Cargando…

The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation

INTRODUCTION: In this cohort study, we investigated whether monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils (myelocytes, metamyelocytes and band cells) differentiated patients with sepsis from those with the non-infectious (N-I) systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We also ascertained if...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mare, Tracey Anne, Treacher, David Floyd, Shankar-Hari, Manu, Beale, Richard, Lewis, Sion Marc, Chambers, David John, Brown, Kenneth Alun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0778-z
_version_ 1782360873502769152
author Mare, Tracey Anne
Treacher, David Floyd
Shankar-Hari, Manu
Beale, Richard
Lewis, Sion Marc
Chambers, David John
Brown, Kenneth Alun
author_facet Mare, Tracey Anne
Treacher, David Floyd
Shankar-Hari, Manu
Beale, Richard
Lewis, Sion Marc
Chambers, David John
Brown, Kenneth Alun
author_sort Mare, Tracey Anne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In this cohort study, we investigated whether monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils (myelocytes, metamyelocytes and band cells) differentiated patients with sepsis from those with the non-infectious (N-I) systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We also ascertained if the appearance of circulating immature neutrophils was related to adverse outcome. METHODS: Blood samples were routinely taken from 136 critically ill patients within 48 hours of ICU entry and from 20 healthy control subjects. Clinical and laboratory staff were blinded to each other’s results, and patients were retrospectively characterised into those with SIRS (n = 122) and those without SIRS (n = 14). The patients with SIRS were further subdivided into categories of definite sepsis (n = 51), possible sepsis (n = 32) and N-I SIRS (n = 39). Two established criteria were used for monitoring immature white blood cells (WBCs): one where band cells >10% WBCs and the other where >10% of all forms of immature neutrophils were included but with a normal WBC count. Immature neutrophils in blood smears were identified according to nuclear morphology and cytoplasmic staining. RESULTS: With the first criterion, band cells were present in most patients with SIRS (mean = 66%) when compared with no SIRS (mean = 29%; P <0.01) and with healthy subjects (0%). The prevalence of band cells was higher in definite sepsis (mean = 82%) than in patients with possible sepsis (mean = 63%; P <0.05) or with N-I SIRS (mean = 39%; P <0.001), and they had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 71% for the detection of definite sepsis. With the second criterion (that is, patients with normal WBC counts), we noted that immature neutrophils did not differentiate any of the patient groups from one another. Patients who died within 1 week of blood sample provision had higher levels of myelocytes and metamyelocytes (median = 9%; P <0.05) than patients who died at 2 to 4 weeks (median =0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Raised blood levels of band cells have diagnostic significance for sepsis, provided that measurements are not confined to patients with normal WBC counts, whereas an increased prevalence of myelocytes and metamyelocytes may have prognostic application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4355545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43555452015-03-12 The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation Mare, Tracey Anne Treacher, David Floyd Shankar-Hari, Manu Beale, Richard Lewis, Sion Marc Chambers, David John Brown, Kenneth Alun Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: In this cohort study, we investigated whether monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils (myelocytes, metamyelocytes and band cells) differentiated patients with sepsis from those with the non-infectious (N-I) systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We also ascertained if the appearance of circulating immature neutrophils was related to adverse outcome. METHODS: Blood samples were routinely taken from 136 critically ill patients within 48 hours of ICU entry and from 20 healthy control subjects. Clinical and laboratory staff were blinded to each other’s results, and patients were retrospectively characterised into those with SIRS (n = 122) and those without SIRS (n = 14). The patients with SIRS were further subdivided into categories of definite sepsis (n = 51), possible sepsis (n = 32) and N-I SIRS (n = 39). Two established criteria were used for monitoring immature white blood cells (WBCs): one where band cells >10% WBCs and the other where >10% of all forms of immature neutrophils were included but with a normal WBC count. Immature neutrophils in blood smears were identified according to nuclear morphology and cytoplasmic staining. RESULTS: With the first criterion, band cells were present in most patients with SIRS (mean = 66%) when compared with no SIRS (mean = 29%; P <0.01) and with healthy subjects (0%). The prevalence of band cells was higher in definite sepsis (mean = 82%) than in patients with possible sepsis (mean = 63%; P <0.05) or with N-I SIRS (mean = 39%; P <0.001), and they had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 71% for the detection of definite sepsis. With the second criterion (that is, patients with normal WBC counts), we noted that immature neutrophils did not differentiate any of the patient groups from one another. Patients who died within 1 week of blood sample provision had higher levels of myelocytes and metamyelocytes (median = 9%; P <0.05) than patients who died at 2 to 4 weeks (median =0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Raised blood levels of band cells have diagnostic significance for sepsis, provided that measurements are not confined to patients with normal WBC counts, whereas an increased prevalence of myelocytes and metamyelocytes may have prognostic application. BioMed Central 2015-02-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4355545/ /pubmed/25887201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0778-z Text en © Mare et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mare, Tracey Anne
Treacher, David Floyd
Shankar-Hari, Manu
Beale, Richard
Lewis, Sion Marc
Chambers, David John
Brown, Kenneth Alun
The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title_full The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title_fullStr The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title_short The diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
title_sort diagnostic and prognostic significance of monitoring blood levels of immature neutrophils in patients with systemic inflammation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0778-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maretraceyanne thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT treacherdavidfloyd thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT shankarharimanu thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT bealerichard thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT lewissionmarc thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT chambersdavidjohn thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT brownkennethalun thediagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT maretraceyanne diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT treacherdavidfloyd diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT shankarharimanu diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT bealerichard diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT lewissionmarc diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT chambersdavidjohn diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation
AT brownkennethalun diagnosticandprognosticsignificanceofmonitoringbloodlevelsofimmatureneutrophilsinpatientswithsystemicinflammation