Cargando…

Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Geriatric screening tools are increasingly implemented in daily practice, especially in the oncology setting, but also in primary care in some countries such as the Netherlands. Nonetheless, validation of these tools regarding their ability to predict relevant outcomes is lacking. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deckx, Laura, van den Akker, Marjan, Daniels, Liesbeth, De Jonge, Eric T, Bulens, Paul, Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG, van Abbema, Doris L, Buntinx, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x
_version_ 1782361286748667904
author Deckx, Laura
van den Akker, Marjan
Daniels, Liesbeth
De Jonge, Eric T
Bulens, Paul
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
van Abbema, Doris L
Buntinx, Frank
author_facet Deckx, Laura
van den Akker, Marjan
Daniels, Liesbeth
De Jonge, Eric T
Bulens, Paul
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
van Abbema, Doris L
Buntinx, Frank
author_sort Deckx, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geriatric screening tools are increasingly implemented in daily practice, especially in the oncology setting, but also in primary care in some countries such as the Netherlands. Nonetheless, validation of these tools regarding their ability to predict relevant outcomes is lacking. In this study we evaluate if geriatric screening tools predict decline in functional status and quality of life after one year, in a population of older cancer patients and an older primary care population without cancer with a life expectancy of at least six months. METHODS: Older cancer patients and a general older primary care population without a history of cancer (≥70 years) were included in an on-going prospective cohort study. Data were collected at baseline and after one-year follow-up. Functional decline was based on the Katz Index and Lawton IADL-scale and was defined as deterioration on one or more domains. Decline in quality of life was measured using the global health related subscale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and was defined as a decline ≥10 points. The selected geriatric screening tools were the abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Groningen Frailty Indicator, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, and G8. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and odds ratios to assess if normal versus abnormal scores predict functional decline and decline in quality of life. RESULTS: One-year follow-up data were available for 134 older cancer patients and 220 persons without cancer. Abnormal scores of all screening tools were significantly associated with functional decline. However, this was only true for older persons without cancer, and only in univariate analyses. For functional decline, sensitivity ranged from 54% to 71% and specificity from 33% to 66%. For decline in quality of life, sensitivity ranged from 40% to 67% and specificity from 37% to 54%. CONCLUSION: In older persons with a relatively good prognosis, geriatric screening tools are of limited use in identifying persons at risk for decline in functional status or quality of life after one year. Hence, a geriatric screening tool cannot be relied on in isolation, but they do provide very valuable information and may prompt physicians to also consider different aspects of functioning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43587252015-03-14 Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study Deckx, Laura van den Akker, Marjan Daniels, Liesbeth De Jonge, Eric T Bulens, Paul Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG van Abbema, Doris L Buntinx, Frank BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Geriatric screening tools are increasingly implemented in daily practice, especially in the oncology setting, but also in primary care in some countries such as the Netherlands. Nonetheless, validation of these tools regarding their ability to predict relevant outcomes is lacking. In this study we evaluate if geriatric screening tools predict decline in functional status and quality of life after one year, in a population of older cancer patients and an older primary care population without cancer with a life expectancy of at least six months. METHODS: Older cancer patients and a general older primary care population without a history of cancer (≥70 years) were included in an on-going prospective cohort study. Data were collected at baseline and after one-year follow-up. Functional decline was based on the Katz Index and Lawton IADL-scale and was defined as deterioration on one or more domains. Decline in quality of life was measured using the global health related subscale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and was defined as a decline ≥10 points. The selected geriatric screening tools were the abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Groningen Frailty Indicator, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, and G8. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and odds ratios to assess if normal versus abnormal scores predict functional decline and decline in quality of life. RESULTS: One-year follow-up data were available for 134 older cancer patients and 220 persons without cancer. Abnormal scores of all screening tools were significantly associated with functional decline. However, this was only true for older persons without cancer, and only in univariate analyses. For functional decline, sensitivity ranged from 54% to 71% and specificity from 33% to 66%. For decline in quality of life, sensitivity ranged from 40% to 67% and specificity from 37% to 54%. CONCLUSION: In older persons with a relatively good prognosis, geriatric screening tools are of limited use in identifying persons at risk for decline in functional status or quality of life after one year. Hence, a geriatric screening tool cannot be relied on in isolation, but they do provide very valuable information and may prompt physicians to also consider different aspects of functioning. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4358725/ /pubmed/25888485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x Text en © Deckx et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deckx, Laura
van den Akker, Marjan
Daniels, Liesbeth
De Jonge, Eric T
Bulens, Paul
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne CG
van Abbema, Doris L
Buntinx, Frank
Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title_full Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title_fullStr Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title_short Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
title_sort geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x
work_keys_str_mv AT deckxlaura geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT vandenakkermarjan geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT danielsliesbeth geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT dejongeerict geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT bulenspaul geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT tjanheijnenviviannecg geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT vanabbemadorisl geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy
AT buntinxfrank geriatricscreeningtoolsareoflimitedvaluetopredictdeclineinfunctionalstatusandqualityofliferesultsofacohortstudy