Cargando…

Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel

BACKGROUND: Pea (Pisum sativum L.), a major pulse crop grown for its protein-rich seeds, is an important component of agroecological cropping systems in diverse regions of the world. New breeding challenges imposed by global climate change and new regulations urge pea breeders to undertake more effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burstin, Judith, Salloignon, Pauline, Chabert-Martinello, Marianne, Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard, Siol, Mathieu, Jacquin, Françoise, Chauveau, Aurélie, Pont, Caroline, Aubert, Grégoire, Delaitre, Catherine, Truntzer, Caroline, Duc, Gérard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1
_version_ 1782360840072069120
author Burstin, Judith
Salloignon, Pauline
Chabert-Martinello, Marianne
Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard
Siol, Mathieu
Jacquin, Françoise
Chauveau, Aurélie
Pont, Caroline
Aubert, Grégoire
Delaitre, Catherine
Truntzer, Caroline
Duc, Gérard
author_facet Burstin, Judith
Salloignon, Pauline
Chabert-Martinello, Marianne
Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard
Siol, Mathieu
Jacquin, Françoise
Chauveau, Aurélie
Pont, Caroline
Aubert, Grégoire
Delaitre, Catherine
Truntzer, Caroline
Duc, Gérard
author_sort Burstin, Judith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pea (Pisum sativum L.), a major pulse crop grown for its protein-rich seeds, is an important component of agroecological cropping systems in diverse regions of the world. New breeding challenges imposed by global climate change and new regulations urge pea breeders to undertake more efficient methods of selection and better take advantage of the large genetic diversity present in the Pisum sativum genepool. Diversity studies conducted so far in pea used Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) and Retrotransposon Based Insertion Polymorphism (RBIP) markers. Recently, SNP marker panels have been developed that will be useful for genetic diversity assessment and marker-assisted selection. RESULTS: A collection of diverse pea accessions, including landraces and cultivars of garden, field or fodder peas as well as wild peas was characterised at the molecular level using newly developed SNP markers, as well as SSR markers and RBIP markers. The three types of markers were used to describe the structure of the collection and revealed different pictures of the genetic diversity among the collection. SSR showed the fastest rate of evolution and RBIP the slowest rate of evolution, pointing to their contrasted mode of evolution. SNP markers were then used to predict phenotypes -the date of flowering (BegFlo), the number of seeds per plant (Nseed) and thousand seed weight (TSW)- that were recorded for the collection. Different statistical methods were tested including the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage ans Selection Operator), PLS (Partial Least Squares), SPLS (Sparse Partial Least Squares), Bayes A, Bayes B and GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) methods and the structure of the collection was taken into account in the prediction. Despite a limited number of 331 markers used for prediction, TSW was reliably predicted. CONCLUSION: The development of marker assisted selection has not reached its full potential in pea until now. This paper shows that the high-throughput SNP arrays that are being developed will most probably allow for a more efficient selection in this species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4355348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43553482015-03-12 Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel Burstin, Judith Salloignon, Pauline Chabert-Martinello, Marianne Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard Siol, Mathieu Jacquin, Françoise Chauveau, Aurélie Pont, Caroline Aubert, Grégoire Delaitre, Catherine Truntzer, Caroline Duc, Gérard BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Pea (Pisum sativum L.), a major pulse crop grown for its protein-rich seeds, is an important component of agroecological cropping systems in diverse regions of the world. New breeding challenges imposed by global climate change and new regulations urge pea breeders to undertake more efficient methods of selection and better take advantage of the large genetic diversity present in the Pisum sativum genepool. Diversity studies conducted so far in pea used Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) and Retrotransposon Based Insertion Polymorphism (RBIP) markers. Recently, SNP marker panels have been developed that will be useful for genetic diversity assessment and marker-assisted selection. RESULTS: A collection of diverse pea accessions, including landraces and cultivars of garden, field or fodder peas as well as wild peas was characterised at the molecular level using newly developed SNP markers, as well as SSR markers and RBIP markers. The three types of markers were used to describe the structure of the collection and revealed different pictures of the genetic diversity among the collection. SSR showed the fastest rate of evolution and RBIP the slowest rate of evolution, pointing to their contrasted mode of evolution. SNP markers were then used to predict phenotypes -the date of flowering (BegFlo), the number of seeds per plant (Nseed) and thousand seed weight (TSW)- that were recorded for the collection. Different statistical methods were tested including the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage ans Selection Operator), PLS (Partial Least Squares), SPLS (Sparse Partial Least Squares), Bayes A, Bayes B and GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) methods and the structure of the collection was taken into account in the prediction. Despite a limited number of 331 markers used for prediction, TSW was reliably predicted. CONCLUSION: The development of marker assisted selection has not reached its full potential in pea until now. This paper shows that the high-throughput SNP arrays that are being developed will most probably allow for a more efficient selection in this species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4355348/ /pubmed/25765216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1 Text en © Burstin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burstin, Judith
Salloignon, Pauline
Chabert-Martinello, Marianne
Magnin-Robert, Jean-Bernard
Siol, Mathieu
Jacquin, Françoise
Chauveau, Aurélie
Pont, Caroline
Aubert, Grégoire
Delaitre, Catherine
Truntzer, Caroline
Duc, Gérard
Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title_full Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title_fullStr Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title_full_unstemmed Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title_short Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
title_sort genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1266-1
work_keys_str_mv AT burstinjudith geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT salloignonpauline geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT chabertmartinellomarianne geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT magninrobertjeanbernard geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT siolmathieu geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT jacquinfrancoise geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT chauveauaurelie geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT pontcaroline geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT aubertgregoire geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT delaitrecatherine geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT truntzercaroline geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel
AT ducgerard geneticdiversityandtraitgenomicpredictioninapeadiversitypanel