Cargando…

Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a simple optimisation method for improving target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical oesophageal cancer. METHODS: For 20 selected patients, clinically acceptable original IMRT plans (Original plans) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Jia-Yang, Cheung, Michael Lok-Man, Huang, Bao-Tian, Wu, Li-Li, Xie, Wen-Jia, Chen, Zhi-Jian, Li, De-Rui, Xie, Liang-Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121679
_version_ 1782361319267106816
author Lu, Jia-Yang
Cheung, Michael Lok-Man
Huang, Bao-Tian
Wu, Li-Li
Xie, Wen-Jia
Chen, Zhi-Jian
Li, De-Rui
Xie, Liang-Xi
author_facet Lu, Jia-Yang
Cheung, Michael Lok-Man
Huang, Bao-Tian
Wu, Li-Li
Xie, Wen-Jia
Chen, Zhi-Jian
Li, De-Rui
Xie, Liang-Xi
author_sort Lu, Jia-Yang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a simple optimisation method for improving target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical oesophageal cancer. METHODS: For 20 selected patients, clinically acceptable original IMRT plans (Original plans) were created, and two optimisation methods were adopted to improve the plans: 1) a base dose function (BDF)-based method, in which the treatment plans were re-optimised based on the original plans, and 2) a dose-controlling structure (DCS)-based method, in which the original plans were re-optimised by assigning additional constraints for hot and cold spots. The Original, BDF-based and DCS-based plans were compared with regard to target dose homogeneity, conformity, OAR sparing, planning time and monitor units (MUs). Dosimetric verifications were performed and delivery times were recorded for the BDF-based and DCS-based plans. RESULTS: The BDF-based plans provided significantly superior dose homogeneity and conformity compared with both the DCS-based and Original plans. The BDF-based method further reduced the doses delivered to the OARs by approximately 1–3%. The re-optimisation time was reduced by approximately 28%, but the MUs and delivery time were slightly increased. All verification tests were passed and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The BDF-based method for the optimisation of IMRT for cervical oesophageal cancer can achieve significantly better dose distributions with better planning efficiency at the expense of slightly more MUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4358965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43589652015-03-23 Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method Lu, Jia-Yang Cheung, Michael Lok-Man Huang, Bao-Tian Wu, Li-Li Xie, Wen-Jia Chen, Zhi-Jian Li, De-Rui Xie, Liang-Xi PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a simple optimisation method for improving target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical oesophageal cancer. METHODS: For 20 selected patients, clinically acceptable original IMRT plans (Original plans) were created, and two optimisation methods were adopted to improve the plans: 1) a base dose function (BDF)-based method, in which the treatment plans were re-optimised based on the original plans, and 2) a dose-controlling structure (DCS)-based method, in which the original plans were re-optimised by assigning additional constraints for hot and cold spots. The Original, BDF-based and DCS-based plans were compared with regard to target dose homogeneity, conformity, OAR sparing, planning time and monitor units (MUs). Dosimetric verifications were performed and delivery times were recorded for the BDF-based and DCS-based plans. RESULTS: The BDF-based plans provided significantly superior dose homogeneity and conformity compared with both the DCS-based and Original plans. The BDF-based method further reduced the doses delivered to the OARs by approximately 1–3%. The re-optimisation time was reduced by approximately 28%, but the MUs and delivery time were slightly increased. All verification tests were passed and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: The BDF-based method for the optimisation of IMRT for cervical oesophageal cancer can achieve significantly better dose distributions with better planning efficiency at the expense of slightly more MUs. Public Library of Science 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4358965/ /pubmed/25768733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121679 Text en © 2015 Lu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lu, Jia-Yang
Cheung, Michael Lok-Man
Huang, Bao-Tian
Wu, Li-Li
Xie, Wen-Jia
Chen, Zhi-Jian
Li, De-Rui
Xie, Liang-Xi
Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title_full Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title_fullStr Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title_full_unstemmed Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title_short Improving Target Coverage and Organ-at-Risk Sparing in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Oesophageal Cancer Using a Simple Optimisation Method
title_sort improving target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical oesophageal cancer using a simple optimisation method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4358965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121679
work_keys_str_mv AT lujiayang improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT cheungmichaellokman improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT huangbaotian improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT wulili improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT xiewenjia improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT chenzhijian improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT liderui improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod
AT xieliangxi improvingtargetcoverageandorganatrisksparinginintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforcervicaloesophagealcancerusingasimpleoptimisationmethod