Cargando…
Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives
BACKGROUND: Many publicly-funded health systems apply cost-benefit frameworks in response to the moral dilemma of how best to allocate scarce healthcare resources. However, implementation of recommendations based on costs and benefit calculations and subsequent challenges have led to ‘special cases’...
Autores principales: | McHugh, Neil, Baker, Rachel M, Mason, Helen, Williamson, Laura, van Exel, Job, Deogaonkar, Rohan, Collins, Marissa, Donaldson, Cam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4357067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0008-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are life-extending treatments for terminal illnesses a special case? Exploring choices and societal viewpoints
por: McHugh, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is “end of life” a special case? Connecting Q with survey methods to measure societal support for views on the value of life‐extending treatments
por: Mason, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices
por: Baker, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting
por: Reckers-Droog, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Who knows best? A Q methodology study to explore perspectives of professional stakeholders and community participants on health in low-income communities
por: McHugh, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)