Cargando…

Survival of Proper Hepatic Artery Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Implications for D2 Lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a discrepancy between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines (7(th) edition) and the Japanese treatment guidelines (3(rd) edition) with regard to the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. In the AJCC, hepatic artery station (No.12a) lymph no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirong, Cai, Jianhui, Chen, Chuangqi, Chen, Kaiming, Wu, Xinhua, Zhang, Wu, Song, Yulong, He
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118953
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a discrepancy between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines (7(th) edition) and the Japanese treatment guidelines (3(rd) edition) with regard to the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. In the AJCC, hepatic artery station (No.12a) lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as distant metastasis, whereas in the Japanese guidelines, this classified is regional metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate whether it is appropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis in consideration of survival outcome. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, data from patients with gastric cancer who underwent regular D2 or greater lymphadenectomy between 1996 and 2006 were evaluated to determine any association between the clinicopathological features of hepatic artery LNs and survival prognosis. RESULTS: Among the 247 patients with gastric cancer who underwent No.12 LN harvest, 45 (18.2%) were positive for No.12a LN metastasis. No.12a LN metastasis was significantly associated with poor clinicopathological features, advanced tumor stage, and poor overall survival. The 5-year survival rate of patients with No.12a LN metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but was similar to that of patients with LN involvement in the D2 lymphadenectomy region (P > 0.05). No.12a LN metastasis was shown to significantly influence survival outcome in univariate analysis, but was not identified as a significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. In logistic multivariate regression analysis, T stage, N stage, and station No.3, 5, and 6 LN metastasis were independent predictors of No.12a LN involvement. CONCLUSIONS: It is inappropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis. We propose that this be considered as regional metastasis and be included in the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy to improve survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.