Cargando…

Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation

Cricothyroid membrane injections and the application of a coarse fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) below the vocal cords for topical anesthesia have a number of limitations for certain patients. Thus, the aim of the present observational study was to assess the effect of a novel modified topical anesthe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LIU, HUI-HUI, ZHOU, TAO, WEI, JIAN-QI, MA, WU-HUA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2288
_version_ 1782360636670345216
author LIU, HUI-HUI
ZHOU, TAO
WEI, JIAN-QI
MA, WU-HUA
author_facet LIU, HUI-HUI
ZHOU, TAO
WEI, JIAN-QI
MA, WU-HUA
author_sort LIU, HUI-HUI
collection PubMed
description Cricothyroid membrane injections and the application of a coarse fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) below the vocal cords for topical anesthesia have a number of limitations for certain patients. Thus, the aim of the present observational study was to assess the effect of a novel modified topical anesthesia method using the effective sedation drugs, remifentanil (Rem) or dexmedetomidine (Dex), during awake fiberoptic orotracheal intubation (AFOI). In total, 90 adult patients, who had been classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II, were included in the study. The patients had anticipated difficult airways and were to undergo orotracheal intubation for elective surgery. The patients were enrolled in the double-blinded randomized pilot study and received Rem or Dex for sedation during the modified AFOI procedure. The two groups received 2% lidocaine for topical anesthesia via an epidural catheter, which was threaded through the suction channel of the FOB. The main clinical outcomes were evaluated by graded scores representing the conditions for intubation and post-intubation. Additional parameters analyzed included airway obstruction, hemodynamic changes, time required for intubation, amnesia level and subjective satisfaction. All 90 patients were successfully intubated using the modified AFOI technique. The comfort scores and airway events during intubation did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, the Rem group experienced less coughing, and less time was required for tracheal intubation when compared with the Dex group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the changes to the mean arterial pressure and heart rate at any time point between the two groups. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that the modified AFOI method is feasible and effective for difficult airway management, and that Dex and Rem exhibit similar efficacy as adjuvant therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43537352015-03-16 Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation LIU, HUI-HUI ZHOU, TAO WEI, JIAN-QI MA, WU-HUA Exp Ther Med Articles Cricothyroid membrane injections and the application of a coarse fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) below the vocal cords for topical anesthesia have a number of limitations for certain patients. Thus, the aim of the present observational study was to assess the effect of a novel modified topical anesthesia method using the effective sedation drugs, remifentanil (Rem) or dexmedetomidine (Dex), during awake fiberoptic orotracheal intubation (AFOI). In total, 90 adult patients, who had been classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II, were included in the study. The patients had anticipated difficult airways and were to undergo orotracheal intubation for elective surgery. The patients were enrolled in the double-blinded randomized pilot study and received Rem or Dex for sedation during the modified AFOI procedure. The two groups received 2% lidocaine for topical anesthesia via an epidural catheter, which was threaded through the suction channel of the FOB. The main clinical outcomes were evaluated by graded scores representing the conditions for intubation and post-intubation. Additional parameters analyzed included airway obstruction, hemodynamic changes, time required for intubation, amnesia level and subjective satisfaction. All 90 patients were successfully intubated using the modified AFOI technique. The comfort scores and airway events during intubation did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, the Rem group experienced less coughing, and less time was required for tracheal intubation when compared with the Dex group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the changes to the mean arterial pressure and heart rate at any time point between the two groups. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that the modified AFOI method is feasible and effective for difficult airway management, and that Dex and Rem exhibit similar efficacy as adjuvant therapies. D.A. Spandidos 2015-04 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4353735/ /pubmed/25780419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2288 Text en Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
LIU, HUI-HUI
ZHOU, TAO
WEI, JIAN-QI
MA, WU-HUA
Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title_full Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title_fullStr Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title_short Comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
title_sort comparison between remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for sedation during modified awake fiberoptic intubation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2288
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhuihui comparisonbetweenremifentanilanddexmedetomidineforsedationduringmodifiedawakefiberopticintubation
AT zhoutao comparisonbetweenremifentanilanddexmedetomidineforsedationduringmodifiedawakefiberopticintubation
AT weijianqi comparisonbetweenremifentanilanddexmedetomidineforsedationduringmodifiedawakefiberopticintubation
AT mawuhua comparisonbetweenremifentanilanddexmedetomidineforsedationduringmodifiedawakefiberopticintubation