Cargando…
An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants
BACKGROUND: Plant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and bac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y |
_version_ | 1782361417965371392 |
---|---|
author | Oellrich, Anika Walls, Ramona L Cannon, Ethalinda KS Cannon, Steven B Cooper, Laurel Gardiner, Jack Gkoutos, Georgios V Harper, Lisa He, Mingze Hoehndorf, Robert Jaiswal, Pankaj Kalberer, Scott R Lloyd, John P Meinke, David Menda, Naama Moore, Laura Nelson, Rex T Pujar, Anuradha Lawrence, Carolyn J Huala, Eva |
author_facet | Oellrich, Anika Walls, Ramona L Cannon, Ethalinda KS Cannon, Steven B Cooper, Laurel Gardiner, Jack Gkoutos, Georgios V Harper, Lisa He, Mingze Hoehndorf, Robert Jaiswal, Pankaj Kalberer, Scott R Lloyd, John P Meinke, David Menda, Naama Moore, Laura Nelson, Rex T Pujar, Anuradha Lawrence, Carolyn J Huala, Eva |
author_sort | Oellrich, Anika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and backgrounds. Although phenotype comparisons across datasets have long been possible on a small scale, comprehensive queries and analyses that span a broad set of reference species, research disciplines, and knowledge domains continue to be severely limited by the absence of a common semantic framework. RESULTS: We developed a workflow to curate and standardize existing phenotype datasets for six plant species, encompassing both model species and crop plants with established genetic resources. Our effort focused on mutant phenotypes associated with genes of known sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Arabidopsis), Zea mays L. subsp. mays (maize), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic or Medicago), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), and Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato). We applied the same ontologies, annotation standards, formats, and best practices across all six species, thereby ensuring that the shared dataset could be used for cross-species querying and semantic similarity analyses. Curated phenotypes were first converted into a common format using taxonomically broad ontologies such as the Plant Ontology, Gene Ontology, and Phenotype and Trait Ontology. We then compared ontology-based phenotypic descriptions with an existing classification system for plant phenotypes and evaluated our semantic similarity dataset for its ability to enhance predictions of gene families, protein functions, and shared metabolic pathways that underlie informative plant phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ontologies, annotation standards, shared formats, and best practices for cross-taxon phenotype data analyses represents a novel approach to plant phenomics that enhances the utility of model genetic organisms and can be readily applied to species with fewer genetic resources and less well-characterized genomes. In addition, these tools should enhance future efforts to explore the relationships among phenotypic similarity, gene function, and sequence similarity in plants, and to make genotype-to-phenotype predictions relevant to plant biology, crop improvement, and potentially even human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4359497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43594972015-03-15 An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants Oellrich, Anika Walls, Ramona L Cannon, Ethalinda KS Cannon, Steven B Cooper, Laurel Gardiner, Jack Gkoutos, Georgios V Harper, Lisa He, Mingze Hoehndorf, Robert Jaiswal, Pankaj Kalberer, Scott R Lloyd, John P Meinke, David Menda, Naama Moore, Laura Nelson, Rex T Pujar, Anuradha Lawrence, Carolyn J Huala, Eva Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Plant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and backgrounds. Although phenotype comparisons across datasets have long been possible on a small scale, comprehensive queries and analyses that span a broad set of reference species, research disciplines, and knowledge domains continue to be severely limited by the absence of a common semantic framework. RESULTS: We developed a workflow to curate and standardize existing phenotype datasets for six plant species, encompassing both model species and crop plants with established genetic resources. Our effort focused on mutant phenotypes associated with genes of known sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Arabidopsis), Zea mays L. subsp. mays (maize), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic or Medicago), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), and Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato). We applied the same ontologies, annotation standards, formats, and best practices across all six species, thereby ensuring that the shared dataset could be used for cross-species querying and semantic similarity analyses. Curated phenotypes were first converted into a common format using taxonomically broad ontologies such as the Plant Ontology, Gene Ontology, and Phenotype and Trait Ontology. We then compared ontology-based phenotypic descriptions with an existing classification system for plant phenotypes and evaluated our semantic similarity dataset for its ability to enhance predictions of gene families, protein functions, and shared metabolic pathways that underlie informative plant phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ontologies, annotation standards, shared formats, and best practices for cross-taxon phenotype data analyses represents a novel approach to plant phenomics that enhances the utility of model genetic organisms and can be readily applied to species with fewer genetic resources and less well-characterized genomes. In addition, these tools should enhance future efforts to explore the relationships among phenotypic similarity, gene function, and sequence similarity in plants, and to make genotype-to-phenotype predictions relevant to plant biology, crop improvement, and potentially even human health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4359497/ /pubmed/25774204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y Text en © Oellrich et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Oellrich, Anika Walls, Ramona L Cannon, Ethalinda KS Cannon, Steven B Cooper, Laurel Gardiner, Jack Gkoutos, Georgios V Harper, Lisa He, Mingze Hoehndorf, Robert Jaiswal, Pankaj Kalberer, Scott R Lloyd, John P Meinke, David Menda, Naama Moore, Laura Nelson, Rex T Pujar, Anuradha Lawrence, Carolyn J Huala, Eva An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title | An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title_full | An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title_fullStr | An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title_full_unstemmed | An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title_short | An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
title_sort | ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oellrichanika anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT wallsramonal anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cannonethalindaks anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cannonstevenb anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cooperlaurel anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT gardinerjack anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT gkoutosgeorgiosv anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT harperlisa anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hemingze anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hoehndorfrobert anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT jaiswalpankaj anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT kalbererscottr anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT lloydjohnp anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT meinkedavid anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT mendanaama anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT moorelaura anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT nelsonrext anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT pujaranuradha anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT lawrencecarolynj anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hualaeva anontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT oellrichanika ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT wallsramonal ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cannonethalindaks ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cannonstevenb ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT cooperlaurel ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT gardinerjack ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT gkoutosgeorgiosv ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT harperlisa ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hemingze ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hoehndorfrobert ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT jaiswalpankaj ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT kalbererscottr ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT lloydjohnp ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT meinkedavid ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT mendanaama ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT moorelaura ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT nelsonrext ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT pujaranuradha ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT lawrencecarolynj ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants AT hualaeva ontologyapproachtocomparativephenomicsinplants |