Cargando…

The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial

Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Samuel G., Raine, Rosalind, Obichere, Austin, Wolf, Michael S., Wardle, Jane, von Wagner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z
_version_ 1782360663989944320
author Smith, Samuel G.
Raine, Rosalind
Obichere, Austin
Wolf, Michael S.
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
author_facet Smith, Samuel G.
Raine, Rosalind
Obichere, Austin
Wolf, Michael S.
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
author_sort Smith, Samuel G.
collection PubMed
description Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information (‘The Facts’, n = 2,216) versus standard information plus ‘The Gist’ leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The ‘Gist + Facts’ group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest ‘The Gist’ leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43538862015-03-13 The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial Smith, Samuel G. Raine, Rosalind Obichere, Austin Wolf, Michael S. Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian J Behav Med Article Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information (‘The Facts’, n = 2,216) versus standard information plus ‘The Gist’ leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The ‘Gist + Facts’ group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest ‘The Gist’ leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2014-09-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4353886/ /pubmed/25253443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Samuel G.
Raine, Rosalind
Obichere, Austin
Wolf, Michael S.
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsamuelg theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rainerosalind theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT obichereaustin theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolfmichaels theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wardlejane theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonwagnerchristian theeffectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smithsamuelg effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rainerosalind effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT obichereaustin effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolfmichaels effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wardlejane effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonwagnerchristian effectofasupplementarygistbasedinformationleafletoncolorectalcancerknowledgeandscreeningintentionarandomizedcontrolledtrial