Cargando…

Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review

The increasing proportion of human papilloma virus-related oropharynx cancers has led to improved success in the treatment of this disease. However, the current low recurrence rate after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer highlights the continued need for, as well as the challenges of, designing an e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wang, Steven J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0481-1
_version_ 1782361300987281408
author Wang, Steven J
author_facet Wang, Steven J
author_sort Wang, Steven J
collection PubMed
description The increasing proportion of human papilloma virus-related oropharynx cancers has led to improved success in the treatment of this disease. However, the current low recurrence rate after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer highlights the continued need for, as well as the challenges of, designing an effective follow-up surveillance program. There are frequently multiple modalities used in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer, resulting in short- and long-term tissue changes to the head and neck that challenge clinical distinction of recurrence versus treatment-related changes. The oropharynx subsite is characterized by complex anatomy not always accessible to physical exam, making radiologic imaging a potentially useful supplement for effective follow-up assessment. In this manuscript, the literature regarding the type of radiologic imaging modality and the frequency of obtaining imaging studies in the surveillance follow-up after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer is reviewed. While ultrasound and MRI have useful characteristics that deserve further study, PET/CT appears to have the best sensitivity and specificity for imaging surveillance follow-up of head and neck cancers including oropharyngeal cancer. A negative PET/CT is particularly useful as a predictor of prognosis and can guide the clinician as to when to stop obtaining additional imaging studies in the absence of clinical signs of recurrence. However, there is scant evidence that imaging surveillance can improve survival outcomes. Suggestions to guide future imaging surveillance research studies are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43588732015-03-14 Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review Wang, Steven J World J Surg Oncol Review The increasing proportion of human papilloma virus-related oropharynx cancers has led to improved success in the treatment of this disease. However, the current low recurrence rate after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer highlights the continued need for, as well as the challenges of, designing an effective follow-up surveillance program. There are frequently multiple modalities used in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer, resulting in short- and long-term tissue changes to the head and neck that challenge clinical distinction of recurrence versus treatment-related changes. The oropharynx subsite is characterized by complex anatomy not always accessible to physical exam, making radiologic imaging a potentially useful supplement for effective follow-up assessment. In this manuscript, the literature regarding the type of radiologic imaging modality and the frequency of obtaining imaging studies in the surveillance follow-up after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer is reviewed. While ultrasound and MRI have useful characteristics that deserve further study, PET/CT appears to have the best sensitivity and specificity for imaging surveillance follow-up of head and neck cancers including oropharyngeal cancer. A negative PET/CT is particularly useful as a predictor of prognosis and can guide the clinician as to when to stop obtaining additional imaging studies in the absence of clinical signs of recurrence. However, there is scant evidence that imaging surveillance can improve survival outcomes. Suggestions to guide future imaging surveillance research studies are provided. BioMed Central 2015-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4358873/ /pubmed/25889162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0481-1 Text en © Wang; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Steven J
Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title_full Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title_fullStr Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title_short Surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
title_sort surveillance radiologic imaging after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0481-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wangstevenj surveillanceradiologicimagingaftertreatmentoforopharyngealcancerareview