Cargando…
Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism
The biological activities of propolis are varied from plant sources and the prominent antioxidant effects of Chinese propolis (poplar type) have been extensively reported. Oxidative stress is associated with inflammation and induces many diseases. In the study, to evaluate antioxidant capacities and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/307594 |
_version_ | 1782360620843139072 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jianglin Cao, Xueping Ping, Shun Wang, Kai Shi, Jinhu Zhang, Cuiping Zheng, Huoqing Hu, Fuliang |
author_facet | Zhang, Jianglin Cao, Xueping Ping, Shun Wang, Kai Shi, Jinhu Zhang, Cuiping Zheng, Huoqing Hu, Fuliang |
author_sort | Zhang, Jianglin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The biological activities of propolis are varied from plant sources and the prominent antioxidant effects of Chinese propolis (poplar type) have been extensively reported. Oxidative stress is associated with inflammation and induces many diseases. In the study, to evaluate antioxidant capacities and clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms of ethanol extracts of Chinese propolis (EECP) and ethanol extracts of poplar gums (EEPG), we analyzed their compositions by HPLC, evaluating their free radical scavenging activities and reducing power by chemical analysis methods. Moreover, we studied the roles of EECP and EEPG on the elimination of ROS and expressions of antioxidant genes (HO-1, TrxR1, GCLM, and GCLC) in RAW264.7 cells. We further investigated the effects of MAPKs on the antioxidant genes expression by specific inhibitors. The nucleus translocation effects of Nrf2 were also measured by confocal microscopy analysis. The results indicated that EECP had higher TPC and FDC values but regarding TFC values were not significant. EECP also possessed more contents of 11 compounds than EEPG. Both phytochemical analysis and cell experiment reflected that EECP exerted stronger antioxidant activities than EEPG. EECP and EEPG enhanced endogenous antioxidant defenses by eliminating reactive oxygen species directly and activating Erk-Nrf2-HO1, GCLM, and TrxR1 signal pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4353659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43536592015-03-23 Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism Zhang, Jianglin Cao, Xueping Ping, Shun Wang, Kai Shi, Jinhu Zhang, Cuiping Zheng, Huoqing Hu, Fuliang Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article The biological activities of propolis are varied from plant sources and the prominent antioxidant effects of Chinese propolis (poplar type) have been extensively reported. Oxidative stress is associated with inflammation and induces many diseases. In the study, to evaluate antioxidant capacities and clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms of ethanol extracts of Chinese propolis (EECP) and ethanol extracts of poplar gums (EEPG), we analyzed their compositions by HPLC, evaluating their free radical scavenging activities and reducing power by chemical analysis methods. Moreover, we studied the roles of EECP and EEPG on the elimination of ROS and expressions of antioxidant genes (HO-1, TrxR1, GCLM, and GCLC) in RAW264.7 cells. We further investigated the effects of MAPKs on the antioxidant genes expression by specific inhibitors. The nucleus translocation effects of Nrf2 were also measured by confocal microscopy analysis. The results indicated that EECP had higher TPC and FDC values but regarding TFC values were not significant. EECP also possessed more contents of 11 compounds than EEPG. Both phytochemical analysis and cell experiment reflected that EECP exerted stronger antioxidant activities than EEPG. EECP and EEPG enhanced endogenous antioxidant defenses by eliminating reactive oxygen species directly and activating Erk-Nrf2-HO1, GCLM, and TrxR1 signal pathways. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4353659/ /pubmed/25802536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/307594 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jianglin Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Jianglin Cao, Xueping Ping, Shun Wang, Kai Shi, Jinhu Zhang, Cuiping Zheng, Huoqing Hu, Fuliang Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title | Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title_full | Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title_short | Comparisons of Ethanol Extracts of Chinese Propolis (Poplar Type) and Poplar Gums Based on the Antioxidant Activities and Molecular Mechanism |
title_sort | comparisons of ethanol extracts of chinese propolis (poplar type) and poplar gums based on the antioxidant activities and molecular mechanism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/307594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjianglin comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT caoxueping comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT pingshun comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT wangkai comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT shijinhu comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT zhangcuiping comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT zhenghuoqing comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism AT hufuliang comparisonsofethanolextractsofchinesepropolispoplartypeandpoplargumsbasedontheantioxidantactivitiesandmolecularmechanism |