Cargando…
The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z |
_version_ | 1782360663989944320 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Samuel G. Raine, Rosalind Obichere, Austin Wolf, Michael S. Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian |
author_facet | Smith, Samuel G. Raine, Rosalind Obichere, Austin Wolf, Michael S. Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian |
author_sort | Smith, Samuel G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information (‘The Facts’, n = 2,216) versus standard information plus ‘The Gist’ leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The ‘Gist + Facts’ group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest ‘The Gist’ leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4353886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43538862015-03-13 The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial Smith, Samuel G. Raine, Rosalind Obichere, Austin Wolf, Michael S. Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian J Behav Med Article Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information (‘The Facts’, n = 2,216) versus standard information plus ‘The Gist’ leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The ‘Gist + Facts’ group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest ‘The Gist’ leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2014-09-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4353886/ /pubmed/25253443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Samuel G. Raine, Rosalind Obichere, Austin Wolf, Michael S. Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithsamuelg theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rainerosalind theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT obichereaustin theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wolfmichaels theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wardlejane theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonwagnerchristian theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smithsamuelg effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rainerosalind effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT obichereaustin effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wolfmichaels effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wardlejane effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonwagnerchristian effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |