Cargando…
Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment
BACKGROUND: Superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a benign condition in which a surgical treatment may be considered depending on the patients’ tolerance of their symptoms. In this study, we aim to identify driving factors behind the patients’ choice of a surgical management over watchful waiting. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780478 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2105w |
_version_ | 1782360954017677312 |
---|---|
author | Benamira, Lina Zahra Maniakas, Anastasios Alzahrani, Musaed Saliba, Issam |
author_facet | Benamira, Lina Zahra Maniakas, Anastasios Alzahrani, Musaed Saliba, Issam |
author_sort | Benamira, Lina Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a benign condition in which a surgical treatment may be considered depending on the patients’ tolerance of their symptoms. In this study, we aim to identify driving factors behind the patients’ choice of a surgical management over watchful waiting. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with cochlear and/or vestibular symptoms and a temporal bone high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan showing SCD were included in the study. All patients have been offered either surgical management or watchful waiting. RESULTS: Of these, 28 elected surgery and 34 declined it. The operated group showed more cochlear (6.6 vs. 2.4) symptoms than the non-operated group (P < 0.001) except for hypoacousis, but no significant difference (P = 0.059) was found for the number of vestibular symptoms between both groups (3.4 vs. 1.1). Footstep and eating hyperacousis were both present in 57.1% of operated vs. 3% of non-operated patients (P < 0.001). Oscillopsia with effort and with walking was found in 50% and 35.7% of operated patients, respectively, but none in the non-operated group (P < 0.001). Hearing tuning fork at malleolus and Valsalva and pneumatic speculum induced vertigo showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.010 respectively). Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds, air and bone conduction thresholds, and mean air-bone gap (ABG) were similar in the two populations (P > 0.05). The average dehiscence size was 4.7 mm (2.0 - 8.0 mm) and 3.8 mm (1.3 - 7.7 mm) in the operated and non-operated patients, respectively (P = 0.421). CONCLUSIONS: The natures of cochleovestibular signs and symptoms were shown to be key factors in patients’ choice of a surgical management whereas paraclinical tests seem to be less significant in the patients’ decision for a surgical treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4356090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43560902015-03-16 Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment Benamira, Lina Zahra Maniakas, Anastasios Alzahrani, Musaed Saliba, Issam J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a benign condition in which a surgical treatment may be considered depending on the patients’ tolerance of their symptoms. In this study, we aim to identify driving factors behind the patients’ choice of a surgical management over watchful waiting. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with cochlear and/or vestibular symptoms and a temporal bone high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan showing SCD were included in the study. All patients have been offered either surgical management or watchful waiting. RESULTS: Of these, 28 elected surgery and 34 declined it. The operated group showed more cochlear (6.6 vs. 2.4) symptoms than the non-operated group (P < 0.001) except for hypoacousis, but no significant difference (P = 0.059) was found for the number of vestibular symptoms between both groups (3.4 vs. 1.1). Footstep and eating hyperacousis were both present in 57.1% of operated vs. 3% of non-operated patients (P < 0.001). Oscillopsia with effort and with walking was found in 50% and 35.7% of operated patients, respectively, but none in the non-operated group (P < 0.001). Hearing tuning fork at malleolus and Valsalva and pneumatic speculum induced vertigo showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.010 respectively). Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds, air and bone conduction thresholds, and mean air-bone gap (ABG) were similar in the two populations (P > 0.05). The average dehiscence size was 4.7 mm (2.0 - 8.0 mm) and 3.8 mm (1.3 - 7.7 mm) in the operated and non-operated patients, respectively (P = 0.421). CONCLUSIONS: The natures of cochleovestibular signs and symptoms were shown to be key factors in patients’ choice of a surgical management whereas paraclinical tests seem to be less significant in the patients’ decision for a surgical treatment. Elmer Press 2015-05 2015-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4356090/ /pubmed/25780478 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2105w Text en Copyright 2015, Benamira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Benamira, Lina Zahra Maniakas, Anastasios Alzahrani, Musaed Saliba, Issam Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title | Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title_full | Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title_fullStr | Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title_short | Common Features in Patients With Superior Canal Dehiscence Declining Surgical Treatment |
title_sort | common features in patients with superior canal dehiscence declining surgical treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780478 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2105w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benamiralinazahra commonfeaturesinpatientswithsuperiorcanaldehiscencedecliningsurgicaltreatment AT maniakasanastasios commonfeaturesinpatientswithsuperiorcanaldehiscencedecliningsurgicaltreatment AT alzahranimusaed commonfeaturesinpatientswithsuperiorcanaldehiscencedecliningsurgicaltreatment AT salibaissam commonfeaturesinpatientswithsuperiorcanaldehiscencedecliningsurgicaltreatment |