Cargando…
Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives
Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780758 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793 |
_version_ | 1782361280318799872 |
---|---|
author | Strickler, Susan R. Bombarely, Aureliano Munkvold, Jesse D. York, Thomas Menda, Naama Martin, Gregory B. Mueller, Lukas A. |
author_facet | Strickler, Susan R. Bombarely, Aureliano Munkvold, Jesse D. York, Thomas Menda, Naama Martin, Gregory B. Mueller, Lukas A. |
author_sort | Strickler, Susan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycopersicum, S. galapagense, S. pimpinellifolium, S. corneliomuelleri, and S. tuberosum and the genomic sequence from S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz’, an heirloom line, S. lycopersicum ‘Yellow Pear’, and two of cultivated tomato’s closest relatives, S. galapagense and S. pimpinellifolium, we have aimed to resolve the phylogenies of these closely related species as well as identify phylogenetic discordance in the reference cultivated tomato. Results. Divergence date estimates suggest that the divergence of S. lycopersicum, S. galapagense, and S. pimpinellifolium happened less than 0.5 MYA. Phylogenies based on 8,857 coding sequences support grouping of S. lycopersicum and S. galapagense, although two secondary trees are also highly represented. A total of 25 genes in our analysis had sites with evidence of positive selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage. Whole genome phylogenies showed that while incongruence is prevalent in genomic comparisons between these genotypes, likely as a result of introgression and incomplete lineage sorting, a primary phylogenetic history was strongly supported. Conclusions. Based on analysis of these genotypes, S. galapagense appears to be closely related to S. lycopersicum, suggesting they had a common ancestor prior to the arrival of an S. galapagense ancestor to the Galápagos Islands, but after divergence of the sequenced S. pimpinellifolium. Genes showing selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage may be important in domestication or selection occurring post-domestication. Further analysis of intraspecific data in these species will help to establish the evolutionary history of cultivated tomato. The use of an heirloom line is helpful in deducing true phylogenetic information of S. lycopersicum and identifying regions of introgression from wild species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4358695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43586952015-03-16 Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives Strickler, Susan R. Bombarely, Aureliano Munkvold, Jesse D. York, Thomas Menda, Naama Martin, Gregory B. Mueller, Lukas A. PeerJ Agricultural Science Background. Studies of ancestry are difficult in the tomato because it crosses with many wild relatives and species in the tomato clade that have diverged very recently. As a result, the phylogeny in relation to its closest relatives remains uncertain. By using the coding sequence from Solanum lycopersicum, S. galapagense, S. pimpinellifolium, S. corneliomuelleri, and S. tuberosum and the genomic sequence from S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz’, an heirloom line, S. lycopersicum ‘Yellow Pear’, and two of cultivated tomato’s closest relatives, S. galapagense and S. pimpinellifolium, we have aimed to resolve the phylogenies of these closely related species as well as identify phylogenetic discordance in the reference cultivated tomato. Results. Divergence date estimates suggest that the divergence of S. lycopersicum, S. galapagense, and S. pimpinellifolium happened less than 0.5 MYA. Phylogenies based on 8,857 coding sequences support grouping of S. lycopersicum and S. galapagense, although two secondary trees are also highly represented. A total of 25 genes in our analysis had sites with evidence of positive selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage. Whole genome phylogenies showed that while incongruence is prevalent in genomic comparisons between these genotypes, likely as a result of introgression and incomplete lineage sorting, a primary phylogenetic history was strongly supported. Conclusions. Based on analysis of these genotypes, S. galapagense appears to be closely related to S. lycopersicum, suggesting they had a common ancestor prior to the arrival of an S. galapagense ancestor to the Galápagos Islands, but after divergence of the sequenced S. pimpinellifolium. Genes showing selection along the S. lycopersicum lineage may be important in domestication or selection occurring post-domestication. Further analysis of intraspecific data in these species will help to establish the evolutionary history of cultivated tomato. The use of an heirloom line is helpful in deducing true phylogenetic information of S. lycopersicum and identifying regions of introgression from wild species. PeerJ Inc. 2015-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4358695/ /pubmed/25780758 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793 Text en © 2015 Strickler et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Science Strickler, Susan R. Bombarely, Aureliano Munkvold, Jesse D. York, Thomas Menda, Naama Martin, Gregory B. Mueller, Lukas A. Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title | Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title_full | Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title_fullStr | Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title_short | Comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
title_sort | comparative genomics and phylogenetic discordance of cultivated tomato and close wild relatives |
topic | Agricultural Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25780758 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stricklersusanr comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT bombarelyaureliano comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT munkvoldjessed comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT yorkthomas comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT mendanaama comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT martingregoryb comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives AT muellerlukasa comparativegenomicsandphylogeneticdiscordanceofcultivatedtomatoandclosewildrelatives |