Cargando…

Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection

Chlamydia psittaci is a zoonotic bacterium with a wide host range that can cause respiratory disease in humans and cattle. In the present study, effects of treatment with macrolides and quinolones applied alone or in combination with rifampicin were tested in a previously established bovine model of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prohl, Annette, Lohr, Markus, Ostermann, Carola, Liebler-Tenorio, Elisabeth, Berndt, Angela, Schroedl, Wieland, Rothe, Michael, Schubert, Evelyn, Sachse, Konrad, Reinhold, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119736
_version_ 1782361319039565824
author Prohl, Annette
Lohr, Markus
Ostermann, Carola
Liebler-Tenorio, Elisabeth
Berndt, Angela
Schroedl, Wieland
Rothe, Michael
Schubert, Evelyn
Sachse, Konrad
Reinhold, Petra
author_facet Prohl, Annette
Lohr, Markus
Ostermann, Carola
Liebler-Tenorio, Elisabeth
Berndt, Angela
Schroedl, Wieland
Rothe, Michael
Schubert, Evelyn
Sachse, Konrad
Reinhold, Petra
author_sort Prohl, Annette
collection PubMed
description Chlamydia psittaci is a zoonotic bacterium with a wide host range that can cause respiratory disease in humans and cattle. In the present study, effects of treatment with macrolides and quinolones applied alone or in combination with rifampicin were tested in a previously established bovine model of respiratory C. psittaci infection. Fifty animals were inoculated intrabronchially at the age of 6–8 weeks. Seven served as untreated controls, the others were assigned to seven treatment groups: (i) rifampicin, (ii) enrofloxacin, (iii) enrofloxacin + rifampicin, (iv) azithromycin, (v) azithromycin + rifampicin, (vi) erythromycin, and (vii) erythromycin + rifampicin. Treatment started 30 hours after inoculation and continued until 14 days after inoculation (dpi), when all animals were necropsied. The infection was successful in all animals and sufficient antibiotic levels were detected in blood plasma and tissue of the treated animals. Reisolation of the pathogen was achieved more often from untreated animals than from other groups. Nevertheless, pathogen detection by PCR was possible to the same extent in all animals and there were no significant differences between treated and untreated animals in terms of local (i.e. cell count and differentiation of BALF-cells) and systemic inflammation (i.e. white blood cells and concentration of acute phase protein LBP), clinical signs, and pathological findings at necropsy. Regardless of the reduced reisolation rate in treated animals, the treatment of experimentally induced respiratory C. psittaci infection with enrofloxacin, azithromycin or erythromycin alone or in combination with rifampicin was without obvious benefit for the host, since no significant differences in clinical and pathological findings or inflammatory parameters were detected and all animals recovered clinically within two weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43589642015-03-23 Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection Prohl, Annette Lohr, Markus Ostermann, Carola Liebler-Tenorio, Elisabeth Berndt, Angela Schroedl, Wieland Rothe, Michael Schubert, Evelyn Sachse, Konrad Reinhold, Petra PLoS One Research Article Chlamydia psittaci is a zoonotic bacterium with a wide host range that can cause respiratory disease in humans and cattle. In the present study, effects of treatment with macrolides and quinolones applied alone or in combination with rifampicin were tested in a previously established bovine model of respiratory C. psittaci infection. Fifty animals were inoculated intrabronchially at the age of 6–8 weeks. Seven served as untreated controls, the others were assigned to seven treatment groups: (i) rifampicin, (ii) enrofloxacin, (iii) enrofloxacin + rifampicin, (iv) azithromycin, (v) azithromycin + rifampicin, (vi) erythromycin, and (vii) erythromycin + rifampicin. Treatment started 30 hours after inoculation and continued until 14 days after inoculation (dpi), when all animals were necropsied. The infection was successful in all animals and sufficient antibiotic levels were detected in blood plasma and tissue of the treated animals. Reisolation of the pathogen was achieved more often from untreated animals than from other groups. Nevertheless, pathogen detection by PCR was possible to the same extent in all animals and there were no significant differences between treated and untreated animals in terms of local (i.e. cell count and differentiation of BALF-cells) and systemic inflammation (i.e. white blood cells and concentration of acute phase protein LBP), clinical signs, and pathological findings at necropsy. Regardless of the reduced reisolation rate in treated animals, the treatment of experimentally induced respiratory C. psittaci infection with enrofloxacin, azithromycin or erythromycin alone or in combination with rifampicin was without obvious benefit for the host, since no significant differences in clinical and pathological findings or inflammatory parameters were detected and all animals recovered clinically within two weeks. Public Library of Science 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4358964/ /pubmed/25768665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119736 Text en © 2015 Prohl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prohl, Annette
Lohr, Markus
Ostermann, Carola
Liebler-Tenorio, Elisabeth
Berndt, Angela
Schroedl, Wieland
Rothe, Michael
Schubert, Evelyn
Sachse, Konrad
Reinhold, Petra
Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title_full Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title_fullStr Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title_full_unstemmed Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title_short Enrofloxacin and Macrolides Alone or in Combination with Rifampicin as Antimicrobial Treatment in a Bovine Model of Acute Chlamydia psittaci Infection
title_sort enrofloxacin and macrolides alone or in combination with rifampicin as antimicrobial treatment in a bovine model of acute chlamydia psittaci infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119736
work_keys_str_mv AT prohlannette enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT lohrmarkus enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT ostermanncarola enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT lieblertenorioelisabeth enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT berndtangela enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT schroedlwieland enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT rothemichael enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT schubertevelyn enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT sachsekonrad enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection
AT reinholdpetra enrofloxacinandmacrolidesaloneorincombinationwithrifampicinasantimicrobialtreatmentinabovinemodelofacutechlamydiapsittaciinfection