Cargando…

The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommended a new strategy for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, no study has indicated that adopting the IADPSG recommendations improves perinatal outcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Tai-Ho, Hsieh, T’sang-T’ang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25756838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122261
_version_ 1782360888719704064
author Hung, Tai-Ho
Hsieh, T’sang-T’ang
author_facet Hung, Tai-Ho
Hsieh, T’sang-T’ang
author_sort Hung, Tai-Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommended a new strategy for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, no study has indicated that adopting the IADPSG recommendations improves perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing the IADPSG criteria for diagnosing GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Previously, we used a two-step approach (a 1-h, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-h, 100-g glucose tolerance test when indicated) to screen for and diagnose GDM. In July 2011, we adopted the IADPSG recommendations in our routine obstetric care. In this study, we retrospectively compared the rates of various maternal and neonatal outcomes in all women who delivered after 24 weeks of gestation during the periods before (P1, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010) and after (P2, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013) the IADPSG criteria were implemented. Pregnancies complicated by multiple gestations, fetal chromosomal or structural anomalies, and pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus were excluded. Our results showed that the incidence of GDM increased from 4.6% using the two-step method to 12.4% using the IADPSG criteria. Compared to the women in P1, the women in P2 experienced less weight gain during pregnancy, lower birth weights, shorter labor courses, and lower rates of macrosomia (<4000 g) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. P2 was a significant independent factor against macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.90) and LGA (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.89) after multivariable logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The adoption of the IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM was associated with significant reductions in maternal weight gain during pregnancy, birth weights, and the rates of macrosomia and LGA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4355616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43556162015-03-17 The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Hung, Tai-Ho Hsieh, T’sang-T’ang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2010, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommended a new strategy for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, no study has indicated that adopting the IADPSG recommendations improves perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing the IADPSG criteria for diagnosing GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Previously, we used a two-step approach (a 1-h, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-h, 100-g glucose tolerance test when indicated) to screen for and diagnose GDM. In July 2011, we adopted the IADPSG recommendations in our routine obstetric care. In this study, we retrospectively compared the rates of various maternal and neonatal outcomes in all women who delivered after 24 weeks of gestation during the periods before (P1, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010) and after (P2, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013) the IADPSG criteria were implemented. Pregnancies complicated by multiple gestations, fetal chromosomal or structural anomalies, and pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus were excluded. Our results showed that the incidence of GDM increased from 4.6% using the two-step method to 12.4% using the IADPSG criteria. Compared to the women in P1, the women in P2 experienced less weight gain during pregnancy, lower birth weights, shorter labor courses, and lower rates of macrosomia (<4000 g) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. P2 was a significant independent factor against macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.90) and LGA (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.89) after multivariable logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The adoption of the IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM was associated with significant reductions in maternal weight gain during pregnancy, birth weights, and the rates of macrosomia and LGA. Public Library of Science 2015-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4355616/ /pubmed/25756838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122261 Text en © 2015 Hung, Hsieh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hung, Tai-Ho
Hsieh, T’sang-T’ang
The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title_full The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title_fullStr The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title_short The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
title_sort effects of implementing the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25756838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122261
work_keys_str_mv AT hungtaiho theeffectsofimplementingtheinternationalassociationofdiabetesandpregnancystudygroupscriteriafordiagnosinggestationaldiabetesonmaternalandneonataloutcomes
AT hsiehtsangtang theeffectsofimplementingtheinternationalassociationofdiabetesandpregnancystudygroupscriteriafordiagnosinggestationaldiabetesonmaternalandneonataloutcomes
AT hungtaiho effectsofimplementingtheinternationalassociationofdiabetesandpregnancystudygroupscriteriafordiagnosinggestationaldiabetesonmaternalandneonataloutcomes
AT hsiehtsangtang effectsofimplementingtheinternationalassociationofdiabetesandpregnancystudygroupscriteriafordiagnosinggestationaldiabetesonmaternalandneonataloutcomes