Cargando…

A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients

BACKGROUND: Patient age is one of many potential risk factors for fracture nonunion. Our hypothesis is that older patients (≥60) with fracture risk factors treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) have similar heal rate (HR) to the population as a whole. We evaluate the impact of age in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zura, Robert, Mehta, Samir, Rocca, Gregory J Della, Jones, John, Steen, R Grant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4357153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0498-1
_version_ 1782361105548443648
author Zura, Robert
Mehta, Samir
Rocca, Gregory J Della
Jones, John
Steen, R Grant
author_facet Zura, Robert
Mehta, Samir
Rocca, Gregory J Della
Jones, John
Steen, R Grant
author_sort Zura, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient age is one of many potential risk factors for fracture nonunion. Our hypothesis is that older patients (≥60) with fracture risk factors treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) have similar heal rate (HR) to the population as a whole. We evaluate the impact of age in conjunction with other risk factors on HR in LIPUS-treated patients with fresh fracture (≤90 days old). METHODS: The Exogen Bone Healing System is a LIPUS device approved in 1994 to accelerate healing of fresh fracture. After approval, the FDA required a Post-Market Registry to assess performance. Patient data collected from October 1994 until October 1998 were individually reviewed and validated by a registered nurse. Four distinct data elements were required to report a patient: date fracture occurred; date treatment began; date treatment ended; and a dichotomous outcome of healed v. failed, by clinical and radiological criteria. Data were used to calculate two derived variables; days to treatment (DTT) and days on treatment (DOT). Every validated fresh fracture patient with DTT, DOT, and outcome is reported. RESULTS: The validated registry had 5,765 patients with fresh fracture; 73% (N = 4,190) are reported, while 13% of patients were lost to follow-up, 11% withdrew or were non-compliant, and 3% died or are missing outcome. Among treatment-compliant patients, HR was 96.2%. Logistic estimates of the odds ratio for healing are equivalent for patients age 30 to 79 years and all age cohorts had a HR > 94%. Open fracture, current smoking, diabetes, vascular insufficiency, osteoporosis, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and prescription NSAIDs all reduced HR, but older patients (≥60) had similar HRs to the population as a whole. DTT was significantly shorter for patients who healed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid conditions in conjunction with aging can reduce fracture HR. Patients with fracture who used LIPUS had a 96% HR, whereas the expected HR averages 93%. Time to treatment was significantly shorter among patients who healed (p < 0.0001), suggesting that it is beneficial to begin LIPUS treatment early. Older patients (≥60) with fracture risk factors treated with LIPUS exhibit similar heal rates to the population as a whole.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4357153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43571532015-03-13 A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients Zura, Robert Mehta, Samir Rocca, Gregory J Della Jones, John Steen, R Grant BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient age is one of many potential risk factors for fracture nonunion. Our hypothesis is that older patients (≥60) with fracture risk factors treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) have similar heal rate (HR) to the population as a whole. We evaluate the impact of age in conjunction with other risk factors on HR in LIPUS-treated patients with fresh fracture (≤90 days old). METHODS: The Exogen Bone Healing System is a LIPUS device approved in 1994 to accelerate healing of fresh fracture. After approval, the FDA required a Post-Market Registry to assess performance. Patient data collected from October 1994 until October 1998 were individually reviewed and validated by a registered nurse. Four distinct data elements were required to report a patient: date fracture occurred; date treatment began; date treatment ended; and a dichotomous outcome of healed v. failed, by clinical and radiological criteria. Data were used to calculate two derived variables; days to treatment (DTT) and days on treatment (DOT). Every validated fresh fracture patient with DTT, DOT, and outcome is reported. RESULTS: The validated registry had 5,765 patients with fresh fracture; 73% (N = 4,190) are reported, while 13% of patients were lost to follow-up, 11% withdrew or were non-compliant, and 3% died or are missing outcome. Among treatment-compliant patients, HR was 96.2%. Logistic estimates of the odds ratio for healing are equivalent for patients age 30 to 79 years and all age cohorts had a HR > 94%. Open fracture, current smoking, diabetes, vascular insufficiency, osteoporosis, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and prescription NSAIDs all reduced HR, but older patients (≥60) had similar HRs to the population as a whole. DTT was significantly shorter for patients who healed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid conditions in conjunction with aging can reduce fracture HR. Patients with fracture who used LIPUS had a 96% HR, whereas the expected HR averages 93%. Time to treatment was significantly shorter among patients who healed (p < 0.0001), suggesting that it is beneficial to begin LIPUS treatment early. Older patients (≥60) with fracture risk factors treated with LIPUS exhibit similar heal rates to the population as a whole. BioMed Central 2015-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4357153/ /pubmed/25886761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0498-1 Text en © Zura et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zura, Robert
Mehta, Samir
Rocca, Gregory J Della
Jones, John
Steen, R Grant
A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title_full A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title_fullStr A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title_full_unstemmed A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title_short A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients
title_sort cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (lipus): findings in the elderly versus all patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4357153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0498-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zurarobert acohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT mehtasamir acohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT roccagregoryjdella acohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT jonesjohn acohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT steenrgrant acohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT zurarobert cohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT mehtasamir cohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT roccagregoryjdella cohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT jonesjohn cohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients
AT steenrgrant cohortstudyof4190patientstreatedwithlowintensitypulsedultrasoundlipusfindingsintheelderlyversusallpatients