Cargando…

Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study

BACKGROUND: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwasaki, Yasushi, Shimada, Junichi, Kato, Daishiro, Nishimura, Motohiro, Ito, Kazuhiro, Terauchi, Kunihiko, Shimomura, Masanori, Tsunezuka, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0228-7
_version_ 1782360958261264384
author Iwasaki, Yasushi
Shimada, Junichi
Kato, Daishiro
Nishimura, Motohiro
Ito, Kazuhiro
Terauchi, Kunihiko
Shimomura, Masanori
Tsunezuka, Hiroaki
author_facet Iwasaki, Yasushi
Shimada, Junichi
Kato, Daishiro
Nishimura, Motohiro
Ito, Kazuhiro
Terauchi, Kunihiko
Shimomura, Masanori
Tsunezuka, Hiroaki
author_sort Iwasaki, Yasushi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance. METHODS: Hospitals associated with the Division of Chest Surgery of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine held joint meetings involving their thoracic surgeons and operating room nurses between February 2011 and November 2012 to standardize surgical tasks. Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization. RESULTS: The implementation rate of standardized surgical tasks was 97%. The pre-operative (from entry to the operating room until commencement of surgery) and post-operative (from conclusion of surgery until departure from the operating room) times were significantly decreased after the standardization. When compared according to operative group (all thoracic surgery, lung lobectomy, and partial lung resection), operation times were shorter for all three groups; in addition, the amount of blood loss was lower in all three groups after standardization. A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary standardization of surgical tasks across institutions improved thoracic surgery tasks and surgical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4356109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43561092015-03-12 Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study Iwasaki, Yasushi Shimada, Junichi Kato, Daishiro Nishimura, Motohiro Ito, Kazuhiro Terauchi, Kunihiko Shimomura, Masanori Tsunezuka, Hiroaki J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment protocols (including those for thoracic surgery) tend to be customized for individual hospitals. Procedural standardization is required to improve surgical tasks and patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an initiative to standardize surgical tasks for efficient and safe performance. METHODS: Hospitals associated with the Division of Chest Surgery of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine held joint meetings involving their thoracic surgeons and operating room nurses between February 2011 and November 2012 to standardize surgical tasks. Operation times and blood loss were compared before and after standardization. RESULTS: The implementation rate of standardized surgical tasks was 97%. The pre-operative (from entry to the operating room until commencement of surgery) and post-operative (from conclusion of surgery until departure from the operating room) times were significantly decreased after the standardization. When compared according to operative group (all thoracic surgery, lung lobectomy, and partial lung resection), operation times were shorter for all three groups; in addition, the amount of blood loss was lower in all three groups after standardization. A post-standardization survey showed improved morale among the meeting participants. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary standardization of surgical tasks across institutions improved thoracic surgery tasks and surgical outcomes. BioMed Central 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4356109/ /pubmed/25890203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0228-7 Text en © Iwasaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iwasaki, Yasushi
Shimada, Junichi
Kato, Daishiro
Nishimura, Motohiro
Ito, Kazuhiro
Terauchi, Kunihiko
Shimomura, Masanori
Tsunezuka, Hiroaki
Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title_full Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title_fullStr Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title_full_unstemmed Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title_short Improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
title_sort improvements in thoracic surgery outcomes: a multi-institutional collaboration study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0228-7
work_keys_str_mv AT iwasakiyasushi improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT shimadajunichi improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT katodaishiro improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT nishimuramotohiro improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT itokazuhiro improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT terauchikunihiko improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT shimomuramasanori improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy
AT tsunezukahiroaki improvementsinthoracicsurgeryoutcomesamultiinstitutionalcollaborationstudy