Cargando…

Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is used in specialized centers all over the world. However, laparoscopic liver resection has never been compared with open liver resection in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The Oslo-CoMet Study is a randomized trial into laparoscopic versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fretland, Åsmund Avdem, Kazaryan, Airazat M, Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Atle, Flatmark, Kjersti, Andersen, Marit Helen, Tønnessen, Tor Inge, Bjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler, Fagerland, Morten Wang, Kristiansen, Ronny, Øyri, Karl, Edwin, Bjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5
_version_ 1782361307581775872
author Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
Kazaryan, Airazat M
Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Atle
Flatmark, Kjersti
Andersen, Marit Helen
Tønnessen, Tor Inge
Bjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Kristiansen, Ronny
Øyri, Karl
Edwin, Bjørn
author_facet Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
Kazaryan, Airazat M
Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Atle
Flatmark, Kjersti
Andersen, Marit Helen
Tønnessen, Tor Inge
Bjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Kristiansen, Ronny
Øyri, Karl
Edwin, Bjørn
author_sort Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is used in specialized centers all over the world. However, laparoscopic liver resection has never been compared with open liver resection in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The Oslo-CoMet Study is a randomized trial into laparoscopic versus open liver resection for the surgical management of hepatic colorectal metastases. The primary outcome is 30-day perioperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes include 5-year survival (overall, disease-free and recurrence-free), resection margins, recurrence pattern, postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, and evaluation of the inflammatory response. A cost-utility analysis of replacing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery will also be performed. The study includes all resections for colorectal liver metastases, except formal hemihepatectomies, resections where reconstruction of vessels/bile ducts is necessary and resections that need to be combined with ablation. All patients will participate in an enhanced recovery after surgery program. A biobank of liver and tumor tissue will be established and molecular analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: After 35 months of recruitment, 200 patients have been included in the trial. Molecular and immunology data are being analyzed. Results for primary and secondary outcome measures will be presented following the conclusion of the study (late 2015). The Oslo-CoMet Study will provide the first level 1 evidence on the benefits of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrals.gov (NCT01516710) on 19 January 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43589112015-03-14 Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Fretland, Åsmund Avdem Kazaryan, Airazat M Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Atle Flatmark, Kjersti Andersen, Marit Helen Tønnessen, Tor Inge Bjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler Fagerland, Morten Wang Kristiansen, Ronny Øyri, Karl Edwin, Bjørn Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is used in specialized centers all over the world. However, laparoscopic liver resection has never been compared with open liver resection in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The Oslo-CoMet Study is a randomized trial into laparoscopic versus open liver resection for the surgical management of hepatic colorectal metastases. The primary outcome is 30-day perioperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes include 5-year survival (overall, disease-free and recurrence-free), resection margins, recurrence pattern, postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, and evaluation of the inflammatory response. A cost-utility analysis of replacing open surgery with laparoscopic surgery will also be performed. The study includes all resections for colorectal liver metastases, except formal hemihepatectomies, resections where reconstruction of vessels/bile ducts is necessary and resections that need to be combined with ablation. All patients will participate in an enhanced recovery after surgery program. A biobank of liver and tumor tissue will be established and molecular analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: After 35 months of recruitment, 200 patients have been included in the trial. Molecular and immunology data are being analyzed. Results for primary and secondary outcome measures will be presented following the conclusion of the study (late 2015). The Oslo-CoMet Study will provide the first level 1 evidence on the benefits of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrals.gov (NCT01516710) on 19 January 2012. BioMed Central 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4358911/ /pubmed/25872027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5 Text en © Fretland et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fretland, Åsmund Avdem
Kazaryan, Airazat M
Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Atle
Flatmark, Kjersti
Andersen, Marit Helen
Tønnessen, Tor Inge
Bjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Kristiansen, Ronny
Øyri, Karl
Edwin, Bjørn
Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the oslo-comet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fretlandasmundavdem openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kazaryanairazatm openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bjørnbethbjørnatle openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT flatmarkkjersti openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andersenmarithelen openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tønnessentoringe openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bjørnelvgudrunmariawaaler openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fagerlandmortenwang openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kristiansenronny openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT øyrikarl openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT edwinbjørn openversuslaparoscopicliverresectionforcolorectallivermetastasestheoslocometstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial