Cargando…

Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review

Background Although artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in most endemic countries, they have been prohibitively expensive in the retail sector where many suspected malaria cases purchase treatment. ACT subsidies seek to stimulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Alexandra, Ward, Abigail, Moonen, Bruno, Sabot, Oliver, Cohen, Justin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu013
_version_ 1782360665857458176
author Morris, Alexandra
Ward, Abigail
Moonen, Bruno
Sabot, Oliver
Cohen, Justin M
author_facet Morris, Alexandra
Ward, Abigail
Moonen, Bruno
Sabot, Oliver
Cohen, Justin M
author_sort Morris, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description Background Although artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in most endemic countries, they have been prohibitively expensive in the retail sector where many suspected malaria cases purchase treatment. ACT subsidies seek to stimulate consumer demand for the drugs over cheaper but often ineffective alternatives by reducing their prices. Recent evidence from eight regions implementing such subsidies suggests that they are generally successful in improving availability of the drugs and decreasing their retail prices, but it remains unclear whether these outcomes translate to improved use by patients with suspected malaria. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted to identify reports of experimental or programmatic ACT subsidies to assess the impact of subsidies on consumer use. Relationships between price, use and potential confounding factors were examined using logistic and repeated measures binomial regression models, and approximate magnitudes of associations were assessed with linear regression. In total, 40 studies, 14 peer-reviewed and 26 non-peer-reviewed, were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The reviewed studies found a substantial increase in private sector ACT use following the introduction of a subsidy. Overall, each $1 decrease in price was linked to a 24 percentage point increase in the fraction of suspected malaria cases purchasing ACTs (R(2) = 0.302). No significant differences were evident in this relationship when comparing the poorest and richest groups, rural vs urban populations or children vs adults. Conclusions These findings suggest that ACT price reductions can increase their use for suspected malaria, even within poorer, more remote populations that may be most at risk of malaria mortality. Whether a subsidy is appropriate will depend upon local context, including treatment-seeking behaviours and malaria prevalence. This review provides an initial foundation for policymakers to make evidence-based decisions regarding ACT price reductions to increase use of potentially life-saving drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4353896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43538962015-03-17 Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review Morris, Alexandra Ward, Abigail Moonen, Bruno Sabot, Oliver Cohen, Justin M Health Policy Plan Reviews Background Although artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in most endemic countries, they have been prohibitively expensive in the retail sector where many suspected malaria cases purchase treatment. ACT subsidies seek to stimulate consumer demand for the drugs over cheaper but often ineffective alternatives by reducing their prices. Recent evidence from eight regions implementing such subsidies suggests that they are generally successful in improving availability of the drugs and decreasing their retail prices, but it remains unclear whether these outcomes translate to improved use by patients with suspected malaria. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted to identify reports of experimental or programmatic ACT subsidies to assess the impact of subsidies on consumer use. Relationships between price, use and potential confounding factors were examined using logistic and repeated measures binomial regression models, and approximate magnitudes of associations were assessed with linear regression. In total, 40 studies, 14 peer-reviewed and 26 non-peer-reviewed, were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The reviewed studies found a substantial increase in private sector ACT use following the introduction of a subsidy. Overall, each $1 decrease in price was linked to a 24 percentage point increase in the fraction of suspected malaria cases purchasing ACTs (R(2) = 0.302). No significant differences were evident in this relationship when comparing the poorest and richest groups, rural vs urban populations or children vs adults. Conclusions These findings suggest that ACT price reductions can increase their use for suspected malaria, even within poorer, more remote populations that may be most at risk of malaria mortality. Whether a subsidy is appropriate will depend upon local context, including treatment-seeking behaviours and malaria prevalence. This review provides an initial foundation for policymakers to make evidence-based decisions regarding ACT price reductions to increase use of potentially life-saving drugs. Oxford University Press 2015-04 2014-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4353896/ /pubmed/24633915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu013 Text en Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Morris, Alexandra
Ward, Abigail
Moonen, Bruno
Sabot, Oliver
Cohen, Justin M
Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title_full Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title_fullStr Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title_short Price subsidies increase the use of private sector ACTs: evidence from a systematic review
title_sort price subsidies increase the use of private sector acts: evidence from a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu013
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisalexandra pricesubsidiesincreasetheuseofprivatesectoractsevidencefromasystematicreview
AT wardabigail pricesubsidiesincreasetheuseofprivatesectoractsevidencefromasystematicreview
AT moonenbruno pricesubsidiesincreasetheuseofprivatesectoractsevidencefromasystematicreview
AT sabotoliver pricesubsidiesincreasetheuseofprivatesectoractsevidencefromasystematicreview
AT cohenjustinm pricesubsidiesincreasetheuseofprivatesectoractsevidencefromasystematicreview