Cargando…
Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods
BACKGROUND: The use of the generic term “meat and animal derivatives” in declared ingredient lists of pet foods in the European Union is virtually universal. In the wake of the 2013 “horse meat scandal” in the human food chain, we examined the presence and authenticity of animal sources (cow, chicke...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0097-z |
_version_ | 1782360859509522432 |
---|---|
author | Maine, Isabella R Atterbury, Robert Chang, Kin-Chow |
author_facet | Maine, Isabella R Atterbury, Robert Chang, Kin-Chow |
author_sort | Maine, Isabella R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of the generic term “meat and animal derivatives” in declared ingredient lists of pet foods in the European Union is virtually universal. In the wake of the 2013 “horse meat scandal” in the human food chain, we examined the presence and authenticity of animal sources (cow, chicken, pig and horse) of proteins in a range of popular wet pet foods in the United Kingdom. FINDINGS: Seventeen leading dog and cat foods were sampled for the relative presence of DNA from each of the four animal species by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. No horse DNA was detected. However, there was detection at substantial levels of unspecified animal species in most products tested. In 14 out of 17 samples, bovine, porcine and chicken DNA were found in various proportions and combinations but were not explicitly identified on the product labels. Of the 7 products with prominent headline descriptions containing the term “with beef”, only 2 were found to contain more bovine DNA (>50%) than pig and chicken DNA combined. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for the pet food industry to show greater transparency to customers in the disclosure of the types of animal proteins (animal species and tissue types) in their products. Full disclosure of animal contents will (a) allow more informed choices to be made on purchases which are particularly important for pets with food allergies, (b) reduce the risk of product misinterpretation by shoppers, and (c) avoid potential religious concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4355460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43554602015-03-12 Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods Maine, Isabella R Atterbury, Robert Chang, Kin-Chow Acta Vet Scand Brief Communication BACKGROUND: The use of the generic term “meat and animal derivatives” in declared ingredient lists of pet foods in the European Union is virtually universal. In the wake of the 2013 “horse meat scandal” in the human food chain, we examined the presence and authenticity of animal sources (cow, chicken, pig and horse) of proteins in a range of popular wet pet foods in the United Kingdom. FINDINGS: Seventeen leading dog and cat foods were sampled for the relative presence of DNA from each of the four animal species by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. No horse DNA was detected. However, there was detection at substantial levels of unspecified animal species in most products tested. In 14 out of 17 samples, bovine, porcine and chicken DNA were found in various proportions and combinations but were not explicitly identified on the product labels. Of the 7 products with prominent headline descriptions containing the term “with beef”, only 2 were found to contain more bovine DNA (>50%) than pig and chicken DNA combined. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for the pet food industry to show greater transparency to customers in the disclosure of the types of animal proteins (animal species and tissue types) in their products. Full disclosure of animal contents will (a) allow more informed choices to be made on purchases which are particularly important for pets with food allergies, (b) reduce the risk of product misinterpretation by shoppers, and (c) avoid potential religious concerns. BioMed Central 2015-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4355460/ /pubmed/25886611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0097-z Text en © Maine et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Maine, Isabella R Atterbury, Robert Chang, Kin-Chow Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title | Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title_full | Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title_fullStr | Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title_short | Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
title_sort | investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0097-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maineisabellar investigationintotheanimalspeciescontentsofpopularwetpetfoods AT atterburyrobert investigationintotheanimalspeciescontentsofpopularwetpetfoods AT changkinchow investigationintotheanimalspeciescontentsofpopularwetpetfoods |