Cargando…

Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives

Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strickler, Susan R., Bombarely, Aureliano, Munkvold, Jesse D., York, Thomas, Menda, Naama, Martin, Gregory B., Mueller, Lukas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780758
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793
_version_ 1782361280318799872
author Strickler, Susan R.
Bombarely, Aureliano
Munkvold, Jesse D.
York, Thomas
Menda, Naama
Martin, Gregory B.
Mueller, Lukas A.
author_facet Strickler, Susan R.
Bombarely, Aureliano
Munkvold, Jesse D.
York, Thomas
Menda, Naama
Martin, Gregory B.
Mueller, Lukas A.
author_sort Strickler, Susan R.
collection PubMed
description Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycopersicum, S. galapagense, S. pimpinellifolium, S. corneliomuelleri, and S. tuberosum and the genomic sequence from S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz’, an heirloom line, S. lycopersicum ‘Yellow Pear’, and two of cultivated tomato’s closest relatives, S. galapagense and S. pimpinellifolium, we have aimed to resolve the phylogenies of these closely related species as well as identify phylogenetic discordance in the reference cultivated tomato. Results. Divergence date estimates suggest that the divergence of S. lycopersicum, S. galapagense, and S. pimpinellifolium happened less than 0.5 MYA. Phylogenies based on 8,857 coding sequences support grouping of S. lycopersicum and S. galapagense, although two secondary trees are also highly represented. A total of 25 genes in our analysis had sites with evidence of positive selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage. Whole genome phylogenies showed that while incongruence is prevalent in genomic comparisons between these genotypes, likely as a result of introgression and incomplete lineage sorting, a primary phylogenetic history was strongly supported. Conclusions. Based on analysis of these genotypes, S. galapagense appears to be closely related to S. lycopersicum, suggesting they had a common ancestor prior to the arrival of an S. galapagense ancestor to the Galápagos Islands, but after divergence of the sequenced S. pimpinellifolium. Genes showing selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage may be important in domestication or selection occurring post-domestication. Further analysis of intraspecific data in these species will help to establish the evolutionary history of cultivated tomato. The use of an heirloom line is helpful in deducing true phylogenetic information of S. lycopersicum and identifying regions of introgression from wild species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43586952015-03-16 Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives Strickler, Susan R. Bombarely, Aureliano Munkvold, Jesse D. York, Thomas Menda, Naama Martin, Gregory B. Mueller, Lukas A. PeerJ Agricultural Science Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycopersicum, S. galapagense, S. pimpinellifolium, S. corneliomuelleri, and S. tuberosum and the genomic sequence from S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz’, an heirloom line, S. lycopersicum ‘Yellow Pear’, and two of cultivated tomato’s closest relatives, S. galapagense and S. pimpinellifolium, we have aimed to resolve the phylogenies of these closely related species as well as identify phylogenetic discordance in the reference cultivated tomato. Results. Divergence date estimates suggest that the divergence of S. lycopersicum, S. galapagense, and S. pimpinellifolium happened less than 0.5 MYA. Phylogenies based on 8,857 coding sequences support grouping of S. lycopersicum and S. galapagense, although two secondary trees are also highly represented. A total of 25 genes in our analysis had sites with evidence of positive selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage. Whole genome phylogenies showed that while incongruence is prevalent in genomic comparisons between these genotypes, likely as a result of introgression and incomplete lineage sorting, a primary phylogenetic history was strongly supported. Conclusions. Based on analysis of these genotypes, S. galapagense appears to be closely related to S. lycopersicum, suggesting they had a common ancestor prior to the arrival of an S. galapagense ancestor to the Galápagos Islands, but after divergence of the sequenced S. pimpinellifolium. Genes showing selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage may be important in domestication or selection occurring post-domestication. Further analysis of intraspecific data in these species will help to establish the evolutionary history of cultivated tomato. The use of an heirloom line is helpful in deducing true phylogenetic information of S. lycopersicum and identifying regions of introgression from wild species. PeerJ Inc. 2015-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4358695/ /pubmed/25780758 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793 Text en © 2015 Strickler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Strickler, Susan R.
Bombarely, Aureliano
Munkvold, Jesse D.
York, Thomas
Menda, Naama
Martin, Gregory B.
Mueller, Lukas A.
Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title_full Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title_fullStr Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title_short Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
title_sort comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780758
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793
work_keys_str_mv AT stricklersusanr comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT bombarelyaureliano comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT munkvoldjessed comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT yorkthomas comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT mendanaama comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT martingregoryb comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives
AT muellerlukasa comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives