Cargando…
Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation
Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25001500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6 |
_version_ | 1782360659914129408 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin Neelon, S. E. Duncan, D. T. Burgoine, T. Mayhew, M. Platt, A. |
author_facet | Benjamin Neelon, S. E. Duncan, D. T. Burgoine, T. Mayhew, M. Platt, A. |
author_sort | Benjamin Neelon, S. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4353864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43538642015-03-13 Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation Benjamin Neelon, S. E. Duncan, D. T. Burgoine, T. Mayhew, M. Platt, A. Matern Child Health J Article Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US. Springer US 2014-07-08 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4353864/ /pubmed/25001500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Benjamin Neelon, S. E. Duncan, D. T. Burgoine, T. Mayhew, M. Platt, A. Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title | Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title_full | Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title_fullStr | Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title_short | Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation |
title_sort | promoting breastfeeding in child care through state regulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25001500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminneelonse promotingbreastfeedinginchildcarethroughstateregulation AT duncandt promotingbreastfeedinginchildcarethroughstateregulation AT burgoinet promotingbreastfeedinginchildcarethroughstateregulation AT mayhewm promotingbreastfeedinginchildcarethroughstateregulation AT platta promotingbreastfeedinginchildcarethroughstateregulation |