Cargando…
A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology
An extensive range of serological and molecular diagnostic assays exist for most of the economically important Theileira species such as T. annulata, T. equi, T. lestoquardi, T. parva, T. uilenbergi and other more benign species. Diagnostics of Theileria is considered with regard to sensitivity and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25830110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.006 |
_version_ | 1782361056315703296 |
---|---|
author | Mans, Ben J. Pienaar, Ronel Latif, Abdalla A. |
author_facet | Mans, Ben J. Pienaar, Ronel Latif, Abdalla A. |
author_sort | Mans, Ben J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An extensive range of serological and molecular diagnostic assays exist for most of the economically important Theileira species such as T. annulata, T. equi, T. lestoquardi, T. parva, T. uilenbergi and other more benign species. Diagnostics of Theileria is considered with regard to sensitivity and specificity of current molecular and serological assays and their use in epidemiology. In the case of serological assays, cross-reactivity of genetically closely related species reduces the use of the gold standard indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). Development of antigen-specific assays does not necessarily address this problem, since closely related species will potentially have similar antigens. Even so, serological assays remain an important line of enquiry in epidemiological surveys. Molecular based assays have exploded in the last decade with significant improvements in sensitivity and specificity. In this review, the current interpretation of what constitute a species in Theileria and its impact on accurate molecular diagnostics is considered. Most molecular assays based on conventional or real-time PCR technology have proven to be on standard with regard to analytical sensitivity. However, consideration of the limits of detection in regard to total blood volume of an animal indicates that most assays may only detect >400,000 parasites/L blood. Even so, natural parasitaemia distribution in carrier-state animals seems to be above this limit of detection, suggesting that most molecular assays should be able to detect the majority of infected individuals under endemic conditions. The potential for false-negative results can, however, only be assessed within the biological context of the parasite within its vertebrate host, i.e. parasitaemia range in the carrier-state that will support infection of the vector and subsequent transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4356873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43568732015-03-31 A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology Mans, Ben J. Pienaar, Ronel Latif, Abdalla A. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl Invited Review An extensive range of serological and molecular diagnostic assays exist for most of the economically important Theileira species such as T. annulata, T. equi, T. lestoquardi, T. parva, T. uilenbergi and other more benign species. Diagnostics of Theileria is considered with regard to sensitivity and specificity of current molecular and serological assays and their use in epidemiology. In the case of serological assays, cross-reactivity of genetically closely related species reduces the use of the gold standard indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). Development of antigen-specific assays does not necessarily address this problem, since closely related species will potentially have similar antigens. Even so, serological assays remain an important line of enquiry in epidemiological surveys. Molecular based assays have exploded in the last decade with significant improvements in sensitivity and specificity. In this review, the current interpretation of what constitute a species in Theileria and its impact on accurate molecular diagnostics is considered. Most molecular assays based on conventional or real-time PCR technology have proven to be on standard with regard to analytical sensitivity. However, consideration of the limits of detection in regard to total blood volume of an animal indicates that most assays may only detect >400,000 parasites/L blood. Even so, natural parasitaemia distribution in carrier-state animals seems to be above this limit of detection, suggesting that most molecular assays should be able to detect the majority of infected individuals under endemic conditions. The potential for false-negative results can, however, only be assessed within the biological context of the parasite within its vertebrate host, i.e. parasitaemia range in the carrier-state that will support infection of the vector and subsequent transmission. Elsevier 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4356873/ /pubmed/25830110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.006 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Mans, Ben J. Pienaar, Ronel Latif, Abdalla A. A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title | A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title_full | A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title_fullStr | A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title_short | A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
title_sort | review of theileria diagnostics and epidemiology |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25830110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansbenj areviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology AT pienaarronel areviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology AT latifabdallaa areviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology AT mansbenj reviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology AT pienaarronel reviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology AT latifabdallaa reviewoftheileriadiagnosticsandepidemiology |