Text en © Horwitz et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Horwitz, Leora I
Lin, Zhenqiu
Herrin, Jeph
Bernheim, Susannah
Drye, Elizabeth E
Krumholz, Harlan M
Ross, Joseph S
Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_short Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
title_sort association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25665806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h447
work_keys_str_mv AT horwitzleorai associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT linzhenqiu associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT herrinjeph associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT bernheimsusannah associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT dryeelizabethe associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT krumholzharlanm associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT rossjosephs associationofhospitalvolumewithreadmissionratesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy