Cargando…

Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using several screening tools in an Irish community-dwelling older cohort, to assess if the prevalence changes over time and to determine factors associated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moriarty, Frank, Bennett, Kathleen, Fahey, Tom, Kenny, Rose Anne, Cahir, Caitriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25666030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1815-1
_version_ 1782361059015786496
author Moriarty, Frank
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Kenny, Rose Anne
Cahir, Caitriona
author_facet Moriarty, Frank
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Kenny, Rose Anne
Cahir, Caitriona
author_sort Moriarty, Frank
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using several screening tools in an Irish community-dwelling older cohort, to assess if the prevalence changes over time and to determine factors associated with any change. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of participants aged ≥65 years in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) with linked pharmacy claims data (n = 2051). PIM and PPO prevalence was measured in the year preceding participants’ TILDA baseline interviews and in the year preceding their follow-up interviews using the Screening Tool for Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP), Beers criteria (2012), Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) indicators and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START). Generalised estimating equations were used to determine factors associated with change in prevalence over time. RESULTS: Depending on the screening tool used, between 19.8 % (ACOVE indicators) and 52.7 % (STOPP) of participants received a PIM at baseline, and PPO prevalence ranged from 38.2 % (START) to 44.8 % (ACOVE indicators), while 36.7 % of participants had both a PIM and PPO. Common criteria were aspirin for primary prevention (19.6 %) and omission of calcium/vitamin D in osteoporosis (14.7 %). Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs increased at follow-up (PIMs range 22–56.1 %, PPOs range 40.5–49.3 %), and this was associated with patient age, female sex, and numbers of medicines and chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal prescribing is common in older patients. Ongoing prescribing review to optimise care is important, particularly as patients get older, receive more medicines or develop more illnesses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1815-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4356885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43568852015-03-18 Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people Moriarty, Frank Bennett, Kathleen Fahey, Tom Kenny, Rose Anne Cahir, Caitriona Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using several screening tools in an Irish community-dwelling older cohort, to assess if the prevalence changes over time and to determine factors associated with any change. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of participants aged ≥65 years in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) with linked pharmacy claims data (n = 2051). PIM and PPO prevalence was measured in the year preceding participants’ TILDA baseline interviews and in the year preceding their follow-up interviews using the Screening Tool for Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP), Beers criteria (2012), Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) indicators and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START). Generalised estimating equations were used to determine factors associated with change in prevalence over time. RESULTS: Depending on the screening tool used, between 19.8 % (ACOVE indicators) and 52.7 % (STOPP) of participants received a PIM at baseline, and PPO prevalence ranged from 38.2 % (START) to 44.8 % (ACOVE indicators), while 36.7 % of participants had both a PIM and PPO. Common criteria were aspirin for primary prevention (19.6 %) and omission of calcium/vitamin D in osteoporosis (14.7 %). Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs increased at follow-up (PIMs range 22–56.1 %, PPOs range 40.5–49.3 %), and this was associated with patient age, female sex, and numbers of medicines and chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal prescribing is common in older patients. Ongoing prescribing review to optimise care is important, particularly as patients get older, receive more medicines or develop more illnesses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1815-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-11 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4356885/ /pubmed/25666030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1815-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
Moriarty, Frank
Bennett, Kathleen
Fahey, Tom
Kenny, Rose Anne
Cahir, Caitriona
Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title_full Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title_fullStr Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title_short Longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
title_sort longitudinal prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicines and potential prescribing omissions in a cohort of community-dwelling older people
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25666030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1815-1
work_keys_str_mv AT moriartyfrank longitudinalprevalenceofpotentiallyinappropriatemedicinesandpotentialprescribingomissionsinacohortofcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT bennettkathleen longitudinalprevalenceofpotentiallyinappropriatemedicinesandpotentialprescribingomissionsinacohortofcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT faheytom longitudinalprevalenceofpotentiallyinappropriatemedicinesandpotentialprescribingomissionsinacohortofcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT kennyroseanne longitudinalprevalenceofpotentiallyinappropriatemedicinesandpotentialprescribingomissionsinacohortofcommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT cahircaitriona longitudinalprevalenceofpotentiallyinappropriatemedicinesandpotentialprescribingomissionsinacohortofcommunitydwellingolderpeople