Cargando…

Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins used for labour induction. Design Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis Data sources The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Database of Trials (which incorporates the results of a broad generic search for all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfirevic, Zarko, Keeney, Edna, Dowswell, Therese, Welton, Nicky J, Dias, Sofia, Jones, Leanne V, Navaratnam, Kate, Caldwell, Deborah M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h217
_version_ 1782360588832210944
author Alfirevic, Zarko
Keeney, Edna
Dowswell, Therese
Welton, Nicky J
Dias, Sofia
Jones, Leanne V
Navaratnam, Kate
Caldwell, Deborah M
author_facet Alfirevic, Zarko
Keeney, Edna
Dowswell, Therese
Welton, Nicky J
Dias, Sofia
Jones, Leanne V
Navaratnam, Kate
Caldwell, Deborah M
author_sort Alfirevic, Zarko
collection PubMed
description Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins used for labour induction. Design Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis Data sources The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Database of Trials (which incorporates the results of a broad generic search for all pregnancy and postpartum trials). Sources included are CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CINAHL, relevant journals, conference proceedings, and registries of ongoing trials. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised clinical trials of prostaglandin or prostaglandin analogues used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction versus placebo or no treatment, alternative prostaglandin dose or administration, or a different type of prostaglandin. We included studies recruiting women with a viable fetus, but had no other restrictions relating to indication for labour induction or language of publication. Outcomes assessed were serious neonatal morbidity (trialist defined) or perinatal death; serious maternal morbidity (trialist defined) or death; vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours, caesarean section, and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes. Results 280 randomised clinical trials were included (48 068 women) in the review. Maternal and neonatal mortality and serious morbidity were rarely reported and are summarized narratively. Unresolved inconsistency was observed for the hyperstimulation outcome. Relative to placebo, the odds of failing to achieve a vaginal delivery were lowest for vaginal misoprostol (≥50 µg) (odds ratio 0.06 (95% credible interval 0.02 to 0.12)), with a 39% absolute probability of event (95% credible interval 1% to 94%). Compared with placebo, odds of caesarean section were lowest for titrated oral misoprostol solution (<50 µg) (odds ratio 0.65 (0.49 to 0.83)), with an absolute probability of event of 15% (3% to 40%). Conclusions Low dose(<50 µg) titrated oral misoprostol solution had the lowest probability of caesarean section, whereas vaginal misprostol (≥50 µg) had the highest probability of achieving a vaginal delivery within 24 hours. These findings have important implications for a series of current national and international guidelines for induction of labour and future research in this area. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013005116
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43532872015-03-18 Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Alfirevic, Zarko Keeney, Edna Dowswell, Therese Welton, Nicky J Dias, Sofia Jones, Leanne V Navaratnam, Kate Caldwell, Deborah M BMJ Research Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins used for labour induction. Design Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis Data sources The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Database of Trials (which incorporates the results of a broad generic search for all pregnancy and postpartum trials). Sources included are CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CINAHL, relevant journals, conference proceedings, and registries of ongoing trials. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised clinical trials of prostaglandin or prostaglandin analogues used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction versus placebo or no treatment, alternative prostaglandin dose or administration, or a different type of prostaglandin. We included studies recruiting women with a viable fetus, but had no other restrictions relating to indication for labour induction or language of publication. Outcomes assessed were serious neonatal morbidity (trialist defined) or perinatal death; serious maternal morbidity (trialist defined) or death; vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours, caesarean section, and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes. Results 280 randomised clinical trials were included (48 068 women) in the review. Maternal and neonatal mortality and serious morbidity were rarely reported and are summarized narratively. Unresolved inconsistency was observed for the hyperstimulation outcome. Relative to placebo, the odds of failing to achieve a vaginal delivery were lowest for vaginal misoprostol (≥50 µg) (odds ratio 0.06 (95% credible interval 0.02 to 0.12)), with a 39% absolute probability of event (95% credible interval 1% to 94%). Compared with placebo, odds of caesarean section were lowest for titrated oral misoprostol solution (<50 µg) (odds ratio 0.65 (0.49 to 0.83)), with an absolute probability of event of 15% (3% to 40%). Conclusions Low dose(<50 µg) titrated oral misoprostol solution had the lowest probability of caesarean section, whereas vaginal misprostol (≥50 µg) had the highest probability of achieving a vaginal delivery within 24 hours. These findings have important implications for a series of current national and international guidelines for induction of labour and future research in this area. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013005116 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4353287/ /pubmed/25656228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h217 Text en © Alfirevic et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Alfirevic, Zarko
Keeney, Edna
Dowswell, Therese
Welton, Nicky J
Dias, Sofia
Jones, Leanne V
Navaratnam, Kate
Caldwell, Deborah M
Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h217
work_keys_str_mv AT alfireviczarko labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT keeneyedna labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT dowswelltherese labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weltonnickyj labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT diassofia labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jonesleannev labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT navaratnamkate labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT caldwelldeborahm labourinductionwithprostaglandinsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis