Cargando…

Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the local control of brain metastases (BM) in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), correlate the outcome with treatment parameters and lesion characteristics, and define its implications for clinical decisions. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 305 BM in 141 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro, Tundisi, Carmen Freire, Ramos, Henderson, Maia, Maria Aparecida Conte, Pellizzon, Antônio Cássio Assis, Silva, Maria Letícia Gobo, Fogaroli, Ricardo César, Chen, Michael Jenwei, Suzuki, Sérgio Hideki, Dias Jr, José Eduardo Souza, Sanematsu Jr, Paulo Issamu, de Castro, Douglas Guedes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0367-y
_version_ 1782360610428682240
author de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro
Tundisi, Carmen Freire
Ramos, Henderson
Maia, Maria Aparecida Conte
Pellizzon, Antônio Cássio Assis
Silva, Maria Letícia Gobo
Fogaroli, Ricardo César
Chen, Michael Jenwei
Suzuki, Sérgio Hideki
Dias Jr, José Eduardo Souza
Sanematsu Jr, Paulo Issamu
de Castro, Douglas Guedes
author_facet de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro
Tundisi, Carmen Freire
Ramos, Henderson
Maia, Maria Aparecida Conte
Pellizzon, Antônio Cássio Assis
Silva, Maria Letícia Gobo
Fogaroli, Ricardo César
Chen, Michael Jenwei
Suzuki, Sérgio Hideki
Dias Jr, José Eduardo Souza
Sanematsu Jr, Paulo Issamu
de Castro, Douglas Guedes
author_sort de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the local control of brain metastases (BM) in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), correlate the outcome with treatment parameters and lesion characteristics, and define its implications for clinical decisions. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 305 BM in 141 consecutive patients were treated with SRS. After exclusions, 216 BM in 100 patients were analyzed. Doses were grouped as follows: ≤15 Gy, 16–20 Gy, and ≥21 Gy. Sizes were classified as ≤10 mm and >10 mm. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank statistics were used to identify the prognostic factors affecting LC and OS. For multivariate analyses, a Cox proportional model was applied including all potentially significant variables reached on univariate analyses. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (18–80). Median radiological follow-up of the lesions was 7 months (1–66). Median LC and the LC at 1 year were 22.3 months and 69.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, tumor size, SRS dose, and previous whole brain irradiation (WBRT) were significant factors for LC. Patients with lesions >10 and ≤10 mm had an LC at 1 year of 58.6% and 79.1%, respectively (p = 0.008). In lesions receiving ≤15 Gy, 16–20 Gy, and ≥21 Gy, the 1-year LC rates were 39.6%, 71.7%, and 92.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). When WBRT was done previously, LC at 1 year was 57.9% compared with 78.4% for those who did not undergo WBRT (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, dose remained the single most powerful prognostic factor for LC. Median OS for all patients was 17 months, with no difference among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose is the most important predictive factor for LC of BM. Doses below 16 Gy correlated with poor LC. The SRS dose as salvage treatment after previous WBRT should not be reduced unless there is a pressing reason to do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43534572015-03-10 Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro Tundisi, Carmen Freire Ramos, Henderson Maia, Maria Aparecida Conte Pellizzon, Antônio Cássio Assis Silva, Maria Letícia Gobo Fogaroli, Ricardo César Chen, Michael Jenwei Suzuki, Sérgio Hideki Dias Jr, José Eduardo Souza Sanematsu Jr, Paulo Issamu de Castro, Douglas Guedes Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the local control of brain metastases (BM) in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), correlate the outcome with treatment parameters and lesion characteristics, and define its implications for clinical decisions. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 305 BM in 141 consecutive patients were treated with SRS. After exclusions, 216 BM in 100 patients were analyzed. Doses were grouped as follows: ≤15 Gy, 16–20 Gy, and ≥21 Gy. Sizes were classified as ≤10 mm and >10 mm. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank statistics were used to identify the prognostic factors affecting LC and OS. For multivariate analyses, a Cox proportional model was applied including all potentially significant variables reached on univariate analyses. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (18–80). Median radiological follow-up of the lesions was 7 months (1–66). Median LC and the LC at 1 year were 22.3 months and 69.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, tumor size, SRS dose, and previous whole brain irradiation (WBRT) were significant factors for LC. Patients with lesions >10 and ≤10 mm had an LC at 1 year of 58.6% and 79.1%, respectively (p = 0.008). In lesions receiving ≤15 Gy, 16–20 Gy, and ≥21 Gy, the 1-year LC rates were 39.6%, 71.7%, and 92.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). When WBRT was done previously, LC at 1 year was 57.9% compared with 78.4% for those who did not undergo WBRT (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, dose remained the single most powerful prognostic factor for LC. Median OS for all patients was 17 months, with no difference among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dose is the most important predictive factor for LC of BM. Doses below 16 Gy correlated with poor LC. The SRS dose as salvage treatment after previous WBRT should not be reduced unless there is a pressing reason to do so. BioMed Central 2015-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4353457/ /pubmed/25884621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0367-y Text en © Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
de Azevedo Santos, Tâmara Ribeiro
Tundisi, Carmen Freire
Ramos, Henderson
Maia, Maria Aparecida Conte
Pellizzon, Antônio Cássio Assis
Silva, Maria Letícia Gobo
Fogaroli, Ricardo César
Chen, Michael Jenwei
Suzuki, Sérgio Hideki
Dias Jr, José Eduardo Souza
Sanematsu Jr, Paulo Issamu
de Castro, Douglas Guedes
Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title_full Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title_fullStr Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title_full_unstemmed Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title_short Local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
title_sort local control after radiosurgery for brain metastases: predictive factors and implications for clinical decision
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0367-y
work_keys_str_mv AT deazevedosantostamararibeiro localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT tundisicarmenfreire localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT ramoshenderson localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT maiamariaaparecidaconte localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT pellizzonantoniocassioassis localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT silvamarialeticiagobo localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT fogaroliricardocesar localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT chenmichaeljenwei localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT suzukisergiohideki localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT diasjrjoseeduardosouza localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT sanematsujrpauloissamu localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision
AT decastrodouglasguedes localcontrolafterradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasespredictivefactorsandimplicationsforclinicaldecision