Cargando…

Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) of the frequency variation produced by the microstructure of white matter (WM). METHODS: The frequency offsets in a WM tissue sample that are not explained by the effect of bulk i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wharton, Samuel, Bowtell, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25189
_version_ 1782361329563074560
author Wharton, Samuel
Bowtell, Richard
author_facet Wharton, Samuel
Bowtell, Richard
author_sort Wharton, Samuel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effects on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) of the frequency variation produced by the microstructure of white matter (WM). METHODS: The frequency offsets in a WM tissue sample that are not explained by the effect of bulk isotropic or anisotropic magnetic susceptibility, but rather result from the local microstructure, were characterized for the first time. QSM and STI were then applied to simulated frequency maps that were calculated using a digitized whole-brain, WM model formed from anatomical and diffusion tensor imaging data acquired from a volunteer. In this model, the magnitudes of the frequency contributions due to anisotropy and microstructure were derived from the results of the tissue experiments. RESULTS: The simulations suggest that the frequency contribution of microstructure is much larger than that due to bulk effects of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility. In QSM, the microstructure contribution introduced artificial WM heterogeneity. For the STI processing, the microstructure contribution caused the susceptibility anisotropy to be significantly overestimated. CONCLUSION: Microstructure-related phase offsets in WM yield artifacts in the calculated susceptibility maps. If susceptibility mapping is to become a robust MRI technique, further research should be carried out to reduce the confounding effects of microstructure-related frequency contributions. Magn Reson Med 73:1258–1269, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4359018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43590182015-03-19 Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps Wharton, Samuel Bowtell, Richard Magn Reson Med Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research—Full Papers PURPOSE: To investigate the effects on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) of the frequency variation produced by the microstructure of white matter (WM). METHODS: The frequency offsets in a WM tissue sample that are not explained by the effect of bulk isotropic or anisotropic magnetic susceptibility, but rather result from the local microstructure, were characterized for the first time. QSM and STI were then applied to simulated frequency maps that were calculated using a digitized whole-brain, WM model formed from anatomical and diffusion tensor imaging data acquired from a volunteer. In this model, the magnitudes of the frequency contributions due to anisotropy and microstructure were derived from the results of the tissue experiments. RESULTS: The simulations suggest that the frequency contribution of microstructure is much larger than that due to bulk effects of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility. In QSM, the microstructure contribution introduced artificial WM heterogeneity. For the STI processing, the microstructure contribution caused the susceptibility anisotropy to be significantly overestimated. CONCLUSION: Microstructure-related phase offsets in WM yield artifacts in the calculated susceptibility maps. If susceptibility mapping is to become a robust MRI technique, further research should be carried out to reduce the confounding effects of microstructure-related frequency contributions. Magn Reson Med 73:1258–1269, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-03 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4359018/ /pubmed/24619643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25189 Text en © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research—Full Papers
Wharton, Samuel
Bowtell, Richard
Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title_full Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title_fullStr Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title_full_unstemmed Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title_short Effects of White Matter Microstructure on Phase and Susceptibility Maps
title_sort effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps
topic Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research—Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25189
work_keys_str_mv AT whartonsamuel effectsofwhitemattermicrostructureonphaseandsusceptibilitymaps
AT bowtellrichard effectsofwhitemattermicrostructureonphaseandsusceptibilitymaps