Cargando…

Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers

PURPOSE: To determine a reference background urinary thallium level; to compare urinary thallium data from workers to this background level; to investigate factors affecting these levels and whether creatinine correction is appropriate. METHODS: Urine samples from non-occupationally exposed people (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staff, James F., Cotton, Richard J., Warren, Nicholas D., Morton, Jackie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23446652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0859-8
_version_ 1782360658554126336
author Staff, James F.
Cotton, Richard J.
Warren, Nicholas D.
Morton, Jackie
author_facet Staff, James F.
Cotton, Richard J.
Warren, Nicholas D.
Morton, Jackie
author_sort Staff, James F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine a reference background urinary thallium level; to compare urinary thallium data from workers to this background level; to investigate factors affecting these levels and whether creatinine correction is appropriate. METHODS: Urine samples from non-occupationally exposed people (n = 273, from 113 individuals) and workers (n = 896, from 447 individuals) were analysed for thallium by ICP-MS. A reference background level was calculated, defined as the 95th percentile value of a non-occupationally exposed population. Worker data were divided into two subsets: thallium workers (those who work directly with thallium or its compounds) and general workers; and compared to the background level. Bayesian linear mixed effects modelling was used to investigate factors affecting urinary thallium concentration and the efficacy of creatinine correction for the determination of urinary thallium. RESULTS: The reference background urinary thallium level is 0.27 μmol/mol creatinine (creatinine-corrected) or 0.40 μg/l (uncorrected). Median values were 0.11 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.17 μg/l for non-occupationally exposed people, 0.12 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.20 μg/l for general workers and 0.19 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.41 μg/l for thallium workers. Variation was lower in creatinine-corrected models. Nine per cent of samples from general workers and 39 % of samples from thallium workers exceeded the creatinine-corrected background level. By 2010, 90 % of all workers had urinary thallium levels below the 95th percentile reference background level. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary thallium concentrations were higher in thallium workers than non-occupationally exposed people and general workers. Creatinine correction is appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43538582015-03-13 Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers Staff, James F. Cotton, Richard J. Warren, Nicholas D. Morton, Jackie Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: To determine a reference background urinary thallium level; to compare urinary thallium data from workers to this background level; to investigate factors affecting these levels and whether creatinine correction is appropriate. METHODS: Urine samples from non-occupationally exposed people (n = 273, from 113 individuals) and workers (n = 896, from 447 individuals) were analysed for thallium by ICP-MS. A reference background level was calculated, defined as the 95th percentile value of a non-occupationally exposed population. Worker data were divided into two subsets: thallium workers (those who work directly with thallium or its compounds) and general workers; and compared to the background level. Bayesian linear mixed effects modelling was used to investigate factors affecting urinary thallium concentration and the efficacy of creatinine correction for the determination of urinary thallium. RESULTS: The reference background urinary thallium level is 0.27 μmol/mol creatinine (creatinine-corrected) or 0.40 μg/l (uncorrected). Median values were 0.11 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.17 μg/l for non-occupationally exposed people, 0.12 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.20 μg/l for general workers and 0.19 μmol/mol creatinine or 0.41 μg/l for thallium workers. Variation was lower in creatinine-corrected models. Nine per cent of samples from general workers and 39 % of samples from thallium workers exceeded the creatinine-corrected background level. By 2010, 90 % of all workers had urinary thallium levels below the 95th percentile reference background level. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary thallium concentrations were higher in thallium workers than non-occupationally exposed people and general workers. Creatinine correction is appropriate. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-02-28 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4353858/ /pubmed/23446652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0859-8 Text en © Crown Copyright 2013
spellingShingle Original Article
Staff, James F.
Cotton, Richard J.
Warren, Nicholas D.
Morton, Jackie
Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title_full Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title_fullStr Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title_short Comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
title_sort comparison of urinary thallium levels in non-occupationally exposed people and workers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23446652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0859-8
work_keys_str_mv AT staffjamesf comparisonofurinarythalliumlevelsinnonoccupationallyexposedpeopleandworkers
AT cottonrichardj comparisonofurinarythalliumlevelsinnonoccupationallyexposedpeopleandworkers
AT warrennicholasd comparisonofurinarythalliumlevelsinnonoccupationallyexposedpeopleandworkers
AT mortonjackie comparisonofurinarythalliumlevelsinnonoccupationallyexposedpeopleandworkers