Cargando…

Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation

Early detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, particularly EGFR T790M mutation, is of clinical significance. The aim of the present study was to compare the performances of amplification refractory mutation system-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and dr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ZHANG, BO, XU, CHUN-WEI, SHAO, YUN, WANG, HUAI-TAO, WU, YONG-FANG, SONG, YE-YING, LI, XIAO-BING, ZHANG, ZHE, WANG, WEN-JING, LI, LI-QIONG, CAI, CONG-LI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2221
_version_ 1782360640539590656
author ZHANG, BO
XU, CHUN-WEI
SHAO, YUN
WANG, HUAI-TAO
WU, YONG-FANG
SONG, YE-YING
LI, XIAO-BING
ZHANG, ZHE
WANG, WEN-JING
LI, LI-QIONG
CAI, CONG-LI
author_facet ZHANG, BO
XU, CHUN-WEI
SHAO, YUN
WANG, HUAI-TAO
WU, YONG-FANG
SONG, YE-YING
LI, XIAO-BING
ZHANG, ZHE
WANG, WEN-JING
LI, LI-QIONG
CAI, CONG-LI
author_sort ZHANG, BO
collection PubMed
description Early detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, particularly EGFR T790M mutation, is of clinical significance. The aim of the present study was to compare the performances of amplification refractory mutation system-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) approaches in the detection of EGFR mutation and explore the feasibility of using ddPCR in the detection of samples with low mutation rates. EGFR gene mutations in plasmid samples with different T790M mutation rates (0.1–5%) and 10 clinical samples were detected using the ARMS-qPCR and ddPCR approaches. The results demonstrated that the ARMS-qPCR method stably detected the plasmid samples (6,000 copies) with 5 and 1% mutation rates, while the ddPCR approach reliably detected those with 5% (398 copies), 1% (57 copies), 0.5% (24 copies) and 0.1% (average 6 copies) mutation rates. For the 10 clinical samples, the results for nine samples by the ARMS-qPCR and ddPCR methods were consistent; however, the sample N006, indicated to be EGFR wild-type by ARMS-qPCR, was revealed to have a clear EGFR T790M mutation with seven copies of mutant alleles in a background of 6,000 wild-type copies using ddPCR technology. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying the ddPCR system to detect EGFR mutation and identified the advantage of ddPCR in the detection of samples with a low EGFR mutation abundance, particularly the secondary EGFR T790M resistance mutation, which enables early diagnosis before acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors becomes clinically detectable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43537522015-03-16 Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation ZHANG, BO XU, CHUN-WEI SHAO, YUN WANG, HUAI-TAO WU, YONG-FANG SONG, YE-YING LI, XIAO-BING ZHANG, ZHE WANG, WEN-JING LI, LI-QIONG CAI, CONG-LI Exp Ther Med Articles Early detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, particularly EGFR T790M mutation, is of clinical significance. The aim of the present study was to compare the performances of amplification refractory mutation system-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) approaches in the detection of EGFR mutation and explore the feasibility of using ddPCR in the detection of samples with low mutation rates. EGFR gene mutations in plasmid samples with different T790M mutation rates (0.1–5%) and 10 clinical samples were detected using the ARMS-qPCR and ddPCR approaches. The results demonstrated that the ARMS-qPCR method stably detected the plasmid samples (6,000 copies) with 5 and 1% mutation rates, while the ddPCR approach reliably detected those with 5% (398 copies), 1% (57 copies), 0.5% (24 copies) and 0.1% (average 6 copies) mutation rates. For the 10 clinical samples, the results for nine samples by the ARMS-qPCR and ddPCR methods were consistent; however, the sample N006, indicated to be EGFR wild-type by ARMS-qPCR, was revealed to have a clear EGFR T790M mutation with seven copies of mutant alleles in a background of 6,000 wild-type copies using ddPCR technology. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying the ddPCR system to detect EGFR mutation and identified the advantage of ddPCR in the detection of samples with a low EGFR mutation abundance, particularly the secondary EGFR T790M resistance mutation, which enables early diagnosis before acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors becomes clinically detectable. D.A. Spandidos 2015-04 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4353752/ /pubmed/25780439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2221 Text en Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
ZHANG, BO
XU, CHUN-WEI
SHAO, YUN
WANG, HUAI-TAO
WU, YONG-FANG
SONG, YE-YING
LI, XIAO-BING
ZHANG, ZHE
WANG, WEN-JING
LI, LI-QIONG
CAI, CONG-LI
Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title_full Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title_fullStr Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title_short Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring EGFR gene mutation
title_sort comparison of droplet digital pcr and conventional quantitative pcr for measuring egfr gene mutation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2221
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbo comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT xuchunwei comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT shaoyun comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT wanghuaitao comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT wuyongfang comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT songyeying comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT lixiaobing comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT zhangzhe comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT wangwenjing comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT liliqiong comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation
AT caicongli comparisonofdropletdigitalpcrandconventionalquantitativepcrformeasuringegfrgenemutation